Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 127–141

Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk

Article

Abstract

Spontaneous gesture produced in conjunction with speech is considered as both a source of data about mathematical thinking, and as an integral modality in communication and cognition. The analysis draws on a corpus of more than 200 gestures collected during 3 h of interviews with prospective elementary school teachers on the topic of fractions. The analysis examines how gestures express meaning, utilizing the framework of cognitive linguistics to argue that gestures are both composed of, and provide inputs to, conceptual blends for mathematical ideas, and a standard typology drawn from gesture studies is extended to address the function of gestures within mathematics more appropriately.

Keywords

Conceptual blends Discourse Embodiment Fractions Gesture Metaphor 

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MOV 1.10 MB)

ESM 2

(MOV 1.06 MB)

References

  1. Alibali, M. W., & diRusso, A. (1999). The function of gesture in learning to count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigacion en Matemática Educativa, Numero Especial, 267–299.Google Scholar
  4. Bazzini, L. (1991). From grounding metaphors to technological devices: A call for legitimacy in school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio, and proportion. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 296–333). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Symbolizing and mathematizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner, & J. A. Whitson (Eds.) Situated cognition theory: Social, semiotic, and neurological perspectives (pp. 151–233). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, L. (2003). A natural history of mathematical gesture. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, April.Google Scholar
  9. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gestures: How our hands help us think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 720–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Singer, M. (2003). From children’s hands to adults’ ears: Gesture’s role in teaching and learning. Developmental Psychology, 39, 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham, T. (1999). The role of gesture in children’s learning to count. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, G. (2003). Arithmetic for teachers: With applications and topics from geometry. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  16. Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.) Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kita, S. (Ed.). (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Lamon, S. (1999). Teaching fractions and rational numbers for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. McNeill, D. (Ed.) (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 119–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Núñez, R. (2006). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.) 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 160–181). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nuñéz, R., Edwards, L., & Matos, J. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning. Gesture, 4(2), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pimm, D. (1981). Metaphor and analogy in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2, 47–50.Google Scholar
  32. Presmeg, N. (1992). Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies and imaginative rationality in high school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Presmeg, N. (1997). Reasoning with metaphors and metonymies in mathematical learning. In L. D. English (Ed.) Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors and images (pp. 267–279). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Presmeg, N. (2006). Semiotics and the “connections” standard: Significance of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14–23.Google Scholar
  36. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Radford, L., Demers, S., Guzmán, J., & Cerulli, M. (2003). Calculators, graphs, gestures, and the production of meaning. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA, (Vol.4, pp. 55–62). Honolulu, HI, USA: University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
  38. Reynolds, F., & Reeve, R. (2002). Gesture in collaborative mathematics problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robutti, O. (2006). Motion, technology, gesture in interpreting graphs. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 13, 117–126.Google Scholar
  40. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, N. (2003). Gestures and beyond. A.B. Honors Thesis, University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved July 8 2008, from http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/∼njs/thesis/.
  42. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Mary’s College of CaliforniaMoragaUSA

Personalised recommendations