The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 429–450 | Cite as

Inequality of opportunity in Italy

Article

Abstract

In this paper we provide a methodology to measure opportunity inequality and to decompose overall income inequality in an “ethically offensive” and an “ethically acceptable” part. Moreover, we analyze inequality of opportunity in Italy. According to our results, inequality of opportunity accounts for about 20% of overall income inequality in Italy. Moreover, the regions in the South are characterized by a higher degree of opportunity inequality than the regions in the North, especially when considering population subgroups by gender.

Keywords

Inequality of opportunity Income inequality Intergenerational mobility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alesina, A., La Ferrara, E.: Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. J. Public Econ. 89, 897–931 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arneson, R.: Equality of opportunity for welfare. Philos. Stud. 56, 77–93 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bossert, W.: Redistribution mechanisms based on individual characteristics. Math. Soc. Sci. 29, 1–17 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H.G., Menendez, M.: Inequality of outcomes and inequality of opportunities in Brazil. DELTA working papers 24 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H.G., Walton, M.: Equity, efficiency and inequality traps: a research agenda. J. Econ. Inequal. 5, 235–256 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Checchi, D., Dardanoni, V.: Mobility comparisons: does using different measures matter? Res. Econ. Inequal. 9, 113–145 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Checchi, D., Peragine, V.: Regional disparities and inequality of opportunity: the case of Italy. IZA discussion paper no. 1874/2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Checchi, D., Peragine, V., Serlenga, L.: Income inequality and opportunity inequality in Europe. mimeo (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, G.A.: On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99, 906–944 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dardanoni, V., Fields, G., Roemer, J., Sanchez Puerta, M.: How demanding should equality of opportunity be, and how much have we achieved? In: Morgan, S.L., Grusky, D., Fields, G. (eds.) Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Research in Sociology and Economics. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Devooght, K.: To each the same and to each his own. A proposal to measure responsibility-sensitive income inequality. C.E.S. discussion paper DPS 04.49 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dworkin, R.: What is equality? Part1: equality of welfare. Philos. Public Aff. 10, 185–246, 283–345 (1981a)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dworkin, R.: What is equality? Part2: equality of resources. Philos. Public Aff. 10, 185–246, 283–345 (1981b)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferreira, F., Gignoux, J.: Inequality of economic opportunity in Latin America. mimeo (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flaurbaey, M., Peragine, V.: Ex ante versus ex post equality of opportunity. mimeo (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fleurbaey, M.: Three solutions for the compensation problem. J. Econ. Theory 65, 505–521 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleurbaey, M.: Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare. Oxford University Press, London (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleurbaey, M., Maniquet, F.: Compensation and responsibility. In: Arrow, K., Sen, A., Suzumura, K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Elsevier, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Foster, J.E., Shneyerov, A.A.: Path independent inequality measures. J. Econ. Theory 91, 199–222 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goux, D., Maurin, E.: On the evaluation of equality of opportunity for income: axioms and evidence. mimeo, INSEE (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., Trannoy, A.: Inequality of opportunities vs inequality of outcomes: are Western Societies all alike? Working papers 54, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moreno-Ternero, J.: On the design of equal-opportunity policies. Investig. Econ. 31, 351–374 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peragine, V.: Opportunity egalitarianism and income inequality: the rank-dependent approach. Math. Soc. Sci. 44, 45–64 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peragine, V.: Measuring and implementing equality of opportunity for income. Soc. Choice Welf. 22, 1–24 (2004a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peragine, V.: Ranking income distributions according to equality of opportunity. J. Econ. Inequal. 2, 11–30 (2004b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peragine, V., Serlenga, L.: Equality of opportunity for higher education in Italy. In: Bishop, J., Zheng, B. (eds.) Research in Economic Inequality, vol. 12 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pistolesi, N.: Inequality of opportunity in the land of opportunities, 1968–201. mimeo (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1971)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roemer, J.E.: A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos. Public Aff. 22, 146–166 (1993)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roemer, J.E.: Equality of Opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ruiz-Castillo, J.: The measurement of inequality of opportunities. In: Bishop, J., Amiel, Y. (eds.) Research in Economic Inequality, vol. 9, pp. 1–34 (2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van de Gaer, D.: Equality of opportunity and investment in human capital. Ph.D. dissertation, Catholic University of Louvain (1993)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Villar, A.: On the welfare evaluation of income and opportunity. In: Contributions to Theoretical Economics, vol. 5, pp. 1129–1129. Berkeley Electronic Press (2006)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    World Bank: World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development. The World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, DC (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MilanMilanItaly
  2. 2.University of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations