Advertisement

Metabolomics

, 13:110 | Cite as

Exhaled breath analysis: a review of ‘breath-taking’ methods for off-line analysis

  • Oluwasola Lawal
  • Waqar M. Ahmed
  • Tamara M. E. Nijsen
  • Royston Goodacre
  • Stephen J. Fowler
Open Access
Review Article

Abstract

Background

The potential of exhaled breath sampling and analysis has long attracted interest in the areas of medical diagnosis and disease monitoring. This interest is attributed to its non-invasive nature, access to an unlimited sample supply (i.e., breath), and the potential to facilitate a rapid at patient diagnosis. However, progress from laboratory setting to routine clinical practice has been slow. Different methodologies of breath sampling, and the consequent difficulty in comparing and combining data, are considered to be a major contributor to this. To fulfil the potential of breath analysis within clinical and pre-clinical medicine, standardisation of some approaches to breath sampling and analysis will be beneficial.

Objectives

The aim of this review is to investigate the heterogeneity of breath sampling methods by performing an in depth bibliometric search to identify the current state of art in the area. In addition, the review will discuss and critique various breath sampling methods for off-line breath analysis.

Methods

Literature search was carried out in databases MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, INSPEC, COMPENDEX, PQSCITECH, and SCISEARCH using the STN platform which delivers peer-reviewed articles. Keywords searched for include breath, sampling, collection, pre-concentration, volatile. Forward and reverse search was then performed on initially included articles. The breath collection methodologies of all included articles was subsequently reviewed.

Results

Sampling methods differs between research groups, for example regarding the portion of breath being targeted. Definition of late expiratory breath varies between studies.

Conclusions

Breath analysis is an interdisciplinary field of study using clinical, analytical chemistry, data processing, and metabolomics expertise. A move towards standardisation in breath sampling is currently being promoted within the breath research community with a view to harmonising analysis and thereby increasing robustness and inter-laboratory comparisons.

Keywords

Breath sampling Breath phases Breath collection Breath pre-concentration 

Abbreviations

BCA

Breath collection apparatus

CAR

Carboxen

CW

Carbowax

DVB

Divinylbenzene

DMS

Differential mobility spectrometry

ECD

Electron capture detector

FID

Flame ionisation detector

GC-MS

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

MW

Molecular weight

NTDs

Needle trap devices

PA

Polyacrylate

PDMS

Polydimethylsiloxane

ppmv

Parts per million volume

ppbv

Parts per billion volume

SPME

Solid phase microextraction

TD

Thermal desorption

Tof

Time of flight

VOCs

Volatile organic compounds

1 Introduction

Breath odours were used for disease recognition long before present-day diagnostics; a sweet smell was associated with diabetes mellitus, fish-like smell with liver disease, and urine-like smell with kidney disease (Phillips 1992). Exhaled breath is predominantly composed of nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, argon as well as water vapour, whereas the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may be diagnostically useful are only found in trace concentrations (Lourenco and Turner 2014). Identification of VOCs patterns via human olfaction for disease diagnosis is of course subjective, and modern analytical instruments have sought to make this more reliable and robust. This has led to a sustained interest in breath diagnosis due to its non-invasive nature, with the ability to take repeat measurements with little stress or discomfort to the individual under investigation.

The concept behind breath metabolomics (also known as breathomics) is that the VOC profile in breath will be altered when a switch from a healthy to a pathological state occurs and this can be detected and potentially utilised for diagnosis and monitoring (Beale et al. 2016). The origin of breath VOCs include the environment (termed exogenous), the host (endogenous), and also the microbiome (the microorganisms that inhabit the mouth, lung and gut) (Boots et al. 2015; Bos et al. 2013; Schulz and Dickschat 2007). Most of the identified VOCs in exhaled breath originate exogenously (Costello et al. 2014), but endogenous and microbial VOCs are of more interest clinically. Endogenous VOCs have the potential to provide a snapshot of the physiological state of an individual whilst microbial VOCs could aid in pathogen identification, and the interaction of the host and commensal microorganisms contributes significant complexity to the metabolome of this complex “superorganism” (Goodacre 2007). Breath VOCs are found at trace levels [typically parts per million volume (ppmv) and lower] and their reliable detection poses a challenge, hence the typical use of sample pre-concentration coupled with a highly sensitive analytical instrument. Several methods are utilised for pre-concentration using thermal desorption chemistries such as solid phase microextraction (SPME) and needle trap devices (NTDs).

The off-line breathomics pipeline can be broadly broken down into breath sample collection, sample analysis, and data analysis (Rattray et al. 2014). There are several ways of achieving the desired goal in each section. For example, for breath sample collection, factors such as type of breath to be collected (i.e., mixed expiratory or end-tidal), single or multiple exhalation, and choice of breath capture technology are just some of the options to be considered (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

A diagram illustrating the off-line breath sampling pipeline. First section shows breath sampling containers [From L to R gas sampling bag, face-mask, Bio-VOC™ Sampler, breath collection apparatus (BCA), canister], second section indicates pre-concentration methods [From L to R solid phase microextraction (SPME), Thermal desorption (TD) tube, needle trap devices (NTDs)]. Gas chromatograph (GC) and mass analysers [quadrupole, time-of-flight (Tof)] are in the third section and the fourth section depicts targeted and untargeted data pre-treatment, processing and analysis

In this article, a summary of methods utilised in the off-line breathomics pipeline across studies is shown, whilst evaluating heterogeneity between methods and suggesting where standardisation may be beneficial.

2 Breathomics bibliography search criteria

The search was conducted to include articles until the 24th of October 2016 and the overall process used is schematically shown in the supplementary material (Figure S1). To ensure quality, the STN platform (https://www.stn.org/stn/) was utilised which delivers peer reviewed articles only. Databases searched include MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, INSPEC, COMPENDEX, PQSCITECH, and SCISEARCH. The search strategy included looking for (breath?) in article titles and ((sampl? OR collect? OR pre(W)concentrat? OR preconcentrat?) AND volatile) in the title and abstracts of articles. “?” and “W” denotes any number of characters to the right of the term and one character between two words (e.g. space or hyphen) respectively. In total, 395 manuscripts were obtained after automatic filtration. These articles were subsequently manually filtered to exclude review articles, breath condensate articles, articles with only real time analytical platforms, and also non-human studies. In the scenario where the same breath sampling methodology is used by the same first author in multiple articles, only one of the articles was included. To prevent bias, articles with the same breath sampling methodology and same last author (or thought to originate from the same laboratory) were classified together as one for descriptive statistics purposes. Additional articles were included following forward and reverse searching resulting in the final inclusion of 110 papers. From the final 110 articles the following parameters were assessed:

  • Exhaled breath portion targeted

  • Breath collection container

  • Pre-concentration methods

A schematic representation of exhaled breath phases is depicted in Fig. 2 and thus the breath type categories were sub-categorised into: late expiratory breath (Table 1), sampling from the end-tidal or ‘alveolar’ breath (Table 2), and mixed expiratory breath (Table 3). Other breath types can be found in the supplementary information (Table S1).These tables include a brief description of how the breath type was obtained, and further categorisation was performed according to the type of breath collection container, as well as the pre-concentration method employed in the study.

Fig. 2

Schematic visual representation depicting a single exhaled breath phases by capnography. Late expiratory breath is undefined as there is no standard practice for collecting this breath type and definitions vary. Phase I dead space, Phase II transition, Phase III alveolar.

Adapted from (Miekisch et al. 2008)

Table 1

Studies that collected late expiratory breath

Brief description

Breath collection container

Pre-concentration method

Reference

Dead space air collected in one bag, late expired air in separate bag

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Multi-bed ORBO™ 420/Tenax TA

TD tube—Tenax

(Amal et al. 2016; Barash et al. 2015; Gruber et al. 2014; Peled et al. 2012; Xu et al. 2013)

First 10 s excluded from bag

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Carboxen 1000/Carbopack X/Carbopack B

(Sanchez and Sacks 2006)

Deep breath, held for 10 s, exhaled slowly for 10 s prior to filling bag

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Carbopack Y/B/X/Carboxen 1000

(Libardoni et al. 2006)

Exhale air into tube connected to bag

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Tenax GC

(Preti et al. 1988)

Forced expiratory breath with first 2–3 s of expiration not collected

Tedlar bag

In house sorbent microtrap—Carboxen 1000, Carbopack X, Carbopack B

(Castellanos et al. 2016)

Final portion of exhaled breath collected

ALTEF polypropylene bag

TD tube—Tenax TA

(Harshman et al. 2015)

Last portion of breath collected using ha-pause method

Aluminium gas bag

TD tube—Tenax TA/Unicarb

(Berna et al. 2015)

Second half of exhaled breath collected

FlexFilm bag

TD tube—Tenax TA/Carbotrap B

(Bigazzi et al. 2016)

First third of each breath not collected

Tedlar bag

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Chen et al. 2016)

