Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of bryophytes and grass litter on seedling emergence vary by vertical seed position and seed size

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Establishment of plants through seeds is often constrained by the quality of microsites, which is in part controlled by the nature and amount of ground cover. The latter consists of living shoots of vascular plants or bryophytes and/or the dead remains of the dominant species. In the present article, we report the results of a controlled pot experiment with five species characteristic of floodplain grasslands. We manipulated the amounts of grass litter and/or mosses to study (1) differences between ground cover types with respect to their effects on microenvironment and seedling emergence and (2) how these effects interact with seed size and seed sowing position. Increasing amounts of both cover types led to increasing soil humidity, whereas temperature amplitude and illumination were decreased. However, since grass litter decomposed much faster than bryophytes, light conditions for germination under grass litter improved considerably with time. Although seedling emergence varied significantly between species, ground cover types and cover amounts, seed position alone explained about 50% of the variation in the data set. Additionally, we found an important interaction between seed size, seed position and cover type: large-seeded species showed a fitness advantage when seeds were situated beneath a cover, irrespective of cover type, which disappeared when seeds were shed on top of a cover layer. We suggest that this interaction may be ecologically and evolutionarily relevant because it may lead to changes in species composition and diversity of plant communities as a consequence of changes in the amount and type of ground cover.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Mufti MM, Sydes CL, Furness SB, Grime JP, Band SR (1977) A quantitative analysis of shoot phenology and dominance in herbaceous vegetation. J Ecol 65:759–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amatangelo KL, Dukes JS, Field CB (2008) Responses of a California annual grassland to litter manipulation. J Veg Sci 19:605–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin CC, Baskin JM (2001) Seeds—ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Grandin U, Kalamees R, Milberg P, Poschlod P, Thompson K, Willems JH (1998) Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: indicators of seed longevity. Funct Ecol 12:834–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosy JL, Reader RJ (1995) Mechanisms underlying the suppression of forb seedling emergence by grass (Poa pratensis) Litter. Funct Ecol 9:635–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun HH, Ten Brink DJ (2008) Recruitment advantage of large seeds is greater in shaded habitats. Ecoscience 15:498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BD, Grime JP, Mackey JML (1992) Shoot thrust and its role in plant competition. J Ecol 80:633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson WP, Peterson CJ (1990) The role of litter in an old-field community: impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance. Oecologia 85:8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC (2000) Seed movements and seedling fates in disturbed sagebrush steppe ecosystems: implications for restoration. Ecol Appl 10:1400–1413

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC, MacMahon JA, Haefner JH (1991) Seed entrapment in alpine ecosystems: effects of soil particle size and diaspore morphology. Ecology 72:1668–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donath TW, Eckstein RL (2008) Grass and oak litter exert different effects on seedling emergence of herbaceous perennials from grasslands and woodlands. J Ecol 96:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donath TW, Hölzel N, Otte A (2003) The impact of site conditions and seed dispersal on restoration success in alluvial meadows. Appl Veg Sci 6:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donath TW, Hölzel N, Bissels S, Otte A (2004) Perspectives for incorporating biomass from non-intensively managed temperate flood-meadows into farming systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donath TW, Hölzel N, Otte A (2006) Influence of competition by sown grass, disturbance and litter on recruitment of rare flood-meadow species. Biol Conserv 130:315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • During HJ, Van Tooren BF (1990) Bryophyte interactions with other plants. Bot J Linn Soc 104:79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein RL (2005) Differential effects of interspecific interactions and water availability on survival, growth and fecundity of three congeneric grassland herbs. New Phytol 166:525–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein RL, Donath TW (2005) Interactions between litter and water availability affect seedling emergence in four familial pairs of floodplain species. J Ecol 93:807–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein RL, Danihelka J, Hölzel N, Otte A (2004) The effects of management and environmental variation on population stage structure in three river-corridor violets. Acta Oecol 25:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ejrnæs R, Bruun HH, Graae BJ (2006) Community assembly in experimental grasslands: suitable environment or timely arrival? Ecology 87:1225–1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Equihua M, Usher MB (1993) Impact of carpets of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on Calluna vulgaris regeneration. J Ecol 81:359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (1992) Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecologia 91:360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facelli JM (1994) Multiple indirect effects of plant litter affect the establishment of woody seedlings in old fields. Ecology 75:1727–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facelli JM, Facelli E (1993) Interactions after death: plant litter controls priority effects in a successional plant community. Oecologia 95:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991a) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot Rev 57:2–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991b) Plant litter: light interception and effects on an old-field plant community. Ecology 72:1024–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle A, Violle C, Navas M-L (2009) Differential impacts of plant interactions on herbaceous species recruitment: disentangling factors controlling emergence, survival and growth of seedlings. Oecologia 159:817–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner M, Thompson K (2005) The ecology of seeds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Gross KL (1997) Partitioning the effects of plant biomass and litter on Andropogon gerardi in old-field vegetation. Ecology 78:2091–2104

