Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trusting Emergence: Some Experiences of Learning about Integrated Catchment Science with the Environment Agency of England and Wales

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The changing context of managing water in the European Union poses a fundamental and largely unaddressed question: are current scientific practices and scientific explanations able to meet the demands of doing effective integrated catchment management? This paper presents findings from 2 years of co-researching with scientists responsible for developing the Integrated Catchment Science Strategy within the Environment Agency, the main environmental regulatory body for England and Wales. The use of a co-researching approach using systems thinking and practice to enable social learning created, where none existed, a common conceptual framing of purpose and an incipient community of practice (CoP). Three key insights emerge: (1) integration of catchment sciences is possible at the level of policy objectives; (2) a shift in language and practice is required towards Integrated Catchment Managing to describe and enact the sets of purposeful activities and interactions among multiple stakeholders; (3) institutional and organizational constraints exist which limit the potential of CoPs to act in more innovative ways and develop more integrated and adaptive science-policy. Our findings confirm the need to develop learning processes which pay attention to the context, stakeholders, the key changes that are required in particular catchments and, most important of all, the epistemological perspective(s) of those involved in managing catchments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballweber JA (2006) A comparison of IWRM frameworks: the United States and South Africa. J Contemp Water Res Educ 135:74–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden R (2004) Sustainability as emergence: the need for engaged discourse. In: Corcoran PB, Wals AEJ (eds) Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: problematics, promise, and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK (2004) Integrated water resources management: a re-assessment. Water Int 29:248–256. doi:10.1080/02508060408691775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore CP (2007) What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?—a theoretical overview. Environ Sci Policy 10:512–525. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore CP, Ison RL, Jiggins J (2007) Social learning: an alternative policy instrument for managing in the context of Europe’s water. Environ Sci Policy 10:493–498. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock K, Carter C (2007) Operationalising sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects. Geogr J 173:343–357. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00258.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton I, van Aalst M (2004) Look before you leap: a risk management approach for incorporating climate change adaptation in World Bank operations. The World Bank working paper 30065, 57 pp

  • Cameron JI (1997) Applying socio-ecological economics: a case study of contingent valuation and integrated catchment management. Ecol Econ 23:155–165. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00051-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of European Communities) (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Commun L327(43):1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2007) Towards sustainable water management in the European Union—first stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC. CEC, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2009) Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action. Climate Change and Water, Coasts and Marine Issues Commission staff working document accompanying the White paper. CEC, Brussels, SEC(2009) 386/2. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SEC:2009:0386:FIN:EN:PDF

  • Checkland PB (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action. A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB, Scholes J (1999) Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins K, Ison RL, Blackmore CP (2005) River basin planning project: social learning (phase 1). Environment Agency, Bristol (see www.environment-agency.gov.uk)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins K, Blackmore C, Morris D, Watson D (2007) A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: some findings from three UK case studies. Environ Sci Policy 10:564–574. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conacher A (2002) A role for geomorphology in integrated catchment management. Aust Geogr Stud 40:179–195. doi:10.1111/1467-8470.00173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corning PA (2002) The re-emergence of ‘emergence’: a venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity 7:18–30. doi:10.1002/cplx.10043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels S, Walker G (1996) Collaborative learning: improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environ Impact Asses Rev 16:71–102. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(96)00003-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs) (2002) Directing the flow: priorities for future water policy. DEFRA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (2008) Future water: the Government’s water strategy for England. Cm 7319. DEFRA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovers S (2005) Clarifying the imperative of integration research for sustainable environmental management. J Res Practice 1(2), Article M1. Accessed September 2007 from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/11/30

  • Edwards AC, Dennis P (2000) The landscape ecology of water catchments: integrated approaches to planning and management. Landsc Res 25:305–320. doi:10.1080/713684685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EA (Environment Agency) (2002) Making it happen: corporate strategy for 2002–2007. Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • EA (2004) Solving environmental problems using science. Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • EA (2006a) River basin planning strategy for England and Wales. Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • EA (2006b) Integrated catchment science strategy. Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairtlough G (2007) The three ways of getting things done: hierarchy, heterarchy and responsible autonomy in organizations, International Edn. Triarchy, Dorset

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger M, Verlaan P (1995) Learning our way out: a conceptual framework for social- environmental learning. World Dev 23:505–513. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(94)00128-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith J (1999) Emergence as a construct: history and issues. Emergence Complex Organ 1:49–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson D, Cicmil S (2006) Making projects critical: an introduction. In: Hodgson D, Cicmil S (eds) Making projects critical. Macmillan, Hampshire, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Stowell F (2004) Systems practice for managing complexity networks—final report to EPSRC. EPSRC, Swindon

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Röling N, Watson D (2007a) Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environ Sci Policy 10:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Blackmore CP, Collins K, Furniss P (2007b) Systemic environmental decision making: designing learning systems. Kybernetes 36:1340–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lach D, Rayner S, Ingram H (2005) Taming the waters: strategies to domesticate the wicked problems of water resource management. Int J Water 3:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz-Sisitka H, Burt J (2006) A critical review of participatory practice in integrated water resource management. Environmental Education and Sustainability Unit, Rhodes University, Grahamstown

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch AH, Tryhorn L, Abramson R (2008) Working at the boundary: facilitating interdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89:69–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod CJA, Scholefield D, Haygarth PM (2007) Integration for sustainable catchment management. Sci Total Environ 373:591–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margerum RD (1997) Integrated approaches to environmental planning and management. J Plan Lit 11:459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema W, Jeffrey P (2005) IWRM and adaptive management: synergy or conflict? NeWater report series no. 7. pp 1–43. Available at: www.usf.uni-osnabrueck.de/projects/newater/downloads/newater_rs07.pdf

  • Nocker M (2006) The contested object: on projects as emergent space. In: Hodgson D, Cicmil S (eds) Making projects critical. Macmillan, Hampshire, pp 132–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson JA, Andersson L (2007) Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management. Water Resour Manag 21:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Open University (2002) Study pack T552 systems thinking and practice: diagramming. Open University, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Requirements for adaptive water management. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Moltgen J (eds) Adaptive and integrated water management: coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Moltgen J (eds) (2007a) Adaptive and integrated water management: coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007b) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):5. Available at www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol12/iss2/art5/

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard S (2002) Operationalising the new Water Act: contributions from the Save the Sand Project—an integrated catchment management initiative. Phys Chem Earth 27:941–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (2001) Handbook of action research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve I, Marshall G, Musgrave W (2002) Agriculture and natural resource management in the Murray–Darling Basin: a policy history and analysis. Resource Governance and Integrated Catchment Management: Issues Paper No 2, Murray–Darling Basin Commission Project MP2004. Institute for Rural Futures, University of New England, Armidale

    Google Scholar 

  • SLIM (2004a) Ecological constraints in sustainable management of natural resources. SLIM policy briefing no. 1. SLIM. Available at http://slim.open.ac.uk

  • SLIM (2004b) SLIM framework: social learning as a policy approach for sustainable use of water. SLIM. Available at http://slim.open.ac.uk

  • SLIM (2004c) Introduction to SLIM publications for policy makers and practitioners, introductory policy briefing. SLIM. Available at http://slim.open.ac.uk

  • SLIM (2004d) The role of conducive policies in fostering social learning for integrated management of water. SLIM policy briefing no. 5. SLIM. Available at http://slim.open.ac.uk

  • SLIM (2004e) Developing conducive and enabling institutions for concerted action. SLIM policy briefing no. 3. SLIM. Available at http://slim.open.ac.uk

  • Stevens CJ, Fraser I, Mitchley J, Thomas MB (2007) Making ecological science policy-relevant: issues of scale and disciplinary integration. Landsc Ecol 22:799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert P, Jiggins J (2007) Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environ Sci Policy 10:575–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tàbara JD, Ilhan A (2008) Culture as trigger for sustainability transition in the water domain. The case of the Spanish water policy and the Ebro river basin. Reg Environ Change 8:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2008) Introduction to integrated water resource management: UN Water Virtual Learning Course. Available at: http://ocw.unu.edu/international-network-on-water-environment-and-health/introduction-to-iwrm/introduction/

  • Watson N, Walker G, Medd W (2007) Critical perspectives on integrated water management. Geogr J 173:297–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheater HS, Peach D (2004) Developing interdisciplinary science for integrated catchment management: the UK lowland catchment research (LOCAR) programme. Water Resour Dev 20:369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhill J, Röling N (1998) The second wing of the eagle: the human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures. In: Röling N, Wagemakers MAE (eds) Facilitating sustainable agriculture: participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 46–71

    Google Scholar 

  • World Water Forum (2000) Ministerial declaration of The Hague on water security in the 21st Century. La Hague, The Netherlands. Available at: http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/wwc/Library/Official_Declarations/The_Hague_Declaration.pdf

  • World Water Forum (2003) Ministerial declaration—message from the Lake Biwa and Yodo River Basin. Kyoto, Japan. Available at: http://210.169.251.146/html/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Open Systems Research Group, Communications and Systems Department, Faculty of Maths, Computing and Technology, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK

    Kevin B. Collins & Ray L. Ison

Authors
  1. Kevin B. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ray L. Ison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin B. Collins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, K.B., Ison, R.L. Trusting Emergence: Some Experiences of Learning about Integrated Catchment Science with the Environment Agency of England and Wales. Water Resour Manage 24, 669–688 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9464-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9464-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation