Abstract
The field of early childhood education (ECE) is currently unable to reach consensus on the extent to which ECE should be based on child development. One manifestation of this situation is the dilemma that early educators purportedly face between teaching the whole child and the curriculum, between developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) and standards. The source of this dilemma is attributed to a one-dimensional understanding of children’s development in which development is privileged over learning. Addressing this dilemma begins by discussing a theoretical difference between Piaget and Vygotsky: for Piaget, development drives learning; for Vygotsky, learning drives development. This seemingly dichotomous difference is reframed, however, by the insight that Piaget and Vygotsky focused on different types of development: Piaget studied universals (e.g., object permanence); Vygotsky studied nonuniversals (e.g., cultural tools often learned in schools). Their dispute stems, therefore, from this factor: development drives learning in nonuniversal developmental sequences, but learning drives development in universal sequences. Teachers who adopt a multi-dimensional developmental framework—a framework that makes visible how the relationship between learning and development may vary within universal versus nonuniversal developmental sequences—may be better prepared to (1) make informed decisions about the extent to which they should guide children’s activities and (2) avoid the DAP versus standards dilemma. The most recent iteration of DAP moved toward adopting a multi-dimensional developmental framework when it encouraged teachers to base instructional judgments on the extent to which children’s emerging capacities will likely require greater versus lesser degrees of adult guidance, structure, and support.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Anderson, J. E. (1947). The theory of early childhood education. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), The 46th yearbook of the National Society for the study of education; part 2: Early childhood education (pp. 70–100). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Barbarin, O., & Miller, K. (2009). Developmental science and education: An introduction. In O. Barbarin & B. Wasik (Eds.), Handbook of child development and early education (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Bereiter, C. (1970). Educational implications of Kohlberg’s cognitive-developmental view. Interchange, 1(1), 25–32.
Berk, L., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Blaise, M., & Ryan, S. (2012). Using critical theory to trouble the early childhood curriculum: Is it enough? In N. File, J. Mueller, & D. Wisneski (Eds.), Curriculum in early childhood: Reexamined, rediscovered, renewed (pp. 80–92). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bloch, M., Swadener, B., & Cannella, G. (2014). Reconceptualizing early childhood care & education: Critical questions, new imaginaries, and social activism: A reader. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Bowman, B. (1993). Early childhood education. Review of Research in Education, 101–134.
Bowman, B. (2006). Standards: At the heart of educational equity. Young Children, 61(5), 42–48.
Bowman, B., Donovan, M., & Burns, M. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age eight. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (rev ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bronnfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009a). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009b). To be an excellent teacher. In C. Copple & S. Bredekamp (Eds.), Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed., pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Daniels, D. H., & Shumow, L. (2003). Child development and classroom teaching: A review of the literature and implications for educating teachers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 495–526.
Edwards, S. (2003). New directions: Charting the paths for the role of sociocultural theory in early childhood education and curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(3), 251–266.
Epstein, A. (2006). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children’s learning. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Feldman, D. H. (1995). Learning and development in nonuniversal theory. Human Development, 38, 315–321.
Feldman, D. H., & Fowler, R. C. (1997). Piaget, Vygotsky, and the nature of developmental change. New Ideas in Psychology, 15(3), 195–210.
File, N. (2012). The relationship between child development and early childhood curriculum. In N. File, J. Mueller, & D. Wisneski (Eds.), Curriculum in early childhood education: Re-examined, rediscovered, renewed (pp. 29–41). New York, NY: Routledge.
Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Fowler, R. C. (1992). Siegler and Crowley’s (1991) conception of development. American Psychologist, 47(10), 1239–1240.
Geary, D. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50(1), 24–37.
Gelman, R., & Williams, E. M. (1998). Enabling constraints for cognitive development and learning: Domain-specificity and epigenesis. In W. Damon (Gen. Ed.), D. Kuhl, & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language (5th ed., pp. 575–630). New York, NY: Wiley.
Goldstein, L. S. (2007). Beyond the DAP versus standards dilemma: Examining the unforgiving complexity of kindergarten teaching in the United States. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(1), 39–54.
Graue, E. (2008). Teaching and learning in a post-DAP world. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 441–447.
Grieshaber, S. (2008). Interrupting stereotypes: Teaching and the education of young children. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 505–518.
Hatch, J. A. (2010). Rethinking the relationship between learning and development: Teaching for learning in early childhood classrooms. The Educational Forum, 74, 258–268.
Jersild, A. T. (1946). Child development and the curriculum. New York, NY: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Kamii, C., & DeVries, R. (1980). Group games in early education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Katz, L. G. (1996). Child development knowledge and teacher preparation: Confronting assumptions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11(2), 135–146.
Kessler, S., & Swadener, B. (Eds.). (1992). Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kohlberg, L., & Mayer, R. (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42(4), 449–498.
Lerner, R. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lubeck, S. (1998). Is developmentally appropriate practice for everyone? Childhood Education, 74(5), 283–292.
Mallory, B. L., & New, R. S. (1994). Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Moss, P. (2007). Meetings across the paradigmatic divide. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 229–245.
Neuman, S. B. (2006). The knowledge gap: Implications for early education. In D. Dickinson & S. Neumann (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 29–40). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Overton, W. F. (2003). Development across the life span. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.), R. Lerner, A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 6 Developmental psychology (pp. 13–42). New York, NY: Wiley.
Piaget, J. (1966). The psychology of intelligence. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York, NY: Viking Press; (Original work published 1948).
Pianta, R., Barnett, W., Justice, L., & Sheridan, S. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of early childhood education. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Pyle, A., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2014). Looking beyond the academic and developmental logics in kindergarten education: the role of Schwab’s commonplaces in classroom-based research. Early Child Development and Care, 184(12), 1960–1977.
Raines, S. C., & Johnston, J. M. (2003). Developmental appropriateness: New contexts and challenges. In J. P. Isenberg & M. R. Jalongo (Eds.), Major trends and issues in early childhood education: Challenges, controversies and insights (2nd ed., pp. 85–96). New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Rimm-Kauffman, S., & Wanless, S. (2012). An ecological perspective for understanding the early development of self-regulatory skill, social skills, and achievement. In R. Pianta, W. Barnett, L. Justice, & S. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood education (pp. 299–323). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Ryan, S., & Grieshaber, S. (2005). Shifting from developmental to postmodern practices in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(1), 34–45.
Salinas, C. M. (2014). Obama announces $1 billion in early childhood education programs. California, CA: Monterey Herald.
Schunk, D. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Seifert, K. (1983). Educational psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Siegler, R., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606–620.
Stott, F., & Bowman, B. (1996). Child development knowledge: A slippery base for practice. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11(2), 169–184.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Rieber & A. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 37–285). New York, NY: Plenum.
Weber, E. (1984). Ideas influencing early childhood education: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Wittrock, M. (Ed.). (1977). Learning and instruction. Berkeley, CA: McKutchan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fowler, R.C. Reframing the Debate About the Relationship Between Learning and Development: An Effort to Resolve Dilemmas and Reestablish Dialogue in a Fractured Field. Early Childhood Educ J 45, 155–162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0770-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0770-x