Skip to main content
Log in

The Boundaries of the Cognitive Phenotype of Autism: Theory of Mind, Central Coherence and Ambiguous Figure Perception in Young People with Autistic Traits

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theory of Mind, Weak Central Coherence and executive dysfunction, were investigated as a function of behavioural markers of autism. This was irrespective of the presence or absence of a diagnosis of an autistic spectrum disorder. Sixty young people completed the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), false belief tests, the block design test, viewed visual illusions and an ambiguous figure. A logistic regression was performed and it was found that Theory of Mind, central coherence and ambiguous figure variables significantly contributed to prediction of behavioural markers of autism. These findings provide support for the continuum hypothesis of autism. That is, mild autistic behavioural traits are distributed through the population and these behavioural traits may have the same underlying cognitive determinants as autistic disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC.

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., et al. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., et al. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berument, S. K., Rutter, M., Lord, C., et al. (1999). Autism screening questionnaire: Diagnostic validity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 444–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E., & Shapero, D. (2005). Ambiguous benefits: The effect of bilingualism on reversing ambiguous figures. Developmental Science, 8, 595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CACI. (2003). ACORN http://www.caci.co.uk/acorn/

  • Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act. In 2004 asp 4. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/acts2004/20040004.htm.

  • Gopnik, A., & Rosati, A. (2001). Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representations. Developmental Science, 4, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F. (1996). Studying weak central coherence at low levels: Children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 873–877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 5–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., Ronald, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1218–1220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, E. C., Owens, D. G., Hoare, P., et al. (2007). Schizotypal cognitions as a predictor of psychopathology in adolescents with mild intellectual impairment. British Journal of Psychiatry (in press).

  • Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous child, 2, 217–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunihira, Y., Senju, A., Dairoku, H., et al. (2006). ‘Autistic’ traits in non-autistic Japanese populations: Relationships with personality traits and cognitive ability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(4), 553–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council. (2001). MRC review of autism research: Epidemiology and causes. Medical Research Council.

  • Miller, P., Byrne, M., Hodges, A., et al. (2002). Schizotypal components in people at high risk of developing schizophrenia: Early findings from the Edinburgh high-risk study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 179–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (1999). Are individuals with autism and Asperger’s syndrome susceptible to visual illusions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 1283–1293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (2001). Susceptibility to illusions and performance on visuospatial tasks in individuals with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 539–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ropar, D., Mitchell, P., & Ackroyd, K. (2003). Do children with autism find it difficult to offer alternative interpretations to ambiguous figures? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell J. (Ed). (1997). Autism as an executive disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1993). Why do autistic individuals show superior performance on the block design task? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 1351–1364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M., Capps, L., & Gopnik, A. (2005). Ambiguous figure perception and theory of mind understanding in children with autistic spectrum disorders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). London: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). London: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, L. (1988). Autism: Possible clues to the underlying pathology: 1. clinical facts. In L. Wing (Ed.), Aspects of autism-biological research. London: Gaskell.

  • Yirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica-Levi, D. (1998). Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 283–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Catherine S. Best was supported for the duration of this research by a Medical Research Council PhD studentship and this work forms part of her PhD thesis. We would like to thank all the young people who took part in this study and the schools and colleges across Scotland who assisted us with recruitment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine S. Best.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Best, C.S., Moffat, V.J., Power, M.J. et al. The Boundaries of the Cognitive Phenotype of Autism: Theory of Mind, Central Coherence and Ambiguous Figure Perception in Young People with Autistic Traits. J Autism Dev Disord 38, 840–847 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0451-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0451-8

Keywords

Navigation