Photoinduced Electron Transfer Reactions of Hexarhenium(III) Cluster: Oxidative Quenching of [Re6S8Cl6]4− Emission by Electron Acceptors
- 741 Downloads
The photoredox ability of a hexarhenium(III) cluster, [Re6(μ3-S)8Cl6]4−, in acetonitrile was examined on the basis of the emission quenching experiments of the cluster by a series of neutral organic electron acceptors (A). The photoinduced electron transfer quenching rate constants and the relevant activation parameters demonstrated that the hexarhenium(III) cluster acted as a useful photoredox sensitizer towards various A and the system gave a high charge separation yield owing to electrostatic repulsion between the product ions: [Re6(μ3-S)8Cl6]3− and A−. These results were proved explicitly by nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy.
KeywordsHexarhenium(III) cluster Photoinduced electron transfer Charge separation
Photoinduced electron transfer (PET) reactions are the fundamental basis of chemical conversion of light energy as well as of synthetic organic photochemistry, and the related studies have been conducted extensively among the past decades [1, 2]. For photocatalytic reactions by redox sensitizers, transition metal complexes are widely employed. In particular, polypyridine ruthenium(II) complexes (RuL32+, L = polypyridine or polydiazine ligand) have been studied extensively [1, 2, 3, 4], since the complexes in general possess absorption in the visible region and long excited state lifetime in solution at room temperature. Furthermore, it is well known that some of RuL32+ possesses strong reduction and oxidation abilities towards various substrates: electron acceptors (A) and donors (D) [1, 2, 3, 4]. In practice, various RuL32+ complexes represented by Ru(bpy)32+ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) have been shown to be potential photoredox sensitizers [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. It is worth emphasizing that, however, it is certainly true that PET reactions of RuL32+ with D give rise to high ion product yields, while those with A do not afford free ions efficiently (i.e., RuL33+ and A−). This is simply because that oxidative quenching of RuL32+ by A produces electrostatically-attractive ion pair (RuL33+ and A−), while reductive quenching affords an electrostatically repulsive RuL3+–D+ pair [5, 6, 7]. For constructing efficient photoredox systems, therefore, the electrostatic interaction in a product ion pair is worth considering and studying in detail.
We reported previously, on the other hand, that hexarhenium(III) clusters, [Re6(μ3-S)8X6]4− (X = Cl−, Br−, I−, and so forth), showed relatively intense room temperature emission in the visible ~ near infrared region (600–1,000 nm) with the emission lifetime (τ) and quantum yield (Φ) in acetonitrile being τ = 4–11 μs and Φ = 0.015–0.056, respectively . Later, several research groups have reported that various [Re6E8L6]z (E = S, Se, or Te; L = X [8, 9, 10, 11], CN [11, 12, 13], OH/H2O [12, 13, 14], NCS , N-heteroaromatics [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21], phosphine derivatives [17, 18, 22, 23], HCOO , CH3COO , and N3 ,) clusters showed intense and long-lived emission in solution and solid phases at room temperature. It is worth noting that the τ values of the some of [Re6E8L6]z clusters in deaerated acetonitrile are much longer (τ = 4–11 μs) than that of Ru(bpy)32+ (τ = 850 ns in acetonitrile at 298 K). As another unique characteristics, furthermore, [Re6E8L6]z possesses a strong reducing ability. As a typical example, the oxidation potential of [Re6S8Cl6]4− (=[Re6]4−) in acetonitrile is +0.27 V (vs. saturated calomel electrode (SCE)) and, thus, the redox ability of [Re6]4− is remarkable [20, 27, 28]. Owing to the long excited-state lifetime and the strong redox ability, [Re6]4− is thus expected to act as an efficient photoredox sensitizer in various systems. For oxidative quenching of the excited triplet state of [Re6]4− by a neutral electron acceptor (A), in particular, the negative charges on the cluster suggest very strong electrostatic repulsion between the product ions, [Re6]3− and A−, and, thus, the system enables a high charge separation yield. A detailed study on PET emission quenching of [Re6]4− by electron acceptors would thus contribute to further progresses in the photoredox chemistry of transition metal complexes. In this paper, we demonstrate that [Re6S8Cl6]4− undergoes efficient PET reactions with various electron acceptors in acetonitrile .
PET emission quenching of [Re6S8Cl6]4− by neutral electron acceptors (A) in acetonitrile
Electron acceptors (A)
(E(A/A−) V. vs. SCE)
3.5 × 108 (0.505)
4.4 × 107 (0.452)
2.4 × 108 (0.496)
2.7 × 108 (0.499)
1.0 × 109 (0.533)
Methyl 3-nitrobenzoate (−1.06)
3.1 × 109 (0.562)
Methyl 4-nitrobenzoate (−0.95)
6.4 × 109 (0.580)
2.5 x 1010 (0.615)
Tetrachlorophthalic anhydride (−0.84)
7.6 × 109 (0.585)
3.4 × 1010 (0.623)
Pyromellitic dianhydride (−0.53)
1.3 × 1010 (0.599)
5.7 × 1010 (0.636)
3.2 × 1010 (0.622)
Emission Spectroscopy and Other Measurements
Steady-state emission quenching experiments of [Re6]4− by A in CH3CN at a given temperature (T) were performed with a Hitachi F-4500 spectrofluorometer. Emission lifetime measurements were conducted by using a Nd3+:YAG laser (Continum Surelite II, 355 nm, ~6 ns pulse-width) as an excitation light source and a streak camera system (Hamamatsu Photonics, C4334) as a photodetector. In both cases, sample temperature was controlled within 1 °C (13–58 °C) by circulating thermostated water to a sample cell holder by using a thermo-electronic controller (Hitachi 250-0346 or Yamato-Komatsu COOLNICS CTE42A). Sample solutions were deaerated thoroughly by purging an Ar-gas stream over 20 min and sealed at the constriction of a cell prior to the experiments. Cyclic voltammetry of [Re6]4− or A in CH3CN was carried out by using an electrochemical analyzer (ALS, model 701A) with tetra-n-butylammonium hexafluorophosphate (0.1 M) as a supporting electrolyte.
Nanosecond Time-Resolved Absorption Spectroscopy
Nanosecond 355-nm laser pulses mentioned above were used for excitation of a sample solution. Timing between the laser and a pulsed Xe lamp as a monitoring light source (150 W, Tokyo Instruments Inc.) was controlled by a digital delay generator (DG535, Stanford Research Systems Inc.) and the transient absorption spectrum was measured by a gated multichannel photodiode detector (SMA, Princeton Instruments Inc.) equipped with a polychromator (Jovin-Yvon HR-320).
Determination of the Quenching Rate Constant and Other Parameters
A bimolecular quenching rate constant (ko) in CH3CN at a given temperature (T) was determined by the slope value of the Stern–Volmer plot on the basis of emission intensity or lifetime measurements. For the emission intensity quenching experiments, the emission lifetime of [Re6]4− in the absence of A (τ) at a given T was determined by separate experiments. Every emission decay determined at around 700 nm obeyed a single exponential function in the T range of 13–58 °C, which was used to calculate ko at a given T. Since ko determined by the emission intensity measurements agreed very well with that by the emission lifetime measurements irrespective of A, the quenching reaction of [Re6]4− by A was concluded to proceed in a dynamic pathway.
Results and Discussion
Kinetic Analysis of PET Emission Quenching of [Re6S8Cl6]4− by Neutral Organic Electron Acceptors
In Eq. 4, Za and Zb are the charge numbers of the two reactants for wr and those of the two product ions for wp and, e and ε are the elemental electron charge and the static dielectric constant of CH3CN (37.5), respectively. In the present experiments, since we used neutral quenchers throughout the study, wr was zero and wp = –0.12 V. The ∆G23 value calculated for each A is included in Table 1. It is clear that the ∆G23 values are sufficiently negative (i.e., exoergonic) for all quenchers and the kq value increases with a negative increase in ∆G23. The results are readily understood by PET emission quenching of [Re6]4−.
Temperature Dependence of PET Emission Quenching of [Re6S8Cl6]4− by A
We studied the T (285–331 K) dependence of PET emission quenching of [Re6]4− by 13 electron acceptors in CH3CN. The activation free energy (∆G23*), activation enthalpy (∆H23*), and activation entropy (∆S23*) thus determined by the Eyring plots (ln(kq/T) vs. T−1) are included in Table 1.
As seen in Table 1, a negative increase in ∆G23 from −4.4 to −34.1 kcal/mol rendered the decreases in both ∆G23* (from 6–7 to ~3 kcal/mol) and ∆H23* (from 3–4 to 0.5–1.0 kcal/mol), while ∆S23* was remained almost constant at −8 ~ −11 eu (=cal/mol deg) irrespective of ∆G23: T∆S23* = −2.4 ~ −3.3 kcal/mol at 298 K. Such results remind us the T dependence of reductive quenching of Ru(bpy)32+ (= [Ru]2+) by aromatic amines (D) , in which the analogous ∆G23 dependences of the activation parameters with those determined in the present study have been observed. In the case of oxidative quenching of [Ru]2+ by A , on the other hand, a negative increase in ∆G23 resulted in apparent negative ∆H23* values and a large decrease in ∆S23*. The results for PET quenching of [Ru]2+ have been explained in terms of the electrostatic interaction in the product ion pair, [[R6u]3+···A−]. For a [Ru]2+ − D system, namely, the electrostatic interaction between the product ions is repulsive ([[Ru]+···D+]) and, this usually leads to the ∆G23 dependences of the activation parameters as described above. On the other hand, since the PET reaction of a [Ru]2+ − A system produces an electrostatically–attractive ion pair ([[Ru]3+···A−]), back electron transfer from the ion pair to the excited state encounter complex proceeds very efficiently, rendering an apparent negative ∆H23* value and a large decrease in ∆S23* of the quenching, as reported in detail previously [5, 6, 7]. Since oxidative quenching of the excited triplet state of [Re6]4− by A produces an electrostatically–repulsive product ion pair ([[Re6]3−···A−]), the analogous T dependences of the activation parameters with those for reductive quenching of [Ru]2+ is quite reasonable. Thus, it can be concluded that the PET reaction of a [Re6]4− − A system undergoes by the Case I mechanism (i.e., k30 ≫ k32), which agrees very well with the conclusion of the kinetic analysis of the data in Fig. 1.
Transient Absorption Spectrocopy of [Re6S8Cl6]4−: Pyromellitic Dianhydride (PDA) System
As a reference system producing an electrostatically-attractive product ion pair by PET, we also studied transient absorption of a pyrene (Py)—PDA system as shown in Fig. S1 in Supporting Information. As seen in Fig. S1, the absorption band of the Py cation radical was observed at around 445 nm in addition to the absorption bands of the anion radical of PDA. Both the anion radical of PDA and the cation radical of Py decayed by the second-order kinetics and the decay rate constants of the Py cation radical (ε = 4.5 × 104 /M/cm at λ = 445 nm) and the PDA anion radical were 1.8 × 1010 and 1.4 × 1010 /M/s, respectively, whose values were 50 ~ 60 times faster than that of the PDA anion radical produced in the [Re6]4− − PDA system. These results demonstrate explicitly that the electrostatic interaction between the product ions governs the charge separation yield and the lifetimes of the free ions produced by a PET reaction. In the present [Re6]4− − A system, thus, the negative charges on [Re6]4− plays decisive role in determining the reaction mechanism (Case I) and the charge separation yield of the PET reaction.
The present study demonstrated that hexarhenium(III) complex, [Re6S8Cl6]4− = [Re6]4−, possesses a high photoredox ability toward a neutral electron acceptor, as proven by the kinetic analysis of the PET emission quenching rate constant, the relevant activation parameters, and nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. It has been also demonstrated that the electrostatic interaction between the product ion pair produced by PET is the one of the important factors determining the charge separation yield of the product ion pair. Besides [Re6S8Cl6]4−, a number of negatively-charged hexarhenium(III) clusters with different oxidation potentials have been hitherto reported and such clusters will be also acted as a strong photoredox sensitizer or catalyst.
- 1.M. A. Fox and M. Channon (eds.) Photoinduced Electron Transfer, vol. A–D (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988).Google Scholar
- 2.V. Balzani (ed.) Electron Transfer in Chemistry, vol. 1–5 (Wiley, Weinheim, 2001).Google Scholar
- 4.K. Kalyanasundaram Photochemistry of Polypyridine and Porphyrin Complexes (Academic Press, London, 1992).Google Scholar
- 28.T. Yoshimura (2000), Ph. D Thesis, Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.