Skip to main content
Log in

The role of litter in an old-field community: impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We studied the effect of removing and adding plant litter in different seasons on biomass, density, and species richness in a Solidago dominated old-field community in New Jersey, USA. We removed all the naturally accumulated plant litter in November (658 g/m2) and in May (856 g/m2) and doubled the amount of litter in November and May in replicated plots (1 m2). An equal number of plots were left as controls. Litter removal and addition had little impact on total plant biomass or individual species biomass in the growing season following the manipulations. Litter removal, however, significantly increased plant densities but this varied depending upon the season of litter removal, species, and life history type. Specifically, the fall litter removal had a much greater impact than the spring litter removal suggesting that litter has its greatest impact after plant senescence in the fall and prior to major periods of early plant growth in spring. Annual species showed the greatest response, especially early in the growing season. Both spring and fall litter removal significantly increased species richness throughout the study. Litter additions in both spring and fall reduced both plant densities and species richness in June, but these differences disappeared near the end of the growing season in September. We concluded than in productive communities where litter accumulation may be substantial, litter may promote low species richness and plant density. This explanation does not invoke resource competition for the decline in species richness. Finally, we hypothesize that there may be broad thresholds of litter accumulation in different community types that may act to either increase or decrease plant yield and diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbot DT, Crossley DA (1982) Wood litter decomposition following clear cutting. Ecology 63:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mufti MM, Sydes CL, Furness SB, Grime JP, Band SR (1977) A quantitative analysis of shoot phenology and dominance in herbaceous vegetation. J Ecol 65:759–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Armesto JJ, Pickett STA (1985) Experiments on disturbance in old-field plant communities: impact on species richness and abundance. Ecology 66:230–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett LI (1931) Influence of forest litter on the germination and early survival of Chestnut Oak, Quercus montana (Willd). Ecology 12:476–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakelaar RG, Odum EP (1978) Community and population level responses to fertilization in an old-field ecosystem. Ecology 59:660–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1977) Role of temperature in the germination ecology of three summer annual weeds. Oecologia 30:377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1988) Germination ecophysiology of herbaceous plant species in a temperate region. Am J Bot 75:286–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:351–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Mezga DM (1973) Primary productivity and microenvironment in an Ambrosia dominated old-field. Am Mid Nat 90:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty SW, Sholes ODV (1988) Leaf litter effect on plant species composition of deciduous forest treefall pits. Can J For Res 18:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson WP, Barrett GW (1988) Succession in old-field plant communities: effects of contrasting types of nutrient enrichment. Ecology 69:984–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson WP, Pickett STA (1990) Role of resources and disturbance in the organization of an old-field plant community. Ecology 71:226–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick GP, Quinn JH (1987) The role of seed depth, litter, and fire in the seedling establishment of amphicarpic peanutgrass (Amphicarpum purshii). Oecologia 73:459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyksterhuis EJ, Schmutz EM (1947) Natural mulches or litter of grasslands: with kinds and amounts on a southern prairie. Ecology 28:163–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Facelli JM, Carson WP (1990) Heterogeneity of litter accumulation in seral communities. Bull Torr Bot Club (in press)

  • Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1990) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Botanical Review

  • Fenner M (1985) Seed Ecology. Chapman and Hall Ltd. New York, New York, 150 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler NL (1986) Microsite requirements for germination and establishment of three grass species. Am Mid Nat 115:131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler NL (1988) What is a safe site? neighbor, litter, germination date, and patch effects. Ecology 69:947–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson DJ (1988) The maintainance of plant and soil heterogeneity in dune grassland. J Ecol 76:497–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1963) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Willard Grant Press, Boston, Mass. USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendenning GE (1942) Germination and emergence of some native grasses in relation to litter cover and soil moisture. J Am Soc Agron 34:797–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Werner PA (1983) The effect of size of opening in vegetation and litter cover on seedling establishment of goldenrods (Solidago spp.). Oecologia 60:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Son, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross KL (1984) Effect of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants. J Ecol 72:369–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross KL, Werner PA (1982) Colonizing abilities of biennial plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology 63:921–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Lee JM (1987) Effect of soil surface topography and litter cover on the germination, survival, and growth of musk thistle (Carduus nutans). Am J Bot 74:451–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady HF (1956) Changes in a central California annual plant community induced by manipulation of natural mulch. Ecology 37:798–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins HH (1954) Effects of mulch upon certain factors of the grassland environment. J Range Mgt 7:255–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulbert LC (1969) Fire and litter effects in undisturbed blue stem prairie. Ecology 50:874–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong TJ de, Klinkhamer PGL (1985) The negative effects of litter of parent plants of Cirsium vulgare on their offspring: autotoxicity or immobilization. Oecologia 65:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Scastedt TR (1986) Detritus accumulation limits productivity of tallgrass prairie. Bioscience 36:662–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivingston RB, Allesio ML (1986) Buried viable seeds in successional field and forest stands, Harvard Forest, Mass. Bull Tor Bot Club 95:58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinney AL (1929) Effects of forest litter on soil temperature and soil freezing in autumn and winter. Ecology 10:312–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk CD, Gabrielson FC (1985) Effects of shade, litter and root competition on old-field vegetation in South Carolina. Bull Tor Bot Club 112:383–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1960) Organic production and turnover in old field succession. Ecology 41:34–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Old SM (1969) Microclimate, fire and plant production in an Illinois prairie. Ecol Monogr 39:355–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosting HJ, Humphries ME (1940) Buried viable seeds in a successional series of old-field and forest soils. Bull Tor Bot Club 67:253–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfound WT (1964) Effects of denudation on the productivity of grassland. Ecology 45:838–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson DL, Bazzaz FA (1978) Life cycle characteristic of Aster pilosus in early successional habitats. Ecology 59:1005–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Baskin JM (1973) The role of temperature and light in the germination behavior of Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Bull Torr Bot Club 100:165–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice EL (1984) Allelopathy, Second Edition, Academic Press, NY USA

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1985) SAS Users Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt TR (1988) Mass, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in foliage and root detritus of tallgrass prairie. Ecology 69:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical Methods. Eighth Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal JR, Rohlf RR (1981) Biometry. Second Edition, WH Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Swieringa S, Wilson RE (1972) Phenodynamic analyses of two first-year old fields. Am J Bot 59:367–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydes C, Grime JP (1981a) Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland. I. Field investigations. J Ecol 69:237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydes C, Grime JP (1981b) Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland II. An experimental investigation. J Ecol 69:249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1983) Plant succession and gopher disturbances along an experimental gradient. Oecologia 60:285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1987) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol Monogr 57:189–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugolini FC (1964) Soil development on the red beds of New Jersey. W.L. Hutcheson Mem For Bull 2:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Valk AG van der (1986) The impact of litter and annual plants on recruitment from the seed bank of a lacustrine wetland. Aquat Bot 24:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P (1982) Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am Nat 119:553–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt AS (1971) Factors controlling the floristic composition of some plant communities in Breckland. In: Duffey E, Watt AS (eds), The scientific management of animal and plant communities for conservation, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England, pp 137–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt AS (1974) Senescence and rejuvination in ungrazed chalk grassland (grassland B) in Breckland: the significance of litter and of moles. J Appl Ecol 23:1157–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver JE, Roland NW (1952) Effects of excessive natural mulch on development, yield, and structure of native grassland. Bot Gaz 114:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigert RG, McGinnis JT (1975) Annual production and disappearance of detritus on three South Carolina old-fields. Ecology 56:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner PA (1975) The effects of plant litter on germination in teasel, Dipsacus sylvestris Huds. Am Mid Nat 94:470–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BD, Giller KE (1982) Species richness of herbaccous fen vegetation in Broadland, Norfolk in the relation to the quantity of above-ground plant material. J Ecol 70:179–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms WD, Smoliak S, Bailey AW (1986) Herbage production following litter removal on Alberta Native grasslands. J Range Mngt 39:536–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn AA (1985) Effects of seed size and microsite on seedling emergence of Prunella vulgaris in four habitats. J Ecol 73:931–840

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carson, W.P., Peterson, C.J. The role of litter in an old-field community: impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance. Oecologia 85, 8–13 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317337

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317337

Key words

Navigation