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler NL (1986) Microsite requirements for germination and establishment of three grass species. Am Midl Nat 115:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (2002) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Lee JM (1987) Effect of soil surface topography and litter cover on the germination, survival, and growth of musk thistle (Carduus nutans). Am J Bot 74:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Read AF, Nee S (1995) Further remarks on the role of phylogeny in comparative ecology. J Ecol 83:733–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölzel N, Otte A (2004) Ecological significance of germination characteristics in flood-meadow species. Flora 199:12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovstad KA, Ohlson M (2008) Physical and chemical effects of litter on plant establishment in semi-natural grasslands. Plant Ecol 196:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Gutekunst K (2003) Effects of litter on establishment of grassland plant species: the role of seed size and successional status. Basic Appl Ecol 4:579–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurado E, Westoby M (1992) Seedling growth in relation to seed size among species of arid Australia. J Ecol 80:407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klanderud K, Totland O (2007) The relative role of dispersal and local interactions for alpine plant community diversity under simulated climate warming. Oikos 116:1279–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostel-Hughes F, Young TP, Wehr JD (2005) Effects of leaf litter depth on the emergence and seedling growth of deciduous forest tree species in relation to seed size. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotorová I, Lepš J (1999) Comparative ecology of seedling recruitment in an oligotrophic wet meadow. J Veg Sci 10:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd B, Facelli JM (2008) Priority effects produced by plant litter result in non-additive competitive effects. Oecologia 157:687–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leishman MR, Wright IJ, Moles AT, Westoby M (2000) The evolutionary ecology of seed size. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds—the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 31–57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Callaway RM (2004) Rethinking plant community theory. Oikos 107:433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallik AU, Hobbs RJ, Legg CJ (1984) Seed dynamics in Calluna-Arctotaphylos heath in north-eastern Scotland. J Ecol 72:855–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallik AU, Hobbs RJ, Rahman AA (1988) Seed-bed substrates and revegetation of Calluna heathlands following burning. J Environ Manage 27:379–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Milberg P, Andersson L, Thompson K (2000) Large-seeded species are less dependent on light for germination than small-seeded ones. Seed Sci Res 10:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moles AT, Westoby M (2004) Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. J Ecol 92:372–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münzbergová Z (2004) Effect of spatial scale on factors limiting species distributions in dry grassland fragments. J Ecol 92:854–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myster RW (1994) Contrasting litter effects on old field tree germination and emergence. Vegetatio 114:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M-C, Wardle DA, Dahlberg A (1999) Effects of plant litter species composition and diversity on the boreal forest plant–soil system. Oikos 86:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oostermeijer JGB, van’t Veer R, den Nijs JCM (1994) Population structure of the rare, long-lived perennial Gentiana pneumonanthe in relation to vegetation and management in the Netherlands. J Appl Ecol 31:428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader RJ (1993) Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species. J Ecol 81:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotundo JL, Aguiar MR (2005) Litter effects on plant regeneration in arid lands: a complex balance between seed retention, seed longevity and soil-seed contact. J Ecol 93:829–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruprecht E (2006) Successfully recovered grassland: a promising example from Romanian old-fields. Rest Ecol 14:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruprecht E, Donath TW, Otte A, Eckstein RL (2008) Chemical effects of dominant grass on seed germination of four familial pairs of dry grassland species. Seed Sci Res 18:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiede R, Donath TW, Otte A (2009) Seed bank development after the restoration of alluvial grassland via transfer of seed-containing plant material. Biol Conserv 142:404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiwa K, Kikuzawa K (1996) Importance of seed size for the establishment of seedlings of five deciduous broad-leaved tree species. Vegetatio 123:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpe MD, Orm JM, Barkes T, Rosentreter R (2006) Germination and seed water status of four grasses on moss-dominated biological soil crusts from arid lands. Plant Ecol 185:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton CM, Rogers KH (1991) The influence of pre-drying graminoid litter on the rate of mass-loss from litter bags. S Afr J Bot 57:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmering D, Waldhardt R, Otte A (2001) Syndynamik und Ökologie von Besenginsterbeständen des Lahn-Dill-Berglandes unter Berücksichtigung ihrer Genese aus verschiedenen Rasengesellschaften. Tuexenia 21:51–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Spacková I, Kotorová I, Lepš J (1998) Sensitivity of seedling recruitment to moss, litter and dominant removal in an oligotrophic wet meadow. Folia Geobot 33:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft (2002) STATISTICA 6.0 for windows. Statsoft, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe JR, Schmitt J (2006) Ecosystem engineers as selective agents: the effects of leaf litter on emergence time and early growth in Impatiens capensis. Ecol Lett 9:258–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sydes C, Grime JP (1981) Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland. I. Field investigations. J Ecol 69:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Grime JP (1983) A comparative study of germination responses to diurnally-fluctuating temperatures. J Appl Ecol 20:141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Cleve K, Dyrness CT, Viereck LA, Fox J, Chapin FS, Oechel W (1983) Taiga ecosystems in interior Alaska. Bioscience 33:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tooren BF (1990) Effects of a bryophyte layer on the emergence of seedlings of chalk grassland species. Acta Oecol 11:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, Keddy PA (1999) Assembly rules as general constraints on community composition. In: Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) Ecological assembly rules. Perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 251–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Jurado E, Leishman M (1992) Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. Trends Ecol Evol 7:368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Leishman MR, Lord JM (1995) On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction. J Ecol 83:531–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Leishman M, Lord J (1996) Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 351:1309–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisskirchen R, Haeupler H (1998) Standardliste der Farn und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong S, Nilsson C (1999) The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 87:984–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Christiane Lenz-Kuhl and Josef Scholz-vom Hofe for their support during the experiment and in the laboratory and Sandra Burmeier for seed collection. Sandra Burmeier, Annette Otte, Eszter Ruprecht and two anonymous referees offered helpful comments that significantly improved the manuscript. All help is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resource Management, Interdisciplinary Research Centre, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26–32, 35392, Gießen, Germany

    Tobias W. Donath & R. Lutz Eckstein

Authors
  1. Tobias W. Donath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Lutz Eckstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias W. Donath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donath, T.W., Eckstein, R.L. Effects of bryophytes and grass litter on seedling emergence vary by vertical seed position and seed size. Plant Ecol 207, 257–268 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9670-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9670-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation