Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 195, Issue 1–4, pp 345–352 | Cite as

COD Reduction in Semiconductor Wastewater by Natural and Commercialized Coagulants Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Fatehah Mohd Omar
  • Nik Norulaini Nik Abdul Rahman
  • Anees AhmadEmail author
Article

Abstract

A coagulation treatment study was conducted using both natural (sago and potato flour) and commercial (poly aluminum chloride and aluminum sulfate) coagulants in semiconductor wastewater. The effects for settling time and dosage of the coagulants as well as their interactions on the reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and turbidity were investigated using a three level factorial design, Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Sago concentration showed more influence on the COD and turbidity reduction than settling time, with concentrations lower than 1.5 g L−1 giving the better reduction. The interaction of settling time and concentration on the COD and turbidity were observed when using potato starch. Concentrations higher than 1.5 g L−1 potato starch reduced the COD and turbidity better. The polyaluminium chloride and ammonium sulphate revealed that lower concentrations (0.02–1.0 g L−1) and longer settling time (30–60 min) gave the greatest reduction in COD and turbidity.

Keywords

Semiconductor-wastewater COD-reduction Response Surface Methodology Natural and Commercial Coagulant 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Advanced Micro Devices (M) Sdn. Bhd. (under the grant (304/PJJAUH/650309.A106) for the financial support of this work.

References

  1. Aguilar, M. I., Saez, J., Llorens, M., Soler, A., & Ortuno, J. F. (2003). Microscopic observations of particle reduction in slaughterhouse wastewater by coagulation-flocculation using ferric sulphate as coagulant and different coagulant aids. Water Research, 37, 2233–2241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bratskaya, S., Schwarz, S., Liebert, T., & Heinze, T. (2005). Starch derivatives of high degree of functionalization 10. Flocculation of kaolin dispersions. Colloids and Surfaces. A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 254, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hollingsworth, J., Sierra-Alvarez, R., Zhou, M., Ogden, K. L., & Field, J. A. (2005). Anaerobic biodegradability and methanogenic toxicity of key constituents in copper chemical mechanical planarization effluents of the semiconductor industry. Chemosphere, 59, 1219–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lai, C. L., & Lin, S. H. (2003). Electrocoagulation of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) wastewater from semiconductor fabrication. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 95, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lai, C. L., & Lin, S. H. (2004). Treatment of chemical mechanical polishing wastewater by electrocoagulation system performances and sludge settling characteristics. Chemosphere, 54, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lin, S. H., & Yang, C. R. (2004). Chemical and physical treatments of chemical mechanical polishing wastewater from semiconductor fabrication. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B108, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Muyibi, S. A., & Evison, L. M. (1995). Optimizing physical parameters affecting coagulation of turbid water with Moringa oleifera seeds. Water Research, 29, 2689–2695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Muyibi, S. A., & Okuofu, C. A. (1995). Coagulation of low turbidity of surface waters with moringa oleifera seeds. The International Journal of Environmental Studies, 48, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ndabigengesere, A., Narasiah, K. S., & Talbot, B. G. (1995). Active agents and mechanism of coagulation of turbid waters using Moringa oleifera. Water Research, 29(2), 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nik Norulaini, N. A., Fatehah, M. O., Teng, T. T., Norli, I., & Sabrina, K. (2005). Induction of silica settling in wafer washing using pH adjustment, Seminar Kebangsaan Ke 4: Pengurusan Persekitaran 2005, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, pp. 279–288.Google Scholar
  11. O’ Melia, C. R. (1972). Coagulation and flocculation. In W. J. Weber (Ed.), Physicochemical process for water quality. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  12. Rossini, M., Garrido, J. C., & Galluzzo, M. (1999). Optimization of the coagulant-flocculation treatment influence of rapid mix parameters. Water Research, 33(8), 1817–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tanyildizi, M. S., Őzer, D., & Elibol, M. (2005). Optimization of α-amylose production by Bacillus sp. using response surface methodology. Process Biochemistry, 40, 2291–2296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weber, W. J. (1972). Physicochemical processes fro water quality control. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  15. Wu, M., Sun, D., & Tay, J. H. (2004). Process-to-process recycling of high-purity water from semiconductor wafer backgrinding wastes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatehah Mohd Omar
    • 2
  • Nik Norulaini Nik Abdul Rahman
    • 1
  • Anees Ahmad
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Biological Science Division, School of Distance EducationUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.Environmental Technology Division, School of Industrial TechnologyUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations