Advertisement

Catechizing the Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries

Abstract

This study stabs to probe the impact of financial development, urbanization, trade openness, political institutions, and energy consumption on the ecological footprints (EF), within the framework of EKC, of 110 countries congregated by income levels, over the time span of 1996–2016. The final outcome of cross-sectionally weighted Panel EGLS and multi-step A-B GMM evidently reinforced the existence of EKC hypothesis in case of EF both in developed and less-developed countries. This study finds the destructive environmental impact of composition effect and energy consumption while political institutions, trade openness, and urbanization have constructive environmental effect. Financial development reduces the human demand on nature only in less-developed countries. The ultimate consequences of this study are equipped with several policy recommendations for the concerned authorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1

Source: Developed by the author based upon data extracted from WDI, World Bank and Global Footprint Network

Fig. 2

Source: Developed by the author based upon data extracted from Global Footprint Network

Fig. 3

Source: Developed by the author based upon data extracted from WDI, World Bank and Global Footprint Network

Fig. 4

Source: Developed by the author based upon data extracted from Global Footprint Network

Fig. 5

Source: Developed by the author based upon data extracted from WDI, World Bank and Global Footprint Network

Fig. 6

Source: Developed by the author based upon data extracted from Global Footprint Network

Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Notes

  1. 1.

    Greenhouse gasses include CO2, N2O, S2O, CH4, and anthropogenic Fluorinated gasses.

  2. 2.

    Ecological deficit indicates that ecological footprints (natural resources consumption) exceeds the biocapacity (biologically productive area).

  3. 3.

    For definitions of scale, technique, and composition effects see Sect. 1.

  4. 4.

    https://www.footprintnetwork.org.

  5. 5.

    Accessed on 15th March, 2018.

  6. 6.

    Governments in less developed countries are compelled to borrow, for economic development, from depository corporations. So, credit by banking sector is a better measure of financial intermediation in less developed countries, than credit to private sector.

  7. 7.

    Liquid liabilities measures the debt obligations payable within a year. It measures the liabilities provision to the economy.

  8. 8.

    CIPS is cross-section augmented IPS Im et al. (2003) unit root test for heterogeneous panels by Pesaran (2007).

References

  1. Abler, D., & Shortle, J. (1998). Decomposing the effects of trade on the environment. In J. M. Antle, J. N. Lekakis, G. P. Zanias (Eds.), Agriculture, trade and the environment: the impact of liberalisation on sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  2. Adu, G., Marbuah, G., & Mensah, J. T. (2013). Financial development and economic growth in Ghana: Does the measure of financial development matter? Review of Development Finance,3, 192–203.

  3. Adusei, M. (2012). Financial development and economic growth: Is Schumpeter right. British Journal of Economics Management and Trade,2, 265–278.

  4. Ahmad, A., Zhao, Y., Shahbaz, M., Bano, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, S., et al. (2016). Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy. Energy Policy,96, 131–143.

  5. Akbostancı, E., Türüt-Aşık, S., & Tunç, G. (2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy,37, 861–867.

  6. Ali, R., Bakhsh, K., & Yasin, M. A. (2019a). Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economy: Evidence from Pakistan. Sustainable Cities and Society,48, 101553.

  7. Ali, H. S., Zeqiraj, V., Lin, W. L., Law, S. H., Yusop, Z., Bare, U. A. A., et al. (2019b). Does quality institutions promote environmental quality? Environmental Science and Pollution Research,10, 1–11.

  8. Allard, A., Takman, J., Uddin, G. S., & Ahmed, A. (2018). The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: An empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,25, 5848–5861.

  9. Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I., & Lean, H. H. (2015a). The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Natural Hazards,79, 621–644.

  10. Al-Mulali, U., & Sab, C. N. B. C. (2012). The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emission on the economic growth and financial development in the sub Saharan African countries. Energy,39, 180–186.

  11. Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015b). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators,48, 315–323.

  12. Alvarez-Herranz, A., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., & Cantos, J. M. (2017). Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy,105, 386–397.

  13. Ang, J. B. (2007). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy,35, 4772–4778.

  14. Ang, J. B. (2009). CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China. Ecological Economics,68, 2658–2665.

  15. Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1998) Is free trade good for the environment? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (U S), vol No 6707:1–[68], August 1998.

  16. Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review,91(4), 877–908.

  17. Apergis, N., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators,52, 16–22.

  18. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2009). CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy,37, 3282–3286.

  19. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies,58, 277–297.

  20. Arouri, M. E. H., Youssef, A. B., M’henni, H., & Rault, C. (2012). Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries. Energy Policy,45, 342–349.

  21. Aslan, A., Destek, M. A., & Okumus, I. (2018). Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: Evidence from the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,25, 2402–2408.

  22. Bagliani, M., Bravo, G., & Dalmazzone, S. (2008). A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecological Economics,65, 650–661.

  23. Balin, B. E., & Akan, D. M. (2015). EKC hypothesis and the effect of innovation: A panel data analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Finance,4, 81.

  24. Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: Wiley.

  25. Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., & Kao, C. (2012). A lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics,170, 164–177.

  26. Bello, M. O., Solarin, S. A., & Yen, Y. Y. (2018). The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: The role of hydropower in an emerging economy. Journal of Environmental Management,219, 218–230.

  27. Bhattarai, M., & Hammig, M. (2001). Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: A crosscountry analysis for Latin America. Africa and Asia World Development,29, 995–1010.

  28. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics,87, 115–143.

  29. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies,47, 239–253.

  30. Calderón, C., & Liu, L. (2003). The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics,72, 321–334.

  31. Caviglia-Harris, J. L., Chambers, D., & Kahn, J. R. (2009). Taking the “U” out of Kuznets: A comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics,68, 1149–1159.

  32. Chandran, V., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,24, 445–453.

  33. Chang, T. (2002). Financial development and economic growth in Mainland China: A note on testing demand-following or supply-leading hypothesis. Applied Economics Letters,9, 869–873.

  34. Charfeddine, L. (2017). The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: Evidence from a Markov switching equilibrium correction model. Energy Economics,65, 355–374.

  35. Charfeddine, L., & Kahia, M. (2019). Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable Energy,139, 198–213.

  36. Charfeddine, L., & Khediri, K. B. (2016). Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: Cointegration with structural breaks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,55, 1322–1335.

  37. Charfeddine, L., & Mrabet, Z. (2017). The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,76, 138–154.

  38. Chen, M.-H. (2010). The economy, tourism growth and corporate performance in the Taiwanese hotel industry. Tourism Management,31, 665–675.

  39. Chen, H., Jia, B., & Lau, S. (2008). Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: Challenges of a rapid urbanized economy. Habitat International,32, 28–40.

  40. Chiu, Y. B. (2012). Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve in developing countries: A panel smooth transition regression approach. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie,60, 177–194.

  41. Cole, M. A. (2006). Does trade liberalization increase national energy use? Economics Letters,92, 108–112.

  42. Coondoo, D., & Dinda, S. (2002). Causality between income and emission: A country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecological Economics,40, 351–367.

  43. Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature42(1):7–71

  44. Creane, S., Goyal, R., Mobarak, A. M., & Sab, R. (2006). Measuring financial development in the Middle East and North Africa: A new database IMF staff papers, pp. 479–511

  45. Cropper, M., & Griffiths, C. (1994). The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. The American Economic Review,84, 250–254.

  46. Culas, R. J. (2007). Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: An institutional perspective. Ecological Economics,61, 429–437.

  47. Dasgupta, S., Hettige, H., & Wheeler, D. (2000). What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,39, 39–66.

  48. De Bruyn, S. M., van den Bergh, J. C., & Opschoor, J. B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: Reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics,25, 161–175.

  49. De Gregorio, J., & Guidotti, P. E. (1995). Financial development and economic growth. World Development23, 433–448.

  50. Deacon, R. (2003). Dictatorship, democracy, and the provision of public goods. UC Santa Barbara: Department of Economics. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9h54w76c.

  51. Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics,49, 431–455.

  52. Dong, K., Sun, R., Li, H., & Liao, H. (2018). Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO2 emissions: Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,94, 419–429.

  53. Dong, F., Wang, Y., Su, B., Hua, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The process of peak CO2 emissions in developed economies: A perspective of industrialization and urbanization. Resources Conservation & Recycling,141, 61–75.

  54. Dutt, K. (2009). Governance, institutions and the environment-income relationship: a cross-country study. Environment Development and Sustainability,11, 705–723.

  55. Farhani, S., Chaibi, A., & Rault, C. (2014). CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Economic Modelling,38, 426–434.

  56. Feridun, M., & Sezgin, S. (2008). Regional underdevelopment and terrorism: The case of south eastern Turkey. Defence and Peace Economics,19, 225–233.

  57. Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review,89, 379–399.

  58. Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2002). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. National Bureau of Economic research working paper series (U S), vol No 9201:1-53, September 2002.

  59. Gill, A. R., Viswanathan, K. K., & Hassan, S. (2018). A test of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for carbon emission and potential of renewable energy to reduce green house gases (GHG) in Malaysia Environment. Development and Sustainability,20, 1103–1114.

  60. Gökmenoğlu, K., & Taspinar, N. (2016). The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: The case of Turkey. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development,25, 706–723.

  61. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  62. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1994). Economic growth and the environment. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  63. Halicioglu, F. (2009). An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy,37, 1156–1164.

  64. Hamit-Haggar, M. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Economics,34, 358–364.

  65. Hao, Y., & Liu, Y.-M. (2015). Has the development of FDI and foreign trade contributed to China’s CO2 emissions? An empirical study with provincial panel data. Natural Hazards,76, 1079–1091.

  66. Hassan, S. T., Xia, E., Khan, N. H., & Shah, S. M. A. (2019). Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,26, 2929–2938.

  67. He, J., & Richard, P. (2010). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecological Economics,69, 1083–1093.

  68. Hervieux, M.-S., & Darné, O. (2013). Environmental Kuznets Curve and ecological footprint: a time series analysis. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00781958.

  69. Hossain, M. S. (2011). Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy,39, 6991–6999.

  70. Ibrahim, M. H., & Law, S. H. (2015). Institutional quality and CO2 emission-trade relations: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa South African. Journal of Economics,84, 323.

  71. Ibrahim, M. H., & Law, S. H. (2016). Institutional quality and CO2 emission-trade relations: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa South African. Journal of Economics,84, 323–340.

  72. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics,115, 53–74.

  73. Jalil, A., & Feridun, M. (2011). The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics,33, 284–291.

  74. Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy,37, 5167–5172.

  75. Jayanthakumaran, K., & Liu, Y. (2012). Openness and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling,29, 566–576.

  76. Jenkıns, H. P., & Katırcıoglu, S. T. (2010). The bounds test approach for cointegration and causality between financial development, international trade and economic growth: The case of Cyprus. Applied Economics,42, 1699–1707.

  77. Jones, L. E., & Manuelli, R. E. (2001). Endogenous policy choice: The case of pollution and growth. Review of Economic Dynamics,4, 369–405.

  78. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika,39, 31–36.

  79. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics,90, 1–44.

  80. Kasman, A., & Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Economic Modelling,44, 97–103.

  81. Katircioglu, S. (2009). Tourism, trade and growth: The case of Cyprus. Applied Economics,41, 2741–2750.

  82. Katircioglu, S. (2010). Trade and growth in a non-recognized small island state: Evidence from the Turkish republic of Northern Cyprus. Journal of Business Economics and Management,11, 112–130.

  83. Katircioglu, S., Fethi, S., & Aga, M. (2010). Trade and growth: New empirical evidence from Hong Kong. Argumenta Oeconomica,25, 67–77.

  84. Katırcıoğlu, S., Fethi, S., Kalmaz, D. B., & Çağlar, D. (2016). Interactions between energy consumption, international trade, and real income in Canada: An empirical investigation from a new version of the Solow growth model. International Journal of Green Energy,13, 1059–1074.

  85. Katircioglu, S., Katircioglu, S., & Kilinc, C. C. (2018). Investigating the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from the globe. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 15029–15035.

  86. Katircioğlu, S. T., & Taşpinar, N. (2017). Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,68, 572–586.

  87. Kaushal, L. A., & Pathak, N. (2015). The causal relationship among economic growth, financial development and trade openess in Indian economy. International Journal of Economic Perspectives,9, 5.

  88. Kearsley, A., & Riddel, M. (2010). A further inquiry into the pollution haven hypothesis and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics,69, 905–919.

  89. King, R. G., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,108, 717–737.

  90. Lean, H. H., & Smyth, R. (2010). CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Applied Energy,87, 1858–1864.

  91. Leitao, A. (2010). Corruption and the environmental Kuznets curve: Empirical evidence for sulfur. Ecological Economics,69, 2191–2201.

  92. Levin, A., & Lin, C.-F. (2002). Chu C-SJ. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics,108, 1–24.

  93. Lise, W., & Van Montfort, K. (2007). Energy consumption and GDP in Turkey: Is there a co-integration relationship? Energy Economics,29, 1166–1178.

  94. López, R., Galinato, G., & Islam, A. (2007). Government Expenditures and Air Pollution University of Maryland at College Park working paper an empirical analysis of the relationship between the share of government expenditures in public goods and air pollution

  95. Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,61, 631–652.

  96. Marrero, G. A. (2010). Greenhouse gases emissions, growth and the energy mix in Europe. Energy Economics,32, 1356–1363.

  97. Mazur, E. A., & Alexander, W. R. J. (2001). Financial sector development and economic growth in New Zealand. Applied Economics Letters,8, 545–549.

  98. Mrabet, Z., & Alsamara, M. (2017). Testing the Kuznets curve hypothesis for Qatar: A comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,70, 1366–1375.

  99. Muhammad, J., & Ghulam Fatima, S. (2013). Energy consumption, financial development and CO2 emissions in Pakistan MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:48287.

  100. Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy,38, 661–666.

  101. Nazlioglu, S., Yalama, A., & Aslan, M. (2009). Financial development and investment: Cointegration and causality analysis for the case of Turkey International. Journal of Economic Perspectives,3, 107–119.

  102. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives,5, 97–112.

  103. Olale, E., Ochuodho, T. O., Lantz, V., & El Armali, J. (2018). The environmental Kuznets curve model for greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production,184, 859–868.

  104. Omri, A., & Chaibi, A. (2014). Nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth in developed and developing countries: A modelling analysis from simultaneous-equation models. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,42, 1012–1022.

  105. Omri, A., Daly, S., Rault, C., & Chaibi, A. (2015). Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: What causes what in MENA countries. Energy Economics,48, 242–252.

  106. Osabuohien, E. S., Efobi, U. R., & Gitau, C. M. W. (2014). Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve in Africa: Evidence from panel cointegration. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning,16, 517–538.

  107. Ozcan, B. (2013). The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy,62, 1138–1147.

  108. Ozturk, I., & Acaravci., A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,14, 3220–3225.

  109. Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2013). The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics,36, 262–267.

  110. Ozturk, I., Al-Mulali, U., & Saboori., B. (2016). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,23, 1916–1928.

  111. Panayotou, T. (1996). An inquiry into population, resources, and environment. The Impact of Population Growth on Well-being in Developing Countries,6, 259–298.

  112. Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: Turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics,2, 465–484.

  113. Pao, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-M. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy,38, 7850–7860.

  114. Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production,187, 770–779.

  115. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=572504.

  116. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics,22, 265–312.

  117. Poumanyvong, P., & Kaneko, S. (2010). Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecological Economics,70, 434–444.

  118. Rasoulinezhad, E., & Saboori, B. (2018). Panel estimation for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, CO2 emissions, the composite trade intensity, and financial openness of the commonwealth of independent states. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,25, 1–17.

  119. Rees, W. E. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization,4, 121–130.

  120. Rees, W., & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,16, 223–248.

  121. Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal,9, 86.

  122. Saboori, B., & Sulaiman, J. (2013a). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: A cointegration approach. Energy,55, 813–822.

  123. Saboori, B., & Sulaiman, J. (2013b). Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: Evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy,60, 892–905.

  124. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2012). Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy,51, 184–191.

  125. Sadorsky, P. (2010). The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy,38, 2528–2535.

  126. Saidi, K., & Mbarek, M. B. (2017). The impact of income, trade, urbanization, and financial development on CO2 emissions in 19 emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,24, 12748–12757.

  127. Seetanah, B., Sannassee, R. V., Fauzel, S., Soobaruth, Y., Giudici, G., & Nguyen, A. P. H. (2019). Impact of economic and financial development on environmental degradation: Evidence from small island developing states (SIDS). Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,55, 308–322.

  128. Seker, F., Ertugrul, H. M., & Cetin, M. (2015). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,52, 347–356.

  129. Shafik, N. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: An econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers,46, 757–773.

  130. Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time-series and cross-country evidence (Vol. 904). Washington: World Bank Publications.

  131. Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q. M. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leitão, N. C. (2013a). Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,25, 109–121.

  132. Shahbaz, M., & Lean, H. H. (2012). Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia. Energy Policy,40, 473–479.

  133. Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M., & Azim, P. (2013b). Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,18, 165–173.

  134. Shahbaz, M., Tiwari, A. K., & Nasir, M. (2013c). The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy,61, 1452–1459.

  135. Shahbaz, M., Van Hoang, T. H., Mahalik, M. K., & Roubaud, D. (2017). Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Economics,63, 199–212.

  136. Shahiduzzaman, M., & Alam, K. (2012). Cointegration and causal relationships between energy consumption and output: Assessing the evidence from Australia. Energy Economics,34, 2182–2188.

  137. Solarin, S. A., & Bello, M. O. (2018). Persistence of policy shocks to an environmental degradation index: The case of ecological footprint in 128 developed and developing countries. Ecological Indicators,89, 35–44.

  138. Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development,32, 1419–1439.

  139. Suri, V., & Chapman, D. (1998). Economic growth, trade and energy: Implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics,25, 195–208.

  140. Tamazian, A., & Rao, B. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics,32, 137–145.

  141. Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: A reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics,25, 147–160.

  142. Tyavambiza, T., & Nyangara, D. (2015). Financial and monetary reforms and the finance-growth relationship in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues,5, 590.

  143. Uddin, G. A., Alam, K., & Gow, J. (2016). Does ecological footprint impede economic growth? An empirical analysis based on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis Australian. Economic Papers,55, 301–316.

  144. Uddin, G. A., Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., & Gow, J. (2017). Ecological footprint and real income: Panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecological Indicators,77, 166–175.

  145. Ulucak, R., & Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production,188, 144–157.

  146. Ulucak, R., & Lin, D. (2017). Persistence of policy shocks to ecological footprint of the USA. Ecological Indicators,80, 337–343.

  147. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth (Vol. 9). New York: New Society Publishers.

  148. Wang, Y., Kang, L., Wu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2013). Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: A spatial econometric approach. Ecological Indicators,34, 15–21.

  149. Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Lu, A., Li, L., He, Y., ToJo, J., et al. (2017). A disaggregated analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for industrial CO2 emissions in China. Applied Energy,190, 172–180.

  150. Zhang, Y. J. (2011). The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: An empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy,39, 2197–2203.

  151. Zoundi, Z. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,72, 1067–1075.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Iftikhar Yasin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 10 and 11.

Table 10 Descriptive statistics of panel A (developed countries)
Table 11 Descriptive statistics of panel B (less-developed countries)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yasin, I., Ahmad, N. & Chaudhary, M.A. Catechizing the Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries. Soc Indic Res 147, 621–649 (2020) doi:10.1007/s11205-019-02163-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ecological footprints
  • Urbanization
  • Financial development
  • Political institutions
  • Environmental Kuznets curve
  • GMM