Dead space air collected in one bag, late expired air in separate bag

Mixed expiratory

Tedlar bag

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Capuano et al. 2015)

Dead space air collected in one bag, late expired air in separate bag

Tedlar bag

SPME—100 µM PDMS, 65 µM PDMS/DVB

(Ma et al. 2014)

Last portion of exhaled breath using breath collecting device

Tedlar bag

SPME—100 µM PDMS

(Wang et al. 2012)

Dead space air collected in one bag, late expired air in separate bag

Tedlar bag

SPME—fiber not specified

(Santonico et al. 2012)

Dead space air collected in one bag, late expired air in separate bag

Mylar bag

SPME—PDMS/DVB

(Hakim et al. 2011) (Peng et al. 2010)

Last of exhaled breath (150 mL)

Bio-VOC

TD tube—Carbotrap 300

(Das et al. 2014)

Deep breath and slowly exhale as fully as possible

Bio-VOC

TD tube—Carbograph 1TD/Carbopack X

(Phillips et al. 2014)

Retained last of exhaled breath (~ 100 mL)

Bio-VOC

TD tube—Tenax TA/Unicarb

(Zaric et al. 2014)

End of forced vital capacity collected

Bio-VOC

TD tube—Tenax TA/Graphitized Carbon black/Carbonized molecular sieve

(Jareno-Esteban et al. 2013)

Last portion of exhaled breath (~150 mL)

Bio-VOC

TD tube—Tenax TA/Unicarb

(Dadamio et al. 2012)

Last 150 mL of single slow vital capacity

Mouth air

Bio-VOC

TD tube—Tenax TA/Unicarb

(van den Velde et al. 2007)

Exhale until lungs are empty

Bio-VOC

TD tube—sorbent not specified

(Henderson and Matthews 2002)

Blow deeply and slowly through sampler (150 mL)

Bio-VOC

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Raninen et al. 2016)

Last 150 mL of single slow vital capacity

Bio-VOC

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS, 65 µM PDMS/DVB

(Corradi et al. 2015)

Last portion of exhaled breath (~100 mL)

Bio-VOC

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Kramer et al. 2015)

Last 150 mL of single slow vital capacity

Bio-VOC

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Poli et al. 2008)

Exhale into tubular structure with dead space air flowing downstream and air collected upstream

BCA

TD tube—Carbotrap/Carbosieve SIII

(Zeliger et al. 2012) (Moretti et al. 2004) (Phillips 1997)

18 mL of one single end-tidal exhalation portion

Gas-tight syringe, SPME vial

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(King et al. 2010)

Single exhalations with first 750 mL discarded

Gas-tight syringe, glass vial

SPME—65 µM PDMS/DVB

(Svensson et al. 2007)

Take 2–3 deep breaths, inhale and hold breath for 10–15 s, exhale into glass tube and collect an aliquot of end- expired air

Glass tube, aluminum tube

SPME—100 µM CAR/PDMS

TD tube—Tenax TA

(Prado et al. 2003)

Pressure sensors to estimate breath phases

Face mask

TD tube—Tenax TA/Carbograph 1TD

(Kang and Paul Thomas 2016) (Turner et al. 2011)

Pressure sensors to estimate breath phases

Face mask

TD tube—Tenax TA/Carbotrap

(Basanta et al. 2010) (Ibrahim et al. 2011)

First portion of breath removed

Breath device connected to desorption tube

TD tube—Carbopack B/Carbopack C

(Khalid et al. 2013)

Collected 1000 mL after discarding dead space

Glass container

TD tube—Tenax

(Mangler et al. 2012)

Two tidal volume ventilations, a deep inspiration and slow exhalation for 10 s, first 3 s discarded

Stainless steel canisters

Glass beads

(Minh et al. 2011)

Deep inspiration, 5 s breathhold, slow and complete exhalation over 10 s. First 2 s discarded

Electro-polished stainless steel

(Barker et al. 2006)

BCA breath collection apparatus, CAR carboxen, DMS differential mobility spectrometry, DVB divinylbenzene, ECD electron capture detector, FID flame ionisation detector, GC-MS gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, PDMS polydimethylsiloxane, TD thermal desorption, Tof time of flight

Table 2

Studies that collected end-tidal or ‘alveolar’ breath

Brief description

Breath collection container

Pre-concentration method

Reference

CO2 visual control & mixed expiratory using plastic straws

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Tenax TA/Carboxen 569/Carboxen 1000

(Filipiak et al. 2014)

CO2 visual control

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Tenax TA

(Grabowska-Polanowska et al. 2013)

CO2 visual control

Nalophan bag

TD tube—Tenax GR

(Salvo et al. 2015)

CO2 visual control

Tedlar bag

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Mochalski et al. 2014)

CO2 visual control

Tedlar bag

Gas-tight syringe, glass vial

SPME—PDMS, PDMS/DVB, PA, CAR/PDMS, CW/DVB, DVB/CAR/PDMS

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Bajtarevic et al. 2009; Buszewski et al. 2009; Ligor et al. 2007; Ulanowska et al. 2011; Ulanowska et al. 2012)

CO2 visual control

Tedlar bag

Gas-tight syringe, glass vial

SPME—CAR/PDMS

(Miekisch et al. 2008)

CO2 visual control

Tedlar bag

NTD—Tenax TA/Carbopack X/Carboxen 1000

(Mochalski et al. 2013)

CO2 visual control

NTD—Tenax TA/Carbopack X/Carboxen 1000

(Gruber et al. 2016)

CO2 visual control

NTD—Tenax TA/Carbopack X/Carboxen 1000

(Mieth et al. 2010)

CO2 visual control

Gas-tight syringe, glass vial

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Guo et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2014)

CO2 visual control

Gas-tight syringe, glass vial

SPME—CAR/PDMS

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

SPME—65 µM PDMS/DVB

(Fuchs et al. 2010; Goerl et al. 2013; Kischkel et al. 2012; Pabst et al. 2007; Schubert et al. 2005)

Rebreathed air

Tedlar bag

Freeze-trap breath in glass U-tube

(Jones et al. 1983)

*CO2 visual control

glass syringe

TD tube—Carbotrap B/Carbopack X

(Filipiak et al. 2015)

CW carbowax, NTD needle trap device, asterisk (*) denotes ventilated patients

Table 3

Studies that collected mixed expiratory breath

Brief description

Breath collection container

Pre-concentration method

Reference

Breathe through to face mask

Exhalation into bag

Inhale hold breath for 5 s and fully expire

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Carbograph 1TD/Carbopack X

TD tube—Carbon-filled

(Pijls et al. 2016) (Smolinska et al. 2014) (Baranska et al. 2013; Dallinga et al. 2010; Robroeks et al. 2010; Van Berkel et al. 2010; van de Kant et al. 2013; Verdam et al. 2013)

Single vital capacity following deep inspiration

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Carboxen 1003/Carbopack B/Carbopack Y

(Altomare et al. 2013)

Forced expiration

Tedlar, Supel foil, Supel inert gas sampling bags. Glass sampling bulbs

TD tube-Chromosorb106/Tenax TA/Carbopack B

SPME—DVB/CAR/PDMS

(Scott-Thomas et al. 2013)

Deep breath and exhale

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Carboxen 1000/Carbopack X /Carbopack B

(Alonso et al. 2010)

Spirometer used

Tedlar bag

TD tube—Tenax

(Gordon et al. 1988)

Inhale air to total lung capacity and exhale into bag

Mylar bag

TD tube—sorbent not specified

(Machado et al. 2005)

Breathe moderately into bag after initial washout period

Tedlar bag

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Hyspler et al. 2000)

Inhale/exhale normally then deeply exhale into bag after 5 s holding breath

Tedlar bag

SPME—50/30 µM DVB/CAR/PDMS

(Caldeira et al. 2012)

Deeply breathe into bag

Tedlar bag

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Song et al. 2010)

Breath collected using straw

Tedlar bag

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Bajtarevic et al. 2009; Ligor et al. 2009)

Exhale into bag via straw

Tedlar bag

SPME—CAR/PDMS

(Erhart et al. 2009)

Inhale moderately and exhale as much as possible

Tedlar bag

SPME—PDMS/DVB

(Deng et al. 2004)

Expired into a bag via a rudolph valve and delivery tube

Gas sampling bag

TD tube—Tenax GC

(Gordon et al. 1985)

Inspired/expired deeply 3×, retained breath for 20 s and then expired into container

Bio-VOC

TD tube—Tenax TA

(Marco and Grimalt 2015)

Breathe deeply through breath collection container

Bio-VOC, ALTEF polypropylene bag

TD tube—Tenax TA

(Kwak et al. 2014)

Breathe at normal frequency through RTube

RTube

SPME—65 µM PDMS/DVB

(Martin et al. 2010)

Deep inhalation and slow exhalation through sampling device

Gas bulb

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Schallschmidt et al. 2016)

Forced expiration of five breaths

Gas bulb

SPME—DVB/CAR/PDMS

(Syhre et al. 2009)

Inhaled through a carbon filter and exhaled into a reservoir

Stainless steel reservoir

TD tube—Tenax TA

(Gaida et al. 2016)

Whole breath sample collected

Stainless steel canister

(Gordon et al. 2002)

Mixed expiratory

SUMMA passivated stainless steel canisters

Stainless steel tube with glass beads

(Thomas et al. 1991)

Inhale (hold breath for 10 s) and forcefully expire

Glass tube

(Stein et al. 1996)

15 s Breath holding then exhalation

Polypropylene tubing, Gas-tight syringe

Glass trap tube—Tenax GC

(Tangerman et al. 1983)

Breath collected in bag

Tedlar bag

SPME—CAR/PDMS, DVB/PDMS, PDMS, CAR/PDMS/DVB

(Garcia et al. 2014)

Breath collected in bag

Tedlar bag

Glass vial

SPME—75 µM CAR/PDMS

(Rudnicka et al. 2011)

Breath collected in bag

Smart Bag PA

NTD—Carbopack X and CMS absorbent

(Ueta et al. 2014)

3 Sampling exhaled breath

During breath sampling, there is a choice made as to the portion of the breath that can be collected, and this can be broadly divided into late expiratory, end-tidal, and mixed expiratory. Mixed expiratory breath sampling encompasses the total exhaled breath which includes ‘dead space air’ (air not involved in gaseous exchange including mouth and potentially nose air) while the other breath types aim to minimise contamination from this dead space. Each of the three main types of sampling will be discussed further.

3.1 Late expiratory breath

Late expiratory breath sampling involves discarding the initial portion of exhaled breath (estimated dead space) and the subsequent capture of air at the end of the breath cycle. This type of breath accounts for a large proportion of studies which is presented in Table 1 (Fig. 3a). Minimisation of dead space (Phase I in Fig. 2) sampling allows a greater relative contribution of endogenous VOCs in the resultant sample, as well as reduces the levels of exogenous VOCs. In some methods this simply mandates excluding the first few seconds of exhalation from an individual before the breath sample is collected (Castellanos et al. 2016; Sanchez and Sacks 2006). Others involve a subject breathing into a collection reservoir for the breath to flow downstream whilst the air that is close to the donor is collected and may not be as straightforward (Phillips 1997). Time-controlled breath samples have been shown to be unreliable (Miekisch et al. 2008) and also with various timings used in different studies, there is no known optimal exclusion time duration. Concerns regarding reproducibility also arise due to distinct physiological properties of individuals such as cardiac output and pulmonary ventilation which may also introduce unwanted variability even within individuals sampled repeatedly in different physiological states (Cope et al. 2004; Sukul et al. 2016). Other sources of variability which may contribute to a lack of reproducibility include breath holding and expiratory flow rate which may alter VOC concentrations (Dweik et al. 2011; Sukul et al. 2014). Thus, with several concerns associated with this type of breath, more effort is still required before it is suitable for use in the clinic. The ideal system would need to adapt to the current physiological state of each individual to collect a representative sample and minimise dead space contamination, but this would be at the cost of the simplicity and practicality of many current systems (Kwak et al. 2014; Martin et al. 2010). By contrast, the use of a pressure sensor which activates sampling during a predefined phase of expiration, as determined by individual’s expiratory pressure curve, can be used as a personalised system for sampling (Basanta et al. 2010). It is highly engineered, bulky and complex but may be a more precise alternative.

Fig. 3

Bar charts showing the percentage distribution of a breath types, b breath collection containers, c pre-concentration methods reviewed

3.2 End-tidal or ‘Alveolar’ breath

The term ‘alveolar’ should be used with caution. It is used to indicate air collected from the start to the end of phase III of the breath cycle (Fig. 2). This type of air is stated to contain high concentrations of endogenous VOCs and minimal contaminants. However, using the term ‘alveolar’ may be misleading as gas exchange models have shown that VOC exchange with the airways may be occurring (Anderson et al. 2003; Anderson and Hlastala 2007) and thus may not completely reflect alveolar concentrations. Revised terminologies for this breath type include end-tidal, end-exhaled, and end-expired (Lourenco and Turner 2014); we use end-tidal in this article. This type of breath differs from late expiratory in terms of the confidence of obtaining a representative (and personalised) end-tidal sample, using a visual cue to collect air only from phase III.

In the articles reviewed, CO2 visual control accounts for the most common method (see ‘Brief description’ in Table 2) used to collect end-tidal breath and it involves monitoring CO2 concentrations during exhalation. During phase I of exhalation (Fig. 2), CO2 levels are generally low but rise during transition (phase II) and subsequently approaches a plateau signalling the start of alveolar phase III. Breath CO2 levels can be monitored via a device known as a capnometer that enables visualisation of the various phases for guidance on when to begin breath capture. There are devices which allow manual removal of air when alveolar phase has been reached (Miekisch et al. 2010, 2008) and also automatic capture (Salvo et al. 2015). The use of CO2 visual control breath sampling can also be extended to ventilated patients (Schubert et al. 2005).

Since a VOC profile of mostly endogenous sample is expected, there is a considerable likelihood of detecting potentially robust markers which decreases the chances of a type I error. Similarly to late expiratory breath, airway VOCs may be lost and as not all endogenous markers originate systemically, this breath type is not suited for investigating airway diseases. A well-known endogenous (non-organic) breath marker originating from the airways is nitric oxide which has been adopted in the clinic for the characterisation of asthma (Dweik et al. 2011). Since breath collection is adapted to each individual as samples are collected at phase III, variability regarding collection of samples is minimised and thus it would be more suitable for use in a clinic due to the availability of a benchmark. There are many steps before clinic adoption, but at least it might enable comparison of data between laboratories and studies.

Rebreathing is another proposed method for achieving an end-tidal breath sample. In this approach the aim is to achieve equilibrium between a container, the airways, and bloodstream as a subject breathes. There is usually no introduction of an external source of air during this process. It is postulated that the concentration in the container reflects a concentration close to blood concentration. A comparable breath and blood ethanol concentration has been shown using this method (Jones 1983). However, this is for a single analyte and may not apply to all metabolites. A similar result was obtained by Ohlsson et al. using a variation of rebreathing known as isothermal rebreathing (Ohlsson et al. 1990). This variant aims to minimise condensation in the container and airways. A protocol for isothermal rebreathing has also been developed by (O’Hara et al. 2008). Visual representation of breath phases is absent and may not be necessary using this method as ambient air is not introduced after the first exhalation. This approach may not be suitable for clinic due to potential discomfort to patients; i.e., rising carbon dioxide levels and decreasing oxygen concentration, and would certainly not be appropriate for individuals with acute respiratory compromise (or in mechanically ventilated patients). Condensation may also impact on the stability of VOCs collected in this manner if not addressed.

3.3 Mixed expiratory

Mixed expiratory breath can be considered as the simplest type of breath that can be obtained since it involves acquiring all phases of air exhaled as depicted in Fig. 2. It may be an attractive option due to its simplicity, however, it may not provide the best quality of breath sample due to a greater abundance of environmental, mouth, and nose contaminants. Although there are feature selection models to aid in candidate biomarker selection, unless subject numbers are very large, there may still be a considerable chance of a false positive result in this situation; i.e., identifying an exogenous VOC as a candidate marker. This has been acknowledged by several studies highlighting the need for rigorous control and reproducible sampling when obtaining breath samples (Miekisch et al. 2008; O’Hara et al. 2008; Thekedar et al. 2011).

In summary, the ideal breath sampling method would be simple, tailored to personal physiology, allow targeted selection of airway and/or alveolar air (as appropriate to the disease under study), and eliminate sampling from the dead space and environment. This combination is not yet possible, and all current methods necessitate compromise in one or more areas. As breath analysis is currently still in its infancy, and the main aim is biomarker discovery, we would propose that compromises should be minimised (and simplicity in particular sacrificed).

4 Breath collection containers

Direct breath sampling onto pre-concentration materials is possible (Basanta et al. 2010), but a large proportion of the studies reviewed describe temporary storage prior to pre-concentration. The frequency of use for various storage containers is shown Fig. 3b. Polymer bags encompass the majority of breath collection containers; of which Tedlar® bags (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE, USA) are the most commonly used. Other polymer bags include Mylar, and aluminium bags. Bio-VOC™ Sampler (Markes International, Llantrisant, Wales, UK) (a late expiratory breath sampler), breath collection apparatus (BCA, Menssana Research Inc., Newark, NJ, USA), and glass vials (in combination with gas-tight syringes) have also been utilised for breath collection (Rattray et al. 2014). For clinical utility, the ideal collection container should be cost and user-friendly, durable, inert and importantly allow neither ingress of environmental nor egress of breath VOCs. It would also be compatible with multiple VOC trapping devices. As a case study, BCA and Bio-VOC™ Sampler devices have the same aim of collecting late expiratory air. The structure and mechanism of collection already suggests potential differences in collected compounds; i.e., BCA is an extended tubular structure where air flows downstream and the air proximal to the mouth is collected. The Bio-VOC™ Sampler is a small storage reservoir in which air is continuously displaced as exhalation proceeds. The aim of both devices is to capture breath sample that has a greater concentration of preferentially late-expiratory air. To limit condensation, the BCA has a heated component, whilst the Bio-VOC™ Sampler does not and obtained VOC profiles may vary. Other factors such as background or contaminant levels of the container should be considered in order to prevent compromising valuable human samples. Standard guidelines that take into account background contaminants may be useful. The possible variability of the breath sample during storage should also be considered and documented, as it is known that Tedlar® bags absorb some constituents of breath during storage (Beauchamp et al. 2008).

