Epistemic authority of professors and researchers: differential perceptions by students from two cultural-educational systems
- 531 Downloads
Teachers and researchers are considered epistemic authorities that provide reliable information if that information is relevant to their discipline. Students differentiate between relevant and irrelevant disciplines when assessing teachers’ expertise. In this paper, it is investigated whether students’ cultural-educational background plays a role in this differentiation between relevant and irrelevant disciplines. In large power distance cultures such as France, students learn to respect and obey their teacher, whereas in smaller power distance cultures such as the Netherlands, the relationships between students and teachers are more informal. Therefore, French students may be less sensitive to the actual discipline when assessing a source’s expertise. In an experiment, it was empirically tested whether French students perceived smaller differences than Dutch students between fictitious professors and researchers who put forward information that was or was not related to their own discipline. Results showed that the French participants indeed differentiated to a much lesser degree between professors and researchers with a relevant and an irrelevant discipline than did the Dutch participants. Further analyses indicated that students’ obedience partially mediated this effect of nationality on the difference between relevant and irrelevant disciplines. This study underlines the role that cultural-educational background can play in the assessments of epistemic authorities.
KeywordsCulture Discipline Epistemic authority Obedience Power distance
The author wishes to thank Remieg Aerts, Thomas Beaufils, Michèle Bitour, Jacqueline de Bony, Hans Hoeken, Claudia Huisman, Frank van Meurs, Margot van Mulken, and Evelyne Vos-Fruit for their suggestions regarding this research.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Alexander R. (2000) Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
- Altemeyer B. (1988) Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Blom S. (1995) Intellectuele vorming in Nederland en Frankrijk: Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar deelname aan intellectuele vorming in het Franse en Nederlandse voortgezet onderwijs [Intellectual formation in the Netherlands and France: A comparative study of the participation in intellectual formation in Dutch and French secondary education]. Wolters-Noordhoff, GroningenGoogle Scholar
- Brislin R. W. (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: Triandis H. C., Berry J. W. (eds) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, pp 389–444Google Scholar
- Cairns, J., Lawton, D., Gardner, R. (eds) (2001) Values, culture and education. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
- De Bony, J. (2003). Individual autonomy and socialization at the Dutch elementary school: The relationship between the individual and the group. In W. Jochems et al. (Eds.), Grenzeloos leren: Proceedings van de 30e onderwijs research dagen 2003 (pp. 110–112). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.Google Scholar
- Fiske A. P., Kitayama S., Markus H. R., Nisbett R. E. (1998) The cultural matrix of social psychology. In: Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. (eds) The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed.). McGraw-Hill, Boston, pp 915–981Google Scholar
- Hofstede G. (2001) Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
- Kruglanski A. W. (1989) Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Lee W. O. (2001) Moral perspectives on values, culture and education. In: Cairns J., Lawton D., Gardner R. (eds) Values, culture and education. Kogan Page, London, pp 27–45Google Scholar
- Luchok J. A., McCroskey J. C. (1978) The effect of quality of evidence on attitude change and source credibility. The Southern Speech Communication Journal 43(4): 371–383Google Scholar
- Raviv A., Bar-Tal D., Raviv A., Houminer D. (1990a) Development in children’s perceptions of epistemic authorities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 8(2): 157–169Google Scholar
- Sobel M. E. (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models”. In: Leinhardt S. (ed.) Sociological methodology. American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, pp 290–312Google Scholar
- Van de Vijver F. J. R., Leung K. (1997) Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar