Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A constructivist redesigning of the learning space: the development of a sense of class cohesion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the importance of the pedagogical and physical design of new learning environments has grown. Around the world, innovative pedagogy has been implemented to address, among other things, the development of social skills. In this study, we examined an educational program that is an applied example of the constructivist approach whose goal is to develop collaborative skills and team work. The teaching and learning methods involved 143 class observations and 149 students’ questionnaire responses, and then the impact of the new learning environment on the development of a sense of social cohesion was investigated among 82 students. There was a statistically-significant advantage for sense of social cohesion among students of the innovative program compared with the traditional class. Students interpreted the collaborative learning and social mediation that teachers create as key factors in the development of classroom cohesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Students who were present when questionnaires were distributed and replied to such questionnaires.

References

  • Alansari, M., & Rubie-Davies, C. (2020). What about the tertiary climate? Reflecting on five decades of class climate research. Learning Environment Research, 23(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09288-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assessment and Teaching of 21 Century Skills - ATCS. (2012). 21st century skills. Retrieved May 12, 2020: http://www.atc21s.org/

  • Atkins, M. J. (1993). Theories of learning and multimedia applications: An overview. Research Papers in Education, 8(2), 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link. Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, 8(1), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, and E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

  • Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: a conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69, 479–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, J. G. (2009). The group effect: Social cohesion and health outcomes. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Prentice-Hall, Inc., One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458.

  • Deutsch M. (1968). Field theory in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y. J., & Sasson, I. (2008). Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: The value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 219–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z. S., Lorenz, J., Delhey, J., Boehnke, K., & Unzicker, K. (2016). Social cohesion in the western world: What holds societies together: Insights from the social cohesion radar. Springer.‏

  • Engel, L. C., Kington, A., & Mleczko, A. (2013). The influence of education on community cohesion: Adaptation of policy to practice. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(5), 408–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environment Research, 1, 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid, S. (2000). Constructivism and reflective practice in practice: Challenges and dilemmas of a mathematics teacher educator. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 2, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A., Preston, J., & Janmaat, J. (2006). Education, equality and social cohesion: A comparative analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawtrey, K. (2007). Using experiential learning techniques. Journal of Economic Education, 38(2), 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hug, T. (2010). Radical constructivism mainstreaming: A desirable endeavor? Critical considerations using examples from educational studies and learning theory. Constructivist Foundations, 6(1).‏

  • Huysken, K., Olivey, H., & McElmurry, K. (2019). Assessing collaborative, project -based learning models in introductory science courses. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(1), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. (1998). Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Family Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiraly, D. (2014). A social constructivist approach to translator education: Empowerment from theory to practice. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, E., DiCerbo, K., & Foltz, P. (2017). Skills for today: What we know about teaching and assessing collaboration. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M. K., McNaughton, S., Amituanai-Toloa, M., Turner, R., & Hsiao, S. (2009). Sustained acceleration of achievement in reading comprehension: The New Zealand experience. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 30–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langfred, C. W. (1998). Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance. Small Group Research, 29, 124–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, C. A. (2014). Social cohesion: Definition, measurement and developments. Aalborg University, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, S. J., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centred learning: Beyond “educational bulimia”? Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Wiesel, R. (2003). Indicators constituting the construct of ‘perceived community cohesion.’ Community Development Journal, 38(4), 332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyens, S. M., & Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: Introducing a multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36(5–6), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. S., Cooper, J. L., Davidson, N., & Hawkes, P. (1995). Building bridges between cooperative and collaborative learning. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 27(4), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagowah, L., & Nagowah, S. (2009). A reflection on the dominant learning theories: Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism. International Journal of Learning, 16(2), 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistorova, S., & Slutsky, R. (2017). There is still nothing better than quality play experiences for young children’s learning and development: Building the foundation for inquiry in our educational practices. Early Child Development and Care, 1–13.

  • Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. (2008). Making thinking visible. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban system reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 669–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M., & Rosenfeld, S. (2006). Understanding teacher responses to constructivist learning environments: Challenges and resolutions. Science Education, 90, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sariasih, W. (2019). Improving students’ writing and motivation using cooperative and collaborative learning in teaching writing to English department students of Universitata Pamulang. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 13(1), 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering critical thinking and question-posing skill in an innovative learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, S., & Klosterman, P. (2020). Nature of learning environment in concurrent enrollment mathematics classrooms: A cluster analysis. Learning Environments Research, 23(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09295-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svinicki, M. D. (1999). New directions in learning and motivation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999(80), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. S. (2005). Instructional leadership challenges: The case of using student achievement information for instructional improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swol, L. M., & Kane, A. A. (2019). Language and group processes: An integrative, interdisciplinary review. Small Group Research, 50(1), 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaserfeld, V. (1991). Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In F. Steier (Ed.), Research and reflecting (pp. 12–29). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2010). 21st century skills. Discussienota. Zoetermeer: The Netherlands: Kennisnet, 23(03), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wech, B. A., Mossholder, K. W., Steel, R. P., & Bennett, N. (1998). Does work group cohesiveness affect individuals’ performance and organizational commitment? A cross-level examination. Small Group Research, 29, 472–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, K., Hensley, L. C., Law, V., & Sun, Z. (2019). Self-regulation as a function of perceived leadership and cohesion in small group online collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 456–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tel-Hai College, Qiryat Shemona, Israel

    Irit Sasson

  2. Shamir Research Institute, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Irit Sasson, Noam Malkinson & Tutia Oria

Authors
  1. Irit Sasson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noam Malkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tutia Oria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irit Sasson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasson, I., Malkinson, N. & Oria, T. A constructivist redesigning of the learning space: the development of a sense of class cohesion. Learning Environ Res 25, 183–197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09356-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09356-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation