Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 300–307 | Cite as

Giant Cicada Emergence, Protandry and Chorus Centers Formation as Revealed by Studies Using a Sound Trap

  • Samuel de Carvalho Andrade
  • Nilza Maria Martinelli
  • Guilherme D. Rossi
  • Daniel J. Andrade


The giant cicada, Quesada gigas (Olivier) (Hemiptera: Cicadidae), is an important coffee pest and information about the behavior and reproduction of this species, e.g. emergence, senescence and ovarian maturation status, can be valuable to understand giant cicada ecology and to improve the use of a sound trap as a control method. A great number of Q. gigas adult males and females was captured using a sound trap and a protandrous type of emergence possibly associated with chorus centers formation was observed. All giant cicadas collected until 14–15 days after the beginning of male emergence (DAME) had immature ovaries at two different years of evaluation. On the other hand, the majority of cicadas collected from 20 until 48 DAME had mature ovaries with visible chorionated oocytes. Despite the use of the sound trap to collect insects for ecological studies, we believe that next generations of Q. gigas can be reduced by using this sound trap to hinder the formation of giant cicada chorus centers, to reduce male availability to copulate with females and to reduce the number of females to oviposit in coffee plants.


Coffea arabica Quesada gigas phonotaxis behavioral control 



The authors thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for the scholarship for SCA, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for research Grant (14/06137-0) and Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG) for allowing the use of experimental areas. We also thank Professor Tomomassa Matuo for the donation of the improved version of the sound trap used in this study to the Departamento de Fitossanidade and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable contribution.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Alexander RD, Moore TE (1958) Studies on the acoustical behavior of seventeen-year cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada). Ohio J Sci 58:107–127Google Scholar
  2. Cooley JR (2001) Long-range acoustical signals, phonotaxis, and risk in the sexual pair-forming behaviors of Okanagana canadensis and O. rimosa (Hemiptera: Cicadidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:755–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Decaro Junior ST, Martinelli NM, Maccagnan DHB, Ribeiro ESDBP (2012) Oviposition of Quesada gigas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) in coffee plants. Rev Colomb Entomol 38:1–5Google Scholar
  4. Foster SP, Harris MO (1997) Behavioral manipulation methods for insect pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 42:123–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gwynne DT (1984) Male mating effort, confidence of paternity, and insect sperm competition. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 117–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ishaaya I, Horowitz AR (2009) Biorational control of arthropod pests: application and resistance management. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, p 404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kahn MC, Offenhauser W (1949) The first field tests of recorded mosquito sounds used for mosquito destruction. AmJTrop Med Hyg 29:811–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karban R (1981) Flight and dispersal of periodical cicadas. Oecologia 49:385–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Luo C, Wei C (2015) Intraspecific sexual mimicry for finding females in a cicada: males produce ‘female sounds’ to gain reproductive benefit. Anim Behav 102:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maccagnan DHB (2008) Cigarra (Hemiptera: Cicadidae): emergência, comportamento acústico e desenvolvimento de armadilha sonora. PhD Thesis, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras da Universidade de São PauloGoogle Scholar
  11. Maccagnan DHB, Martinelli NM (2004) Descrição das ninfas de Quesada gigas (Olivier) (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) associadas ao cafeeiro. Neotrop Entomol 33:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mankin RW (2012) Applications of acoustics in insect pest management. CAB Reviews 7:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martinelli NM (2004) Cigarras associadas ao cafeeiro. In: Salvadori JR, Ávila CJ, Silva MTB (eds) Pragas de solo no Brasil. Espiral Comércio de Livros, Passo Fundo, pp 517–541Google Scholar
  14. Martinelli NM, Zucchi RA (1997) Cigarras (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Tibicinidae). Distribuição, hospedeiros e chave para as espécies. An da Soc Entomol Brasil 26:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mehdipour M, Zamanian H, Farazmand H, Hosseini-Gharalari A (2016) Disruption of reproductive behavior of grapevine cicada, Cicadatra alhageos, by acoustic signals playback. Entomol Exp Appl 158:210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Metcalf ZP (1963) General catalogue of the Homoptera, fascicle VIII. Cicadoidea. Part 1. Cicadidae. Section 1. Tibiceninae. North Caroline State College Contribution 1502:1–585Google Scholar
  17. Offenhauser WH, Kahn MC (1949) The sounds of disease-carrying mosquitoes. J Acoust Soc Am 21:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reis PR, Souza JC, Venzon M (2002) Manejo ecológico das principais pragas do cafeeiro. Informe Agropecuário 23:83–99Google Scholar
  19. Souza JC, Reis PR, Silva RA (2007) Cigarras-do-cafeeiro em Minas Gerais: histórico, reconhecimento, biologia, prejuízos e controle. Boletim técnico 80, 2nd ed. EPAMIG, Belo Horizonte, p 48Google Scholar
  20. Swevers L, Raikhel AS, Sappington TW, Shirk P, Iatrou K (2005) Vitellogenesis and post-vitellogenic maturation of the insect ovarian follicle. In: Gilbert LI, Iatrou K, Gill SS (eds) Comprehensive molecular insect science, vol 1. Elsevier Pergamon, Oxford, pp 87–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ulagaraj SM, Walker TJ (1973) Phonotaxis of crickets in flight: attraction of male and female crickets to male calling songs. Science 182:1278–1279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Villet MH (1992) Responses of free-living cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae) to broadcasts of cicada songs. J Entomol Soc South Afr 55:93–97Google Scholar
  23. Walker TJ (1988) Acoustic traps for agriculturally important insects. Fla Entomol 71:484–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams KS, Simon C (1995) The ecology, behavior and evolution of periodical cicadas. Annu Rev Entomol 40:269–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Williams KS, Smith KG (1991) Dynamics of periodical cicada chorus centers (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada). J lnsect Behav 4:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams KS, Smith KG, Stephen FM (1993) Emergence of 13-yr periodical cicadas (Cicadidae: Magicicada): phenology, mortality, and predator satiation. Ecology 74:1143–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Agricultural and Veterinarian SciencesSão Paulo State University (Unesp)JaboticabalBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de FitossanidadeJaboticabalBrazil

Personalised recommendations