5 Pre-concentration methods

Pre-concentration is often necessary in order to detect VOCs that are present in breath at ppmv and lower concentrations. For some collection methods, dilution of VOCs can occur and this is particularly the case for mixed expiratory breath samples. Commonly used pre-concentration methods include sorbent-containing thermal desorption (TD) tubes, the employment of solid phase microextraction (SPME), as well as needle trap devices (NTDs) and these are discussed below.

5.1 Thermal desorption (TD) tubes

TD tubes are popular for pre-concentrating VOCs and account for almost half of the pre-concentration methods published to date (Fig. 3c). Sorbents can be manually packed into the tubes or tubes can be purchased pre-packed from suppliers. Commonly used sorbents include Tenax TA & GR, Carbograph 5TD, Carboxen. Due to the distinct properties of these materials there is important variability in the range of volatiles that can be trapped, as well as the stability of sorbent-compound interaction. Sample volume should be considered in order to prevent breakthrough and subsequent loss of analytes. Strong sorbents such as Carboxen are suitable for trapping very volatile organic compounds (~C2–C4) while Tenax sorbents trap less volatile VOCs in breath (~C7–C15) (Dettmer and Engewald 2002). Some factors that need to be considered include whether to use single or multi-bed sorbents which will depend on analytes of interest, and also the quantity of sorbent used. Whilst multi-bed sorbents can trap a larger range of different chemical species, both in terms of volatility but also polarity, analyte-sorbent interactions at the interfaces of the packed beds can affect reproducibility and thus compound recovery, and perhaps stability during storage (Kang and Paul Thomas 2016).

When breath has been temporarily stored in for example polymer bags, VOC-capture proceeds by attaching one end of the TD tube to the bag and the other end to a pump which functions to ‘pull breath’ from the bag across the sorbent. Whilst the use of these sorbent-containing TD tubes is stated to be highly sensitive, it can be quite time consuming. Also, sorbents like Carboxen are hydrophilic thus retain moisture which can negatively affect the quantitative capture of some analytes. Introducing a dry-purging step especially when using a hydrophilic sorbent may be a solution (Gawlowski et al. 2000). Concerns such as the stability of VOCs trapped onto sorbent materials, storage and also logistics are apparent. It has been shown that these tubes can be stored for up to 2 weeks prior to analysis (Harshman et al. 2016; van der Schee et al. 2013) whilst another study suggests longer (Kang and Paul Thomas 2016). Samples collected using this method can be analysed in the laboratory present in hospitals provided that the required analytical platform is available which would require a significant investment. Alternatively, tubes can be temporarily stored and sent to laboratories off-site. Either way, this is readily adaptable for use in the clinic.

5.2 Solid phase microextraction (SPME)

SPME is a pre-concentration technique developed by Pawliszyn et al. which has found application for use in breath analysis (Grote and Pawliszyn 1997). It involves exposing a coated fused-silica fibre to the headspace of samples. Coating materials include amongst others polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and polyacrylate (PA). These coatings trap VOCs by absorption/adsorption mechanisms (Vas and Vekey 2004). Sampling is usually completed when equilibrium is established between the fibre and the sample which is stated to be fast in the case of volatile analytes. The time to equilibrium depends on several factors including fibre type, thickness, length, and agitation. Common combinations of SPME coatings, as tabulated in the pre-concentration summaries (Tables 1, 2, 3), include 75 µm/85 µm CAR/PDMS for gases and low molecular weight compounds (MW 30–225), 100 µm PDMS for volatiles (MW 60–275), 65 µm PDMS/DVB for volatiles, amines, & nitro-aromatic compounds (MW 50–300), 85 µm PA for polar semi-volatiles (MW 80–300), 7 µm PDMS for non-polar high molecular weight compounds (MW 125–600), 30 µm PDMS for non-polar semi-volatiles, and 60 µm CW for alcohols and polar compounds (MW 40–275) (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK). This method has been stated to have a comparable sensitivity to TD tubes but may be limited by the amount of coating and thickness of fibres (Vas and Vekey 2004).

5.3 Needle trap devices (NTDs)

NTDs are also utilised for the capture of analytes from exhaled breath. Briefly, sorbent materials are confined within a needle-like device and breath is ‘pulled’ through the needle to capture VOCs. The method aims to encompass the best features from SPME and TD tubes i.e. reduced sampling times while retaining adequate sensitivity (Lord et al. 2010). This method is discussed in detail elsewhere (Filipiak et al. 2012; Trefz et al. 2012, 2013). Similarly to TD tubes, sensitivity can be improved by increasing sampling volume (Trefz et al. 2013). Samples obtained using both SPME (Chai and Pawliszyn 1995; Grote and Pawliszyn 1997) and NTDs (Mieth et al. 2009) are reported to be stable for a couple of hours before significant losses are observed.

6 Recommendations and future directions

We have summarised the analytical pipelines that are commonly utilised for the off-line capture and pre-concentration of breath for VOC analysis. It is clear from this review that prior to conducting a breathomics study, the important sampling considerations include selection of the relevant breath fraction, the type of breath collecting container (if used), and pre-concentration technique.

From this literature survey we have seen that the methods of collecting late expiratory breath differs between studies and this may be due to an actual lack of proper definition and thus may be a contributing factor to the heterogeneous results which are reported (Dent et al. 2013; Phillips et al. 2003; Poli et al. 2005). Some studies associate the term ‘alveolar’ with their breath samples, and although in these studies the first few volumes of captured breath are discarded, this should be considered as late expiratory breath. We consider that breath samples collected under control, such as the CO2 monitoring method shown in Fig. 2 (i.e., from the start to end of phase III), may be described as ‘alveolar’ or end-tidal as the collection of the breath is bespoke to the person under analysis. This is not to suggest that late expiratory breath is not useful. On the contrary, as it does not use such complex CO2 monitoring, it does have the advantages such as ease of collection and it is also inexpensive and these deem it an attractive option. The aforementioned varied late expiratory definitions include different timings for exclusion of dead space air and the use of breath sampling manoeuvres such as breath holding and forced expirations which are stated to influence VOC content (Bikov et al. 2014; Dweik et al. 2011; Larstad et al. 2007; Thekedar et al. 2011) (see ‘Brief description’ in Table 1). This lack of uniformity most likely affects the reproducibility of acquired results. The goal of analysing the late expiratory breath is to capture a sample with a greater endogenous contribution. It would be more useful to obtain this type of sample with confidence using the controls that are available such as capnography or a set-defined late expiratory breath protocol. This is because this is specific to the individual, as each person will have a different breath profile due to size of their lungs, fitness and medication/disease.

Consistency with breath collection containers will also be important. A device having a heating component to prevent or minimise condensation effect and another without this property may culminate in the reporting of different results. Therefore adequate development and handling of these devices is required to maintain quality. Minimisation of condensation, removal of background contaminants and optimisation of storage time should be prioritised before use for studies. (Beauchamp et al. 2008); (Phillips 1997; Phillips et al. 2003). This should also be extended to pre-concentration techniques.

Herbig and Beauchamp suggested a framework for standardisation of reporting for breath sampling methods (Herbig and Beauchamp 2014), whereby the breath type and method of obtaining a breath type are reported to enable comparison between studies. That such standardisation is possible is showcased by the HbA1c test for determining glucose levels in blood. Here also, similar reproducibility difficulties were experienced as a result of varying results across laboratories. This resulted in primary reference laboratories being established to work together nationally and then globally to deliver standardisation of this test (John et al. 2007). Only with cooperation between laboratories can the differences in breath type definition be fully explored and defined. Moreover, direct comparison of collection practices on a global scale will be required to establish a consensus on important parameters.

The need for breath sampling standardisation is stimulating engagement activity within the community as shown by a recent survey (Beauchamp 2015). Recently, a breath sampler was developed with input from a broad consortium of breath researchers and engineers which may aid in contributing to the sought after homogeneity in sampling within the breathomics community (http://www.breathe-free.org). Finally, it is important to acknowledge that the collection of a certain type of breath should be linked to the clinical question under investigation.

7 Summary and conclusion

We have reviewed 110 articles describing various breath sampling methodologies and assessed them in terms of breath type collected, the containers used for collecting breath, and pre-concentration methods employed. It is clear from this research that the breath community need to converge in order to make improvements along the various steps of the breathomics analysis pipeline (as depicted in Fig. 1). We found that late expiratory breath is the most common breath type and is typically obtained based on crude estimations. These estimations of late expiratory breath are different in distinct studies and we suggest that standardisation of analysis protocols should be considered when acquiring this breath type. Breath sampling with the use of some form of guidance to provide confidence would certainly aid in improving the quality of the obtained sample. Focus on the clinical question may also help in determining the best type of breath sample to be collected.

We believe that improvement in quality along the various steps in the pipeline will aid in realising the translational potential of breath research from the laboratory and into the clinic.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the Centre for Information Science at Philips Research Eindhoven for conducting the STN search, and to all consortium partners within the EU FP7 project BreathDx and in particularly those involved within Philips Research and The University of Manchester. This work was funded by the European Union FP7 Marie Curie Actions, under the Industry-Academia Partnerships and Pathways (IAPP) programme (MC-IAPP BreathDx 611951).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required for this investigation.

Research involving human and animal studies

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

11306_2017_1241_MOESM1_ESM.docx (69 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 69 KB)

References

  1. Alonso, M., Castellanos, M., & Sanchez, J. M. (2010). Evaluation of potential breath biomarkers for active smoking: assessment of smoking habits. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 396, 2987–2995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altomare, D. F., Di Lena, M., Porcelli, F., Trizio, L., Travaglio, E., Tutino, M., Dragonieri, S., Memeo, V., & de Gennaro, G. (2013). Exhaled volatile organic compounds identify patients with colorectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 100, 144–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amal, H., Leja, M., Funka, K., Lasina, I., Skapars, R., Sivins, A., Ancans, G., Kikuste, I., Vanags, A., Tolmanis, I., et al. (2016). Breath testing as potential colorectal cancer screening tool. International Journal of Cancer, 138, 229–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. C., Babb, A. L., & Hlastala, M. P. (2003). Modeling soluble gas exchange in the airways and alveoli. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 31, 1402–1422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. C., & Hlastala, M. P. (2007). Breath tests and airway gas exchange. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 20, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bajtarevic, A., Ager, C., Pienz, M., Klieber, M., Schwarz, K., Ligor, M., Ligor, T., Filipiak, W., Denz, H., Fiegl, M., et al. (2009). Noninvasive detection of lung cancer by analysis of exhaled breath. BMC Cancer, 9, 348.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baranska, A., Tigchelaar, E., Smolinska, A., Dallinga, J. W., Moonen, E. J., Dekens, J. A., Wijmenga, C., Zhernakova, A., & van Schooten, F. J. (2013). Profile of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath changes as a result of gluten-free diet. Journal of Breath Research, 7, 037104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barash, O., Zhang, W., Halpern, J. M., Hua, Q. L., Pan, Y. Y., Kayal, H., Khoury, K., Liu, H., Davies, M. P., & Haick, H. (2015). Differentiation between genetic mutations of breast cancer by breath volatolomics. Oncotarget, 6, 44864.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barker, M., Hengst, M., Schmid, J., Buers, H. J., Mittermaier, B., Klemp, D., & Koppmann, R. (2006). Volatile organic compounds in the exhaled breath of young patients with cystic fibrosis. The European Respiratory Journal, 27, 929–936.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basanta, M., Jarvis, R. M., Xu, Y., Blackburn, G., Tal-Singer, R., Woodcock, A., Singh, D., Goodacre, R., Thomas, C.L.P., & Fowler, S. J. (2010). Non-invasive metabolomic analysis of breath using differential mobility spectrometry in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy smokers. The Analyst, 135, 315–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beale, D. J., Jones, O. A., Karpe, A. V., Dayalan, S., Oh, D. Y., Kouremenos, K. A., Ahmed, W., & Palombo, E. A. (2016). A Review of Analytical Techniques and Their Application in Disease Diagnosis in Breathomics and Salivaomics Research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18, 24.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beauchamp, J. (2015). Current sampling and analysis techniques in breath research-results of a task force poll. Journal of Breath Research, 9, 047107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beauchamp, J., Herbig, J., Gutmann, R., & Hansel, A. (2008). On the use of Tedlar (R) bags for breath-gas sampling and analysis. Journal of Breath Research, 2, 046001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berna, A. Z., McCarthy, J. S., Wang, R. X., Saliba, K. J., Bravo, F. G., Cassells, J., Padovan, B., & Trowell, S. C. (2015). Analysis of Breath Specimens for Biomarkers of Plasmodium falciparum Infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 212, 1120–1128.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bigazzi, A. Y., Figliozzi, M. A., Luo, W., & Pankow, J. F. (2016). Breath Biomarkers to Measure Uptake of Volatile Organic Compounds by Bicyclists. Environmental Science & Technology, 50, 5357–5363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bikov, A., Hernadi, M., Korosi, B. Z., Kunos, L., Zsamboki, G., Sutto, Z., Tarnoki, A. D., Tarnoki, D. L., Losonczy, G., & Horvath, I. (2014). Expiratory flow rate, breath hold and anatomic dead space influence electronic nose ability to detect lung cancer. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 14, 202.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boots, A. W., Bos, L. D., van der Schee, M. P., van Schooten, F. J., & Sterk, P. J. (2015). Exhaled molecular fingerprinting in diagnosis and monitoring: Validating volatile promises. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 21, 633–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bos, L. D., Sterk, P. J., & Schultz, M. J. (2013). Volatile metabolites of pathogens: a systematic review. PLoS Pathogens, 9, e1003311.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buszewski, B., Ulanowska, A., Ligor, T., Denderz, N., & Amann, A. (2009). Analysis of exhaled breath from smokers, passive smokers and non-smokers by solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Biomedical Chromatography, 23, 551–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Caldeira, M., Perestrelo, R., Barros, A. S., Bilelo, M. J., Morete, A., Camara, J. S., & Rocha, S. M. (2012). Allergic asthma exhaled breath metabolome: A challenge for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 1254, 87–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Capuano, R., Santonico, M., Pennazza, G., Ghezzi, S., Martinelli, E., Roscioni, C., Lucantoni, G., Galluccio, G., Paolesse, R., Di Natale, C., et al (2015). The lung cancer breath signature: a comparative analysis of exhaled breath and air sampled from inside the lungs. Scientific Reports, 5, 16491.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Castellanos, M., Xifra, G., Fernandez-Real, J. M., & Sanchez, J. M. (2016). Breath gas concentrations mirror exposure to sevoflurane and isopropyl alcohol in hospital environments in non-occupational conditions. Journal of Breath Research, 10, 016001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chai, M., & Pawliszyn, J. (1995). Analysis of environmental air samples by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 29, 693–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Pan, F., Liu, J., Wang, K., Zhang, C., Cheng, S., Lu, L., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., et al. (2016). Breath analysis based on surface-enhanced raman scattering sensors distinguishes early and advanced gastric cancer patients from healthy persons. ACS Nano, 10, 8169–8179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cope, K.A., Watson, M.T., Foster, W.M., Sehnert, S.S., & Risby, T.H. (2004). Effects of ventilation on the collection of exhaled breath in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985), 96, 1371–1379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Corradi, M., Poli, D., Banda, I., Bonini, S., Mozzoni, P., Pinelli, S., Alinovi, R., Andreoli, R., Ampollini, L., Casalini, A., et al. (2015). Exhaled breath analysis in suspected cases of non-small-cell lung cancer: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Breath Research, 9, 027101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Costello, B. D., Amann, A., Al-Kateb, H., Flynn, C., Filipiak, W., Khalid, T., Osborne, D., & Ratcliffe, N. M. (2014). A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body. Journal of Breath Research, 8, 014001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dadamio, J., Van den Velde, S., Laleman, W., Van Hee, P., Coucke, W., Nevens, F., & Quirynen, M. (2012). Breath biomarkers of liver cirrhosis. Journal of Chromatography B, 905, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dallinga, J. W., Robroeks, C. M., van Berkel, J. J., Moonen, E. J., Godschalk, R. W., Jobsis, Q., Dompeling, E., Wouters, E. F., & van Schooten, F. J. (2010). Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath as a diagnostic tool for asthma in children. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 40, 68–76.Google Scholar
  30. Das, M. K., Bishwal, S. C., Das, A., Dabral, D., Varshney, A., Badireddy, V. K., & Nanda, R. (2014). Investigation of gender-specific exhaled breath volatome in humans by GCxGC-TOF-MS. Analytical Chemistry, 86, 1229–1237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Deng, C., Zhang, J., Yu, X., Zhang, W., & Zhang, X. (2004). Determination of acetone in human breath by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and solid-phase microextraction with on-fiber derivatization. Journal of Chromatography B, 810, 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dent, A.G., Sutedja, T.G., & Zimmerman, P.V. (2013). Exhaled breath analysis for lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 5 Suppl 5, S540–S550.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Dettmer, K., & Engewald, W. (2002). Adsorbent materials commonly used in air analysis for adsorptive enrichment and thermal desorption of volatile organic compounds. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 373, 490–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dweik, R. A., Boggs, P. B., Erzurum, S. C., Irvin, C. G., Leigh, M. W., Lundberg, J. O., Olin, A. C., Plummer, A. L., Taylor, D. R., & Interpretat, A.T.S.C. (2011). An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 184, 602–615.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Erhart, S., Amann, A., Haberlandt, E., Edlinger, G., Schmid, A., Filipiak, W., Schwarz, K., Mochalski, P., Rostasy, K., Karall, D., et al. (2009). 3-Heptanone as a potential new marker for valproic acid therapy. Journal of Breath Research, 3, 016004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Filipiak, W., Beer, R., Sponring, A., Filipiak, A., Ager, C., Schiefecker, A., Lanthaler, S., Helbok, R., Nagl, M., Troppmair, J., et al. (2015). Breath analysis for in vivo detection of pathogens related to ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care patients: a prospective pilot study. Journal of Breath Research, 9, 016004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Filipiak, W., Filipiak, A., Ager, C., Wiesenhofer, H., & Amann, A. (2012). Optimization of sampling parameters for collection and preconcentration of alveolar air by needle traps. Journal of Breath Research, 6, 027107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Filipiak, W., Filipiak, A., Sponring, A., Schmid, T., Zelger, B., Ager, C., Klodzinska, E., Denz, H., Pizzini, A., Lucciarini, P., et al. (2014). Comparative analyses of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from patients, tumors and transformed cell lines for the validation of lung cancer-derived breath markers. Journal of Breath Research, 8, 027111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fuchs, P., Loeseken, C., Schubert, J. K., & Miekisch, W. (2010). Breath gas aldehydes as biomarkers of lung cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 126, 2663–2670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gaida, A., Holz, O., Nell, C., Schuchardt, S., Lavae-Mokhtari, B., Kruse, L., Boas, U., Langejuergen, J., Allers, M., Zimmermann, S., et al. (2016). A dual center study to compare breath volatile organic compounds from smokers and non-smokers with and without COPD. Journal of Breath Research, 10, 026006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Garcia, R. A., Morales, V., Martin, S., Vilches, E., & Toledano, A. (2014). Volatile organic compounds analysis in breath air in healthy volunteers and patients suffering epidermoid laryngeal carcinomas. Chromatographia, 77, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gawlowski, J., Gierczak, T., Pietruszynska, Z., Gawrys, M., & Niedzielski, J. (2000). Dry purge for the removal of water from the solid sorbents used to sample volatile organic compounds from the atmospheric air. The Analyst, 125, 2112–2117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goerl, T., Kischkel, S., Sawacki, A., Fuchs, P., Miekisch, W., & Schubert, J. K. (2013). Volatile breath biomarkers for patient monitoring during haemodialysis. Journal of Breath Research, 7, 017116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goodacre, R. (2007). Metabolomics of a superorganism. The Journal of Nutrition, 137, 259S–266S.Google Scholar
  45. Gordon, S. M., Szidon, J. P., Krotoszynski, B. K., Gibbons, R. D., & O’Neill, H. J. (1985). Volatile organic compounds in exhaled air from patients with lung cancer. Clinical Chemistry, 31, 1278–1282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gordon, S. M., Wallace, L. A., Brinkman, M. C., Callahan, P. J., & Kenny, D. V. (2002). Volatile organic compounds as breath biomarkers for active and passive smoking. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 689–698.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gordon, S. M., Wallace, L. A., Pellizzari, E. D., & Oneill, H. J. (1988). Human breath measurements in a clean-air chamber to determine half-lives for volatile organic-compounds. Atmospheric Environment, 22, 2165–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grabowska-Polanowska, B., Faber, J., Skowron, M., Miarka, P., Pietrzycka, A., Sliwka, I., & Amann, A. (2013). Detection of potential chronic kidney disease markers in breath using gas chromatography with mass-spectral detection coupled with thermal desorption method. Journal of Chromatography A, 1301, 179–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grote, C., & Pawliszyn, J. (1997). Solid-phase microextraction for the analysis of human breath. Analytical Chemistry, 69, 587–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gruber, B., Keller, S., Groeger, T., Matuschek, G., Szymczak, W., & Zimmermann, R. (2016). Breath gas monitoring during a glucose challenge by a combined PTR-QMS/GCxGC-TOFMS approach for the verification of potential volatile biomarkers. Journal of Breath Research, 10, 036003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gruber, M., Tisch, U., Jeries, R., Amal, H., Hakim, M., Ronen, O., Marshak, T., Zimmerman, D., Israel, O., Amiga, E., et al. (2014). Analysis of exhaled breath for diagnosing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a feasibility study. British Journal of Cancer, 111, 790–798.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Guo, L., Wang, C., Chi, C., Wang, X., Liu, S., Zhao, W., Ke, C., Xu, G., & Li, E. (2015). Exhaled breath volatile biomarker analysis for thyroid cancer. Translational Research, 166, 188–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hakim, M., Billan, S., Tisch, U., Peng, G., Dvrokind, I., Marom, O., Abdah-Bortnyak, R., Kuten, A., & Haick, H. (2011). Diagnosis of head-and-neck cancer from exhaled breath. British Journal of Cancer, 104, 1649–1655.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harshman, S. W., Geier, B. A., Fan, M., Rinehardt, S., Watts, B. S., Drummond, L. A., Preti, G., Phillips, J. B., Ott, D. K., & Grigsby, C. C. (2015). The identification of hypoxia biomarkers from exhaled breath under normobaric conditions. Journal of Breath Research, 9, 047103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Harshman, S. W., Mani, N., Geier, B. A., Kwak, J., Shepard, P., Fan, M., Sudberry, G. L., Mayes, R. S., Ott, D. K., Martin, J. A., et al. (2016). Storage stability of exhaled breath on Tenax TA. Journal of Breath Research, 10, 046008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Henderson, K. A., & Matthews, I. P. (2002). Biological monitoring of midwives’ exposure to N(2)O using the Bio-VOC breath sampler. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 12, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Herbig, J., & Beauchamp, J. (2014). Towards standardization in the analysis of breath gas volatiles. Journal of Breath Research, 8, 037101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hyspler, R., Crhova, S., Gasparic, J., Zadak, Z., Cizkova, M., & Balasova, V. (2000). Determination of isoprene in human expired breath using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B, 739, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ibrahim, B., Basanta, M., Cadden, P., Singh, D., Douce, D., Woodcock, A., & Fowler, S. J. (2011). Non-invasive phenotyping using exhaled volatile organic compounds in asthma. Thorax, 66, 804–809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jareno-Esteban, J. J., Munoz-Lucas, M. A., Carrillo-Aranda, B., Maldonado-Sanz, J. A., de Granda-Orive, I., Aguilar-Ros, A., Civera-Tejuca, C., Gutierrez-Ortega, C., Callol-Sanchez, L. M., & Study, G. (2013). Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath in a healthy population: effect of tobacco smoking. Archivos de Bronconeumologia, 49, 457–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. John, W. G., Mosca, A., Weykamp, C., & Goodall, I. (2007). HbA1c standardisation: History, science and politics. The Clinical Biochemist Reviews, 28, 163–168.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Jones, A. W. (1983). Role of rebreathing in determination of the blood-breath ratio of expired ethanol. Journal of Applied Physiology, 55, 1237–1241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Jones, A.W., Mardh, G., & Anggard, E. (1983). Determination of endogenous ethanol in blood and breath by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 18 Suppl 1, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kang, S., & Paul Thomas, C. L. (2016). How long may a breath sample be stored for at −80 degrees C? A study of the stability of volatile organic compounds trapped onto a mixed Tenax:Carbograph trap adsorbent bed from exhaled breath. Journal of Breath Research, 10, 026011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Khalid, T. Y., Costello, B., Ewen, R., White, P., Stevens, S., Gordon, F., Collins, P., McCune, A., Shenoy, A., Shetty, S., et al. (2013). Breath volatile analysis from patients diagnosed with harmful drinking, cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy: A pilot study. Metabolomics, 9, 938–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. King, J., Mochalski, P., Kupferthaler, A., Unterkofler, K., Koc, H., Filipiak, W., Teschl, S., Hinterhuber, H., & Amann, A. (2010). Dynamic profiles of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath as determined by a coupled PTR-MS/GC-MS study. Physiological Measurement, 31, 1169–1184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kischkel, S., Miekisch, W., Fuchs, P., & Schubert, J. K. (2012). Breath analysis during one-lung ventilation in cancer patients. European Respiratory Journal, 40, 706–713.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kramer, R., Sauer-Heilborn, A., Welte, T., Guzman, C. A., Hofle, M. G., & Abraham, W. R. (2015). A rapid method for breath analysis in cystic fibrosis patients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 34, 745–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kwak, J., Fan, M., Harshman, S. W., Garrison, C. E., Dershem, V. L., Phillips, J. B., Grigsby, C. C., & Ott, D. K. (2014). Evaluation of bio-VOC sampler for analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath. Metabolites, 4, 879–888.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Larstad, M. A., Toren, K., Bake, B., & Olin, A. C. (2007). Determination of ethane, pentane and isoprene in exhaled air-effects of breath-holding, flow rate and purified air. Acta Physiologica, 189, 87–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Libardoni, M., Stevens, P. T., Waite, J. H., & Sacks, R. (2006). Analysis of human breath samples with a multi-bed sorption trap and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC). Journal of Chromatography B, 842, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ligor, M., Ligor, T., Bajtarevic, A., Ager, C., Pienz, M., Klieber, M., Denz, H., Fiegl, M., Hilbe, W., Weiss, W., et al. (2009). Determination of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of patients with lung cancer using solid phase microextraction & gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 47, 550–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ligor, T., Szeliga, J., Jackowski, M., & Buszewski, B. (2007). Preliminary study of volatile organic compounds from breath and stomach tissue by means of solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Breath Research, 1, 016001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lord, H. L., Zhan, W. Q., & Pawliszyn, J. (2010). Fundamentals and applications of needle trap devices A critical review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 677, 3–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lourenco, C., & Turner, C. (2014). Breath analysis in disease diagnosis: methodological considerations and applications. Metabolites, 4, 465–498.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ma, H. Y., Li, X., Chen, J. M., Wang, H. J., Cheng, T. T., Chen, K., & Xu, S. F. (2014). Analysis of human breath samples of lung cancer patients and healthy controls with solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and flow-modulated comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC x GC). Analytical Methods, 6, 6841–6849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Machado, R. F., Laskowski, D., Deffenderfer, O., Burch, T., Zheng, S., Mazzone, P. J., Mekhail, T., Jennings, C., Stoller, J. K., Pyle, J., et al. (2005). Detection of lung cancer by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 171, 1286–1291.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mangler, M., Freitag, C., Lanowska, M., Staeck, O., Schneider, A., & Speiser, D. (2012). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath of patients with breast cancer in a clinical setting. Ginekologia Polska, 83, 730–736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Marco, E., & Grimalt, J. O. (2015). A rapid method for the chromatographic analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of tobacco cigarette and electronic cigarette smokers. Journal of Chromatography A, 1410, 51–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Martin, A. N., Farquar, G. R., Jones, A. D., & Frank, M. (2010). Human breath analysis: methods for sample collection and reduction of localized background effects. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 396, 739–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Miekisch, W., Hengstenberg, A., Kischkel, S., Beckmann, U., Mieth, M., & Schubert, J. K. (2010). Construction and evaluation of a versatile co2 controlled breath collection device. IEEE Sensors Journal, 10, 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Miekisch, W., Kischkel, S., Sawacki, A., Liebau, T., Mieth, M., & Schubert, J. K. (2008). Impact of sampling procedures on the results of breath analysis. Journal of Breath Research, 2, 026007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mieth, M., Kischkel, S., Schubert, J. K., Hein, D., & Miekisch, W. (2009). Multibed needle trap devices for on site sampling and preconcentration of volatile breath biomarkers. Analytical Chemistry, 81, 5851–5857.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mieth, M., Schubert, J. K., Groger, T., Sabel, B., Kischkel, S., Fuchs, P., Hein, D., Zimmermann, R., & Miekisch, W. (2010). Automated needle trap heart-cut GC/MS and needle trap comprehensive two-dimensional GC/TOF-MS for breath gas analysis in the clinical environment. Analytical Chemistry, 82, 2541–2551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Minh, T. D., Oliver, S. R., Ngo, J., Flores, R., Midyett, J., Meinardi, S., Carlson, M. K., Rowland, F. S., Blake, D. R., & Galassetti, P. R. (2011). Noninvasive measurement of plasma glucose from exhaled breath in healthy and type 1 diabetic subjects. American Journal of Physiology–Endocrinology and Metabolism, 300, E1166–E1175.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mochalski, P., King, J., Haas, M., Unterkofler, K., Amann, A., & Mayer, G. (2014). Blood and breath profiles of volatile organic compounds in patients with end-stage renal disease. BMC Nephrology, 15, 43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mochalski, P., King, J., Klieber, M., Unterkofler, K., Hinterhuber, H., Baumann, M., & Amann, A. (2013). Blood and breath levels of selected volatile organic compounds in healthy volunteers. The Analyst, 138, 2134–2145.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Moretti, M., Phillips, M., Abouzeid, A., Cataneo, R. N., & Greenberg, J. (2004). Increased breath markers of oxidative stress in normal pregnancy and in preeclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 190, 1184–1190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. O’Hara, M. E., O’Hehir, S., Green, S., & Mayhew, C. A. (2008). Development of a protocol to measure volatile organic compounds in human breath: a comparison of rebreathing and on-line single exhalations using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Physiological Measurement, 29, 309–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ohlsson, J., Ralph, D. D., Mandelkorn, M. A., Babb, A. L., & Hlastala, M. P. (1990). Accurate measurement of blood alcohol concentration with isothermal rebreathing. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 51, 6–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pabst, F., Miekisch, W., Fuchs, P., Kischkel, S., & Schubert, J. K. (2007). Monitoring of oxidative and metabolic stress during cardiac surgery by means of breath biomarkers: an observational study. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2, 37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Peled, N., Hakim, M., Bunn, P. A. Jr., Miller, Y. E., Kennedy, T. C., Mattei, J., Mitchell, J. D., Hirsch, F. R., & Haick, H. (2012). Non-invasive breath analysis of pulmonary nodules. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 7, 1528–1533.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Peng, G., Hakim, M., Broza, Y. Y., Billan, S., Abdah-Bortnyak, R., Kuten, A., Tisch, U., & Haick, H. (2010). Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors. British Journal of Cancer, 103, 542–551.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Phillips, C., Mac Parthalain, N., Syed, Y., Deganello, D., Claypole, T., & Lewis, K. (2014). Short-term intra-subject variation in exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in COPD patients and healthy controls and its effect on disease classification. Metabolites, 4, 300–318.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Phillips, M. (1992). Breath Tests in Medicine. Scientific American, 267, 74–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Phillips, M. (1997). Method for the collection and assay of volatile organic compounds in breath. Analytical Biochemistry, 247, 272–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Phillips, M., Cataneo, R. N., Cummin, A. R., Gagliardi, A. J., Gleeson, K., Greenberg, J., Maxfield, R. A., & Rom, W. N. (2003). Detection of lung cancer with volatile markers in the breath. Chest, 123, 2115–2123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pijls, K. E., Smolinska, A., Jonkers, D. M., Dallinga, J. W., Masclee, A. A., Koek, G. H., & van Schooten, F. J. (2016). A profile of volatile organic compounds in exhaled air as a potential non-invasive biomarker for liver cirrhosis. Scientific Reports, 6, 19903.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Poli, D., Carbognani, P., Corradi, M., Goldoni, M., Acampa, O., Balbi, B., Bianchi, L., Rusca, M., & Mutti, A. (2005). Exhaled volatile organic compounds in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: cross sectional and nested short-term follow-up study. Respiratory Research, 6, 71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Poli, D., Goldoni, M., Caglieri, A., Ceresa, G., Acampa, O., Carbognani, P., Rusca, M., & Corradi, M. (2008). Breath analysis in non small cell lung cancer patients after surgical tumour resection. Acta Biomedica, 79 Suppl 1, 64–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Prado, C., Marin, P., & Periago, J. F. (2003). Application of solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to the determination of volatile organic compounds in end-exhaled breath samples. Journal of chromatography A, 1011, 125–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Preti, G., Labows, J. N., Kostelc, J. G., Aldinger, S., & Daniele, R. (1988). Analysis of lung air from patients with bronchogenic carcinoma and controls using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B, 432, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Raninen, K. J., Lappi, J. E., Mukkala, M. L., Tuomainen, T. P., Mykkanen, H. M., Poutanen, K. S., & Raatikainen, O. J. (2016). Fiber content of diet affects exhaled breath volatiles in fasting and postprandial state in a pilot crossover study. Nutrition Research, 36, 612–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rattray, N. J., Hamrang, Z., Trivedi, D. K., Goodacre, R., & Fowler, S. J. (2014). Taking your breath away: metabolomics breathes life in to personalized medicine. Trends in Biotechnology, 32, 538–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Robroeks, C. M., van Berkel, J. J., Dallinga, J. W., Jobsis, Q., Zimmermann, L. J., Hendriks, H. J., Wouters, M. F., van der Grinten, C. P., van de Kant, K. D., van Schooten, F. J., et al. (2010). Metabolomics of volatile organic compounds in cystic fibrosis patients and controls. Pediatric Research, 68, 75–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rudnicka, J., Kowalkowski, T., Ligor, T., & Buszewski, B. (2011). Determination of volatile organic compounds as biomarkers of lung cancer by SPME-GC-TOF/MS and chemometrics. Journal of Chromatography B, 879, 3360–3366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Salvo, P., Ferrari, C., Persia, R., Ghimenti, S., Lomonaco, T., Bellagambi, F., & Di Francesco, F. (2015). A dual mode breath sampler for the collection of the end-tidal and dead space fractions. Medical Engineering & Physics, 37, 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sanchez, J. M., & Sacks, R. D. (2006). Development of a multibed sorption trap, comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography, and time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in human breath. Analytical Chemistry, 78, 3046–3054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Santonico, M., Lucantoni, G., Pennazza, G., Capuano, R., Galluccio, G., Roscioni, C., La Delfa, G., Consoli, D., Martinelli, E., Paolesse, R., et al (2012). In situ detection Of lung cancer volatile fingerprints using bronchoscopic air-sampling. Lung Cancer, 77, 46–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schallschmidt, K., Becker, R., Jung, C., Bremser, W., Walles, T., Neudecker, J., Leschber, G., Frese, S., & Nehls, I. (2016). Comparison of volatile organic compounds from lung cancer patients and healthy controls-challenges and limitations of an observational study. Journal of Breath Research, 10, 046007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schubert, J. K., Miekisch, W., Birken, T., Geiger, K., & Noldge-Schomburg, G. F. (2005). Impact of inspired substance concentrations on the results of breath analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Biomarkers, 10, 138–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schulz, S., & Dickschat, J. S. (2007). Bacterial volatiles: the smell of small organisms. Natural Product Reports, 24, 814–842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Scott-Thomas, A., Epton, M., & Chambers, S. (2013). Validating a breath collection and analysis system for the new tuberculosis breath test. Journal of Breath Research, 7, 037108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Smolinska, A., Klaassen, E. M., Dallinga, J. W., van de Kant, K. D., Jobsis, Q., Moonen, E. J., van Schayck, O. C., Dompeling, E., & van Schooten, F. J. (2014). Profiling of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath as a strategy to find early predictive signatures of asthma in children. PLoS ONE, 9, e95668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Song, G., Qin, T., Liu, H., Xu, G. B., Pan, Y. Y., Xiong, F. X., Gu, K. S., Sun, G. P., & Chen, Z. D. (2010). Quantitative breath analysis of volatile organic compounds of lung cancer patients. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 67, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Stein, V. B., Narang, R. S., Wilson, L., & Aldous, K. M. (1996). A simple, reliable method for the determination of chlorinated volatile organics in human breath and air using glass sampling tubes. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 20, 145–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sukul, P., Schubert, J. K., Oertel, P., Kamysek, S., Taunk, K., Trefz, P., & Miekisch, W. (2016). FEV manoeuvre induced changes in breath VOC compositions: An unconventional view on lung function tests. Scientific Reports, 6, 28029.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sukul, P., Trefz, P., Schubert, J. K., & Miekisch, W. (2014). Immediate effects of breath holding maneuvers onto composition of exhaled breath. Journal of Breath Research, 8, 037102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Svensson, S., Larstad, M., Broo, K., & Olin, A. C. (2007). Determination of aldehydes in human breath by on-fibre derivatization, solid-phase microextraction and GC-MS. Journal of Chromatography B, 860, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Syhre, M., Manning, L., Phuanukoonnon, S., Harino, P., & Chambers, S. T. (2009). The scent of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-part II breath. Tuberculosis, 89, 263–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Tangerman, A., Meuwese-Arends, M. T., & van Tongeren, J. H. (1983). A new sensitive assay for measuring volatile sulphur compounds in human breath by Tenax trapping and gas chromatography and its application in liver cirrhosis. Clinica Chimica Acta, 130, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Thekedar, B., Oeh, U., Szymczak, W., Hoeschen, C., & Paretzke, H. G. (2011). Influences of mixed expiratory sampling parameters on exhaled volatile organic compound concentrations. Journal of Breath Research, 5, 016001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Thomas, K. W., Pellizzari, E. D., & Cooper, S. D. (1991). A canister-based method for collection and GC/MS analysis of volatile organic compounds in human breath. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 15, 54–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Trefz, P., Kischkel, S., Hein, D., James, E. S., Schubert, J. K., & Miekisch, W. (2012). Needle trap micro-extraction for VOC analysis: effects of packing materials and desorption parameters. Journal of Chromatography A, 1219, 29–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Trefz, P., Rosner, L., Hein, D., Schubert, J. K., & Miekisch, W. (2013). Evaluation of needle trap micro-extraction and automatic alveolar sampling for point-of-care breath analysis. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 405, 5617–5617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Turner, M. A., Guallar-Hoyas, C., Kent, A. L., Wilson, I. D., & Thomas, C. L. (2011). Comparison of metabolomic profiles obtained using chemical ionization and electron ionization MS in exhaled breath. Bioanalysis, 3, 2731–2738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Ueta, I., Mizuguchi, A., Okamoto, M., Sakamaki, H., Hosoe, M., Ishiguro, M., & Saito, Y. (2014). Determination of breath isoprene and acetone concentration with a needle-type extraction device in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Clinica Chimica Acta, 430, 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Ulanowska, A., Kowalkowski, T., Hrynkiewicz, K., Jackowski, M., & Buszewski, B. (2011). Determination of volatile organic compounds in human breath for Helicobacter pylori detection by SPME-GC/MS. Biomedical Chromatography, 25, 391–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Ulanowska, A., Trawinska, E., Sawrycki, P., & Buszewski, B. (2012). Chemotherapy control by breath profile with application of SPME-GC/MS method. Journal of Separation Science, 35, 2908–2913.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Van Berkel, J. J., Dallinga, J. W., Moller, G. M., Godschalk, R. W., Moonen, E. J., Wouters, E. F., & Van Schooten, F. J. (2010). A profile of volatile organic compounds in breath discriminates COPD patients from controls. Respiratory Medicine, 104, 557–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. van de Kant, K. D., van Berkel, J. J., Jobsis, Q., Lima Passos, V., Klaassen, E. M., van der Sande, L., van Schayck, O. C., de Jongste, J. C., van Schooten, F. J., Derks, E., et al. (2013). Exhaled breath profiling in diagnosing wheezy preschool children. The European Respiratory Journal, 41, 183–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. van den Velde, S., Quirynen, M., van Hee, P., & van Steenberghe, D. (2007). Halitosis associated volatiles in breath of healthy subjects. Journal of Chromatography B, 853, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. van der Schee, M. P., Fens, N., Brinkman, P., Bos, L. D., Angelo, M. D., Nijsen, T. M., Raabe, R., Knobel, H. H., Vink, T. J., & Sterk, P. J. (2013). Effect of transportation and storage using sorbent tubes of exhaled breath samples on diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose analysis. Journal of Breath Research, 7, 016002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Vas, G., & Vekey, K. (2004). Solid-phase microextraction: a powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis. Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 39, 233–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Verdam, F. J., Dallinga, J. W., Driessen, A., de Jonge, C., Moonen, E. J., van Berkel, J. B., Luijk, J., Bouvy, N. D., Buurman, W. A., Rensen, S. S., et al. (2013). Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a non-invasive diagnosis by analysis of exhaled breath. Journal of Hepatology, 58, 543–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wang, C., Ke, C., Wang, X., Chi, C., Guo, L., Luo, S., Guo, Z., Xu, G., Zhang, F., & Li, E. (2014). Noninvasive detection of colorectal cancer by analysis of exhaled breath. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 406, 4757–4763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Wang, D., Yu, K., Wang, L., Zou, Y., Zhao, C., Zhang, X., Wang, P., & Ying, K. (2012). The analysis of volatile organic compounds biomarkers for lung cancer in exhaled breath, tissues and cell lines. Cancer Biomarkers, 11, 129–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Xu, Z. Q., Broza, Y. Y., Ionsecu, R., Tisch, U., Ding, L., Liu, H., Song, Q., Pan, Y. Y., Xiong, F. X., Gu, K. S., et al. (2013). A nanomaterial-based breath test for distinguishing gastric cancer from benign gastric conditions. British Journal of Cancer, 108, 941–950.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Zaric, B., Petrovic, S., Bjekic, M., Rajic, I., Popovic, A., & Dordevic, D. (2014). Analysis of human exhaled breath in a population of young volunteers. Archives of Biological Science, 66, 1529–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Zeliger, H. I., Pan, Y., & Rea, W. J. (2012). Predicting co-morbidities in chemically sensitive individuals from exhaled breath analysis. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 5, 123–126.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oluwasola Lawal
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Waqar M. Ahmed
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tamara M. E. Nijsen
    • 2
  • Royston Goodacre
    • 3
  • Stephen J. Fowler
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Philips ResearchRoyal Philips B.V.EindhovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.School of Chemistry, Manchester Institute of BiotechnologyThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  4. 4.Manchester Academic Health Science CentreThe University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations