The Perceived Impact of Eight Systemic Factors on Scientific Capital Accumulation
In the global academic capitalist race, academics, institutions and countries’ symbolic power results from the accumulation of scientific capital. This paper relies on the perspectives of system actors located at the institutional, national and international levels to assess the perceived importance of eight systemic factors in contributing to the comparative advantage of social-democratic regimes, namely Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. A deductive thematic analysis performed on 56 transcripts and a one-way repeated-measure ANOVA (and pairwise post-hoc t-tests) performed on 324 questionnaires confirmed the hypotheses regarding the positive influence of academic traditions and internationalization. This study contributes to the development of a varieties of academic capitalism (VoAC) approach to apprehend how political-economies condition higher education systems’ (HES) comparative advantage.
KeywordsVarieties of academic capitalism Social-democratic regimes Nordic higher education systems Scientific capital Mixed-methods
Funding was provided by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant No. 756-2016-0184).
- Aarrevaara, Timo, and Elias Pekkola. 2010. A comparative perspective on the work content of the academic profession. In Higher Education in Finland, eds. Sakari Ahola and David M. Hoffman, 251–269. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
- Academy of Finland. 2014. Report: Finnish universities face strategic choices, should focus on their strengths and seize new initiatives. Helsinki: Academy of Finland. http://www.aka.fi/en. Accessed 26 Aug 2014.
- Aghion, Philippe, Mathias Dewatripont, Caroline M. Hoxby, Andreu Mas-Colell, and André Sapir. 2009. The governance and performance of research universities: Evidence from Europe and the U.S. NBER Working Paper No. 14851. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14851.pdf?new_window=1. Accessed 14 Apr 2014.
- Ahola, Sakari, Tina Hedmo, Jens-Peter Thomsen, and Agnete Vabø. 2014. Organizational features of higher education; Denmark, Finland, Norway & Sweden. NIFU Working Paper, 14/2014. http://www.nifu.no/en/publications/1162368. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.
- Arter, David. 2008. Scandinavian Politics Today. 2nd eds. New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- ARWU – Academic Ranking of World Universities. 2018. Academic Ranking of World Universities 2017. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2017.html. Accessed 27 June 2018.
- Askling, Berit. 2012. Integration and/or diversification: The role of structure in meeting expectations on higher education. HEIK Working Paper Series 2012/4. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
- Becker, Howard S., Blanche Geer, and Everett C. Hughes. 2003. Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. New Brunswick: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bégin-Caouette, Olivier. 2017. Small Mighty Centers in the Global Academic Capitalist Race: A Study of Systemic Factors Contributing to Scientific Capital Accumulation in Nordic Higher Education Systems. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brundenius, Claes, Bo Göransson, and Jan Ågren. 2011. The role of academic institutions in the national system of innovation and the debate in Sweden. In Universities in Transition: The Changing Role and Challenges for Academic Institutions, eds. Bo Göransson and Claes Brundenius, 307–325. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clark, Burton. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, Burton. 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- Creswell, John W., and Vicky Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd eds. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2010. Science and technology -report. Special Eurobarometer 340(73.1). Brussels: TNS Opinion & Social.Google Scholar
- Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Field, Andy. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. 2013. Kota-Tientokanta—Database. Retrieved from https://kotaplus.csc.fi/online/Haku.do. Accessed 15 July 2014.
- Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.Google Scholar
- Glimell, Hans. 2004. Restored scientific authority and orchestrated deliberation – A review of the current S&T policies. In Re-Purifying Scientific Authority: The Counter-Intuitive Case of Sweden – STS Research Report 7, ed. Hans Glimell, 5–14. Göteborg: Göteborg University.Google Scholar
- Gregersen, Brigitte, and Jorgen Gulddahl Rasmussen. 2011. Developing universities: The evolving role of academic institutions in Denmark. In Universities in Transition: The Changing Role and Challenges for Academic Institutions, eds. Bo Göransson and Claes Brundenius, 11–24. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Groves, Robert M., Floyd J. Fowler, Mick P. Couper, James M. Lepkowski, Eleanor Singer, and Roger Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2004. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hazelkorn, Ellen. 2013. World-class universities or world-class systems? Rankings and higher education policy choices. In Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses, eds. Mmantsetsa Marope, Peter J. Wells, and Ellen Hazelkorn, 71–94. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Holmes, Brian. 1981. Comparative Education: Some Considerations of Method. Boston: George Allen.Google Scholar
- ISI Web of Knowledge. 2013. ISI Web of Knowledge. http://www.webofscience.com. Accessed 10 Apr 2014.
- Kvil, Tove. 2004. The Norwegian quality reform. In Reforming Higher Education in the Nordic Countries—Studies of Change in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, eds. Ingemar Fägerling and Görel Strömqvist, 89–135. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) - UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Kyvik, Svein, Agnete Vabø and Aina Alvsvag. 2015. The formalization of research groups in higher education. Paper presented at the 2015 CHER Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Lepori, Benedetto, Emanuela Reale, and Stig Slipersaeter. 2011. The construction of new indicators for science and innovation policies: the case of project funding. In Science and Innovation Policy for the New Knowledge Economy, eds. Massimo G. Colombo, Luca Grilli, Lucia Piscitello, and Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 37–59. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Maassen, Peter, Agnete Vabø, and Bjørn Stensaker. 2008. Translation of globalisation and regionalisation in Nordic cooperation in higher education. In Borderless Knowledge: Understanding the “New” Internationalisation of Research and Higher Education in Norway, eds. A. Gornitzka and L. Langfeldt, 125–140. Oslo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Norden. 2014. Evaluation of two programmes using Nordic Centres of Excellence—The Programme on Food, Nutrition and Health and the Programme on Welfare Research. Oslo: NordForsk.Google Scholar
- Nordic Council of Ministers. 2016. Services and Goods Exports from the Nordics: Strongholds and profiles of exporting enterprises. https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1047303/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2018.
- OECD - Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. 2013. Main Science and Technology Indicators. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
- Öquist, Gunnar, and Mats Benner. 2015. Why Are Some Nations More Successful Than Others in Research Impact? A Comparison Between Denmark and Sweden. In Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations, eds. Isabell M. Welpe, Jutta Wollersheim, Stefanie Ringelhan, and Margit Osterloh, 241–257. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Riis, Ulla. 2012. Is the bar quivering? What can we learn about academic career requirements from the 1999 promotion reform? Pedagogisk Forskning I Uppsala 161: 1–42.Google Scholar
- Rosser, J. Barkeley, and Marina V. Rosser. 2018. Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy. 3rd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Royal Society. 2011. Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. London: Royal Policy.Google Scholar
- SCImago Journal & Country Rank. 2013. SJR—SCImago Country Rankings. http://www.scimagojr.com. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
- Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry Leslie. 1999. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- SNAHE – Swedish National Agency for Higher Education. 2012. Swedish Universities & Universities Colleges, Report 2012:18R. Stockholm: SNAHE.Google Scholar
- Välimaa, Jussi. 2005. Globalization in the concept of Nordic higher education. RIHE International Publication Series 9: 93–113.Google Scholar
- Virtanen, Turo, Charlotte Silander, and Maria Pietilä. 2014. National steering and profiling of academic research in Finland and Sweden. In Higher Education and Research in Academe: Who Should Pay?, eds. Timo Aarrevaara and Elisabeth Berg, 29–40. Lulea: Lulea University of Technology Graphic Production.Google Scholar