Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 45, Issue 12, pp 4064–4073 | Cite as

The Relationship Between Subthreshold Autistic Traits, Ambiguous Figure Perception and Divergent Thinking

  • Catherine Best
  • Shruti Arora
  • Fiona Porter
  • Martin Doherty
Original Paper

Abstract

This research investigates the paradox of creativity in autism. That is, whether people with subclinical autistic traits have cognitive styles conducive to creativity or whether they are disadvantaged by the implied cognitive and behavioural rigidity of the autism phenotype. The relationship between divergent thinking (a cognitive component of creativity), perception of ambiguous figures, and self-reported autistic traits was evaluated in 312 individuals in a non-clinical sample. High levels of autistic traits were significantly associated with lower fluency scores on the divergent thinking tasks. However autistic traits were associated with high numbers of unusual responses on the divergent thinking tasks. Generation of novel ideas is a prerequisite for creative problem solving and may be an adaptive advantage associated with autistic traits.

Keywords

Autism Ambiguous figures Creativity Autistic traits Divergent thinking 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the participants in the online survey and the autism charities that helped us to recruit for this research project including ‘Scottish Autism’ and ‘Autism Speaks!’ The research was supported by a Nuffield Foundation Research Placement to the second author.

Author contributions

CB and MD devised the study. CB wrote the first draft of the manuscript and CB and MD both revised it. FP developed and administrated the online survey. FP conducted initial data analysis. SA coded participant responses and completed further data analysis. All authors read and commented on the first draft of the manuscript.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & cognition, 42(7), 1186–1197. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: Effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 7(4), 341–349. doi:10.1037/a0033644.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57(1), 289–300.Google Scholar
  6. Best, C. S., Moffat, V. J., Power, M. J., Owens, D. G. C., & Johnstone, E. C. (2007). The boundaries of the cognitive phenotype of autism: Theory of mind, central coherence and ambiguous figure perception in young people with autistic traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(5), 840–847. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0451-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Claridge, G., & McDonald, A. (2009). An investigation into the relationships between convergent and divergent thinking, schizotypy, and autistic traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(8), 794–799. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Constantino, J. N. (2011). The quantitative nature of autistic social impairment. Pediatric Research, 69, 55R–62R.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Creativity and imagination in autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(4), 319–326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cropley, A. J., & Maslany, G. W. (1969). Reliability and factorial validity of the Wallach–Kogan creativity tests. British Journal of Psychology, 60(3), 395–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Doherty, M. J., & Mair, S. (2012). Creativity, ambiguous figures, and academic preference. Perception, 41(10), 1262–1266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald, M. (2004). Autism and creativity: Is there a link between autism in men and exceptional ability? (p. 304). Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98(Pt 4), 611–625. doi:10.1348/096317907X173421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gold, R., Faust, M., & Goldstein, A. (2010). Semantic integration during metaphor comprehension in Asperger syndrome. Brain and Language, 113, 124–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., Merrifield, P. R., & Wilson, R. C. (1978). Alternate uses: Manual of instructions and interpretations. Orange, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  16. Guilford J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Happé, F. (1999). Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 216–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Happé, F., & Ronald, A. (2008). The ‘fractionable autism triad’: A review of evidence from behavioural, genetic, cognitive and neural research. Neuropsychology Review, 18(4), 287–304. doi:10.1007/s11065-008-9076-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Happé, F., & Vital, P. (2009). What aspects of autism predispose to talent? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1369–1375. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Intaite, M., Koivisto, M., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2014). The linear impact of concurrent working memory load on dynamics of Necker cube perceptual reversals. Journal of Vision, 14(1). doi:10.1167/14.1.13.
  21. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212–221.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanne, S. M., Wang, J., & Christ, S. E. (2011). The Subthreshold Autism Trait Questionnaire (SATQ): Development of a brief self-report measure of subthreshold autism traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(5), 769–780. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1308-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kasirer, A., & Mashal, N. (2014). Verbal creativity in autism: Comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and typical development. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 615. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00615.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim, H. K. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 57–66.Google Scholar
  25. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu, M.-J., Shih, W.-L., & Ma, L.-Y. (2011). Are children with Asperger syndrome creative in divergent thinking and feeling? A brief report. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 116, 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2010.04.011.Google Scholar
  27. Long, G. M., & Toppino, T. C. (2004). Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 748–768.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mottron, L. (2011). Changing perceptions: The power of autism. Nature, 479(7371), 33–35. doi:10.1038/479033a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nettle, D., & Clegg, H. (2006). Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(1586), 611–615. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3349.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nishiyama, T., Suzuki, M., Adachi, K., Sumi, S., Okada, K., Kishino, H., & Kanne, S. M. (2014). Comprehensive comparison of self-administered questionnaires for measuring quantitative autistic traits in adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(5), 993–1007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: What instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pring, L., Ryder, N., Crane, L., & Hermelin, B. (2012). Creativity in savant artists with autism. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 16(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Radua, J., Fusar-Poli, P., Mataix-Cols, D., Rubia, K., & de Schotten, M. T. (2015). Seed-based d mapping (formerly signed differential mapping)—FDR online calculator. Retrieved June 22, 2015, from http://www.sdmproject.com/utilities/?show=FDR.
  35. Robinson, E. B., Koenen, K. C., McCormick, M. C., Munir, K., Hallett, V., Happé, F., & Ronald, A. (2011). A multivariate twin study of autistic traits in 12-year-olds: Testing the fractionable autism triad hypothesis. Behavior Genetics, 42(2), 245–255. doi:10.1007/s10519-011-9500-3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ronald, A., Happé, F., Bolton, P., Butcher, L. M., Price, T. S., Wheelwright, S., & Plomin, R. (2006). Genetic heterogeneity between the three components of the autism spectrum: A twin study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 691–699.Google Scholar
  37. Ropar, D., Mitchell, P., & Ackroyd, K. (2003). Do children with autism find it difficult to offer alternative interpretations to ambiguous figures? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 387–395. doi:10.1348/026151003322277766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010). The atypical development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with autism. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 14(1), 29–46. doi:10.1177/1362361309340667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scott, F. J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1996). Imagining real and unreal things: Evidence of a dissociation in autism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(4), 371–382. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.4.371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sobel, D. M., Capps, L. M., & Gopnik, A. (2005). Ambiguous figure perception and theory of mind understanding in children with autistic spectrum disorders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
  45. Treffert, D. A. (2009). The savant syndrome: An extraordinary condition. A synopsis: Past, present, future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1522), 1351–1357. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Treffert, D. A. (2014). Savant syndrome: Realities, myths and misconceptions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(3), 564–571. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1906-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner, M. (1999). Generating novel ideas: Fluency performance in high-functioning and learning disabled individuals with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 189–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  49. Wimmer, M. C., & Doherty, M. J. (2010). Children with autism’s perception and understanding of ambiguous figures: Evidence for pictoral metarepresentation, a research note. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 627–641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wimmer, M. C., & Doherty, M. J. (2011). The development of ambiguous figure perception. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(1), 1–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wing, L. (1981). Language, social, and cognitive impairments in autism and severe mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11(1), 31–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiseman, R., Watt, C., Gilhooly, K., & Georgiou, G. (2011). Creativity and ease of ambiguous figural reversal. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 615–622.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Best
    • 1
  • Shruti Arora
    • 2
  • Fiona Porter
    • 2
  • Martin Doherty
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Health SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
  2. 2.Psychology, School of Natural SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
  3. 3.School of PsychologyUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations