Water Resources Management

, Volume 25, Issue 15, pp 3977–3992

Sustainable Catchment Managing in a Climate Changing World: New Integrative Modalities for Connecting Policy Makers, Scientists and Other Stakeholders

  • Ray Ison
  • Kevin Collins
  • John Colvin
  • Janice Jiggins
  • Pier Paolo Roggero
  • Giovanna Seddaiu
  • Patrick Steyaert
  • Marco Toderi
  • Chiara Zanolla
Article

Abstract

This paper characterises some of the main issues confronting water-catchment managing in a climate-changing world and addresses wide-spread concerns about the lack of connectivity between science, policy making and implementation. The paper’s arguments are ‘framed’ within a paradigm of systemic and adaptive governing, regulating, planning and managing understood as a nested systemic hierarchy. It is argued that climate change adaptation is best understood as a coevolutionary dynamic, principally, but not exclusively between human beings and the biophysical world. Two forms of ‘knowledge brokerage’ based on mode 1 (knowledge) and mode 2 (knowing) are distinguished with practical implications. Drawing on extensive research by the authors, eight modalities for enacting ‘knowledge brokerage’ are introduced. The conditions for or against success in employing these modalities are described. Consistent with the views of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Report 2007, it is argued that water managing is a paradigmatic domain for making climate change adaptation ‘real’ and a systemic issue of global concern at the core of sustainable development.

Keywords

Water governance Catchment managing Watershed managing Knowledge management Social-ecological thinking Dualism Duality 

References

  1. Allan C (2007) Exploring natural resource management with metaphor analysis. Soc Nat Resour 20:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anon (2007) Research for sustainable development: how to enhance connectivity? In: Report of an EC Workshop, 7–8 June 2007, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  3. Bawden R (2010) The community challenge: the learning response. In: Blackmore CP (ed) Social learning systems and communities of practice. Springer, London, pp 39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackmore CP (2010) Social learning systems and communities of practice. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunner RD (2006) A paradigm for practice. Policy Sci 39:135–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CEC (2007) Towards sustainable water management in the European Union—first stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC. CEC, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. CEC (2009) Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action. Climate Change and Water, Coasts and Marine Issues Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the White Paper. SEC(2009) 386/2, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. Checkland PB (ed) (1999) Soft systems methodology: a 30 year retrospective. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins KB, Ison RL (2009) Living with environmental change: adaptation as social learning. Editorial, Special Edition. Environ Policy Govern 19:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins KB, Ison RL (2010) Trusting emergence: Some experiences of learning about integrated catchment science with the Environment Agency of England and Wales. Water Resour Manag 24:669–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins KB, Blackmore CP, Morris D, Watson D (2007) A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: some findings from three UK case studies. Environ Sci Policy 10:564–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins KB, Colvin J, Ison RL (2009) Building ‘learning catchments’ for integrated catchment managing: designing learning systems and networks based on experiences in the UK, South Africa and Australia. Water Sci Technol 59:687–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colvin J, Ballim F, Chimbuya S, Everard M, Goss J, Klarenberg G, Ndlovu S, Ncala D, Weston D (2008) Building capacity for co-operative governance as a basis for Integrated Water Resources Managing in the Inkomati and Mvoti Catchments, South Africa. Water SA 34:681–689Google Scholar
  14. DEAT (2007) Long term mitigation scenarios: technical summary, scenario building team. Department of Environment Affairs and Tourism, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  15. DEAT (2008) Government’s vision, strategic direction and framework for climate policy. Department of Environment Affairs and Tourism, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  16. DeYoe D, Hollstedt C (2004) A knowledge exchange system: putting innovation to work. BC J Ecosyst Manag 4:73–82Google Scholar
  17. EC (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2011
  18. EU SDS (2006) renewed sustainable development strategy: European council DOC 10117/06. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/. Accessed 18 April 2011
  19. Everard M, Colvin J, Mander M, Dickens C, Chimbuya S (2009) Integrated catchment value systems. J Water Resour Protect 3:174–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. François C (1997) International encyclopedia of systems and cybernetics. K. G. Saur, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  21. Galaz V (2005) Does the EC Water Framework Directive build resilience? Harnessing socio-ecological complexity in European water management. Resilience and Freshwater Initiative Policy Paper. Swedish Water House, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge—the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Godden L, Ison RL (2010) From water supply to water governance. In: Davis M, Lyons M (eds) More than luck. Ideas Australia needs now. Centre for Policy Development, Sydney, pp 177–184Google Scholar
  24. Hatchuel A, Le Masson P (2008) A model of intensive innovation competition: design function and design regimes. In: Conference Server @ “Federico Caffe”, EAEPE 2008 Conference, RomeGoogle Scholar
  25. Hussey K, Dovers S (2007) Managing water for Australia: the social and institutional challenges. CSIRO, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  26. Ingram H (2008) Beyond universal remedies for good water governance: a political and contextual approach. In: Sixth Biennial Rosenberg Water Policy Forum on “Water for Food: Quantity and Quality in a Changing World”. Zaragoza, SpainGoogle Scholar
  27. Ison RL (2002) Some reflections on a knowledge transfer strategy: a systemic inquiry. In: Farming and rural systems research and extension, Proceedings Fifth IFSA European Symposium, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  28. Ison RL (2008a) Reprising “wicked problems”: social learning, climate change adaptation and the sustainable management of water. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ANZSYS (Australia NZ Systems Society) Conference, 1–3 December, PerthGoogle Scholar
  29. Ison RL (2008b) Systems thinking and practice for action research. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) The Sage handbook of action research participative inquiry and practice, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London, pp 139–158Google Scholar
  30. Ison RL (2008c) Methodological challenges of trans-disciplinary research: some systemic reflections. Nat Sci Soc 16:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ison RL (2010) Systems practice: how to act in a climate change world. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ison RL, Russell D (2007) Agricultural extension and rural development: breaking out of knowledge transfer traditions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Ison RL, Russell DB (2011) The worlds we create: designing learning systems for the underworld of extension practice. In: Jennings J, Packham RP, Woodside D (eds) Shaping change: natural resource management, agriculture and the role of extension. Australasia-Pacific Extension Network (APEN), Australia, pp. 66–76Google Scholar
  34. Ison RL, Watson D (2007) Illuminating the possibilities for social learning in the management of Scotland’s water. Ecol Soc 12:21Google Scholar
  35. Ison RL, Steyaert P, Roggero PP, Hubert B, Jiggins J (eds) (2004) The SLIM (Social learning for the integrated management and sustainable use of water at catchment scale) Final Report, SLIM August 2004. http://slim.open.ac.uk. Accessed 18 April 2011
  36. Ison RL, Röling N, Watson D (2007a) Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environ Sci Policy 10:499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ison RL, Bawden RD, Mackenzie B, Packham RG, Sriskandarajah N, Armson R (2007b) From sustainable to systemic development: an inquiry into transformations in discourse and praxis. In: Australia New Zealand Systems Conference 2007, “Systemic development: local solutions in a global environment” 2–5 December 2007, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  38. Kersten S, Ison RL (1998) Listening, interpretative cycles and dialogue: process design for collaborative research and development. J Agric Educ Ext 5:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. RELU (Rural Economy and Land Use Programme) (2007) Common knowledge? An exploration of knowledge transfer. RELU Briefing Series No 6. Newcastle-upon Tyne. 12ppGoogle Scholar
  40. Lynch AH, Tryhorn L, Abramson R (2008) Working at the boundary: facilitating interdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 89:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maturana H (2007) Systemic versus genetic determination. Constructivist Foundations 3:21–26Google Scholar
  42. Maturana H, Poerkson B (2004) From being to doing. The origins of the biology of cognition. Carl-Auer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  43. McClintock D, Ison RL, Armson R (2003) Metaphors of research and researching with people. J Environ Plan Manag 46:715–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McClintock D, Ison RL, Armson R (2004) Conceptual metaphors: a review with implications for human understandings and systems practice. Cybern Hum Knowing 11:25–47Google Scholar
  45. NESTA ICC/19 / Published: January 2008 Policy briefing. Innovation against climate change. 4ppGoogle Scholar
  46. Nowotny H (2003) Dilemma of expertise. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci Publ Policy 30:151–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Næss LO (2006) Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio 35:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L (2007) Enhancing the fit through adaptive comanagement: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve Sweden. Ecol Soc 12:28Google Scholar
  49. Open University (2006) Techniques for Environmental Decision Making. The Open University (UK), Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  50. Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:641–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Requirements for adaptive water management. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Moltgen J (eds) Adaptive and integrated water management: coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  52. Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Moltgen J (eds) (2007a) Adaptive and integrated water management: coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  53. Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007b) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12:5Google Scholar
  54. Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tabara D (2008) The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecol Soc 13:24–27Google Scholar
  55. Perrings C, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A, Mooney H (2011) The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Sciencexpress, 17 February 1/10–3/10Google Scholar
  56. Pohl C, van Kerhoff L, Bammer G, Hirsch Hadorn G (2008) Integration. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (eds) Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pollard SR, Biggs H, Toit DD, Cousins T (2008) Seeing the linkages: The importance of a systems view in understanding the dynamics of community-based and statutory water resources governance within the Sand River Catchment, Bushbuckridge, South Africa. In: Dynamics of Institutions in Water Resource Management January 9–11, 2008, Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  58. Rip A (2006) A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance—and its ironies. In: Voss JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 82–100Google Scholar
  59. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science 4:155–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Röling N, Wagemakers A (eds) (1998) Facilitating sustainable agriculture. Participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Russell DB, Ison RL (2007) The research-development relationship in rural communities: an opportunity for contextual science. In: Ison RL, Russell DB (eds) Agricultural extension and rural development: breaking out of knowledge transfer traditions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 10–31Google Scholar
  62. Schenkel R (2010) The challenge of feeding scientific advice into policy-making. Science 330:1749–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schön DA (1984) The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Schön DA, Rein M (1994) Frame reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. SLIM (2004a) Developing conducive and enabling institutions for concerted action, SLIM Policy Briefing No. 3. Social learning for the integrated management and sustainable use of water at catchment scale. http://slim.open.ac.uk. Accessed 18 April 2011
  66. SLIM (2004b) The role of conducive policies in fostering social learning for integrated management of water, SLIM Policy Briefing No. 5. Social learning for the integrated management and sustainable use of water at catchment scale. http://slim.open.ac.uk. Accessed 18 April 2011
  67. SLIM (2004c) Facilitation in Policy Processes: Developing New Professional Skills. SLIM Policy Briefing No. 4. Social learning for the integrated management and sustainable use of water at catchment scale. http://slim.open.ac.uk. Accessed 18 April 2011
  68. SLIM (2004d) SLIM framework: social learning as a policy approach for sustainable use of water. http://slim.open.ac.uk. Accessed 18 April 2011
  69. Steyaert P, Jiggins J (2007) Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environ Sci Policy 10:575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Steyaert P, Barzman MS, Brives H, Ollivier G, Billaud JP, Hubert B (2007) The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands. Environ Sci Policy 10:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tippett J, Searle B, Pahl-Wostl C, Rees Y (2005) Social learning in public participation in river basin management—early findings from HarmoniCOP European case studies. Environ Sci Policy 8:287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Toderi M, Powell N, Seddaiu G, Roggero PP, Gibbon D (2007) Combining social learning with agro-ecological research practice for more effective management of nitrate pollution. Environ Sci Policy 10:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Torbert WR, Associates (2004) Action inquiry: the secret of timely and transforming leadership. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  74. Turton A (2008): A clean South Africa. Prepared for the CSIR Conference “Science Real and Relevant” 18 November 2008, Pretoria. CSIR Report No. CSIR/NRE/WR/EXP/2008/0160/AGoogle Scholar
  75. UNCCD (2010) Ecological restoration in Italy. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. http://unddd.unccd.int/europe-launch.htm. Accessed 18 April 2011
  76. van Kerkhoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 8:452–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wallis P, Ison RL (2011) Appreciating institutional complexity in water governance dynamics: a case from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, Water Resources Management (This Issue)Google Scholar
  78. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  79. Young OR, Berkhout F, Gallopin GC, Janssen MA, Ostrom E, van der Leeuw S (2006) The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Glob Environ Chang 16:304–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Ison
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kevin Collins
    • 3
  • John Colvin
    • 3
  • Janice Jiggins
    • 4
  • Pier Paolo Roggero
    • 5
  • Giovanna Seddaiu
    • 5
  • Patrick Steyaert
    • 6
  • Marco Toderi
    • 7
  • Chiara Zanolla
    • 8
  1. 1.School of Geography and Environmental ScienceMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Communication & Systems DepartmentThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  3. 3.Open Systems Research Group, Communication & Systems DepartmentThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  4. 4.Communication & Innovation Studies GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche e Genetica Vegetale Agraria and NRD Desertification Research GroupUniversity of SassariSassariItaly
  6. 6.INRA-SAD, UR SenSUniversité Paris-Est, Marne la ValléeChamps-sur MarneFrance
  7. 7.Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali e delle Produzioni VegetaliUNIVPM (Polytechnic University of Marche)AnconaItaly
  8. 8.NRD Desertification Research GroupUniversity of SassariSassariItaly

Personalised recommendations