Skip to main content
Log in

Symptom Domain Groups of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Tools Independently Predict Hospitalizations and Re-hospitalizations in Cirrhosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tools can identify health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains that could differentially affect disease progression. Cirrhotics are highly prone to hospitalizations and re-hospitalizations, but the current clinical prognostic models may be insufficient, and thus studying the contribution of individual HRQOL domains could improve prognostication.

Aim

Analyze the impact of individual HRQOL PROMIS domains in predicting time to all non-elective hospitalizations and re-hospitalizations in cirrhosis.

Methods

Outpatient cirrhotics were administered PROMIS computerized tools. The first non-elective hospitalization and subsequent re-hospitalizations after enrollment were recorded. Individual PROMIS domains significantly contributing toward these outcomes were generated using principal component analysis. Factor analysis revealed three major PROMIS domain groups: daily function (fatigue, physical function, social roles/activities and sleep issues), mood (anxiety, anger, and depression), and pain (pain behavior/impact) accounted for 77% of the variability. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used for these groups to evaluate time to first hospitalization and re-hospitalization.

Results

A total of 286 patients [57 years, MELD 13, 67% men, 40% hepatic encephalopathy (HE)] were enrolled. Patients were followed at 6-month (mth) intervals for a median of 38 mths (IQR 22–47), during which 31% were hospitalized [median IQR mths 12.5 (3–27)] and 12% were re-hospitalized [10.5 mths (3–28)]. Time to first hospitalization was predicted by HE, HR 1.5 (CI 1.01–2.5, p = 0.04) and daily function PROMIS group HR 1.4 (CI 1.1–1.8, p = 0.01), independently. In contrast, the pain PROMIS group were predictive of the time to re-hospitalization HR 1.6 (CI 1.1–2.3, p = 0.03) as was HE, HR 2.1 (CI 1.1–4.3, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Daily function and pain HRQOL domain groups using PROMIS tools independently predict hospitalizations and re-hospitalizations in cirrhotic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HE:

Hepatic encephalopathy

MELD:

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)

PRO:

Patient-reported outcomes

PROMIS:

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

CAT:

Computerized adaptive measurement system

IRQ:

Interquartile range

HR:

Hazards ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385:117–171. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. doi:10.1002/hep.28431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Udompap P, Kim D, Kim WR. Current and future burden of chronic nonmalignant liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:2031–2041. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tapper EB, Finkelstein D, Mittleman MA, Piatkowski G, Chang M, Lai M. A quality improvement initiative reduces 30-day rate of readmission for patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:753–759. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tapper EB, Halbert B, Mellinger J. Rates of and reasons for hospital readmissions in patients with cirrhosis: a multistate population-based cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:1181–1188.e2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bajaj JS, Reddy KR, Tandon P, et al. The 3-month readmission rate remains unacceptably high in a large north american cohort of patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2016;64:200–208. doi:10.1002/hep.28414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanwal F, Hays RD, Kilbourne AM, Dulai GS, Gralnek IM. Are physician-derived disease severity indices associated with health-related quality of life in patients with end-stage liver disease? Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1726–1732. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30300.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Volk ML, Tocco RS, Bazick J, Rakoski MO, Lok AS. Hospital readmissions among patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:247–252. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berman K, Tandra S, Forssell K, et al. Incidence and predictors of 30-day readmission among patients hospitalized for advanced liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:254–259. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.10.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganesh S, Rogal SS, Yadav D, Humar A, Behari J. Risk factors for frequent readmissions and barriers to transplantation in patients with cirrhosis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55140. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Singal AG, Rahimi RS, Clark C, et al. An automated model using electronic medical record data identifies patients with cirrhosis at high risk for readmission. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1335–1341.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tapper EB, Finkelstein D, Mittleman MA, Piatkowski G, Lai M. Standard assessments of frailty are validated predictors of mortality in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2015;62:584–590. doi:10.1002/hep.27830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Marchesini G, Bianchi G, Amodio P, et al. Factors associated with poor health-related quality of life of patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:170–178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin LM, Sheridan MJ, Younossi ZM. The impact of liver disease on health-related quality of life: a review of the literature. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2002;4:79–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Orr JG, Homer T, Ternent L, et al. Health related quality of life in people with advanced chronic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014;61:1158–1165. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2014.06.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanwal F, Gralnek IM, Hays RD, et al. Health-related quality of life predicts mortality in patients with advanced chronic liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:793–799. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bajaj JS, Wade JB, Gibson DP, et al. The multi-dimensional burden of cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy on patients and caregivers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1646–1653. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bajaj JS, White MB, Unser AB, et al. Cirrhotic patients have good insight into their daily functional impairment despite prior hepatic encephalopathy: comparison with PROMIS norms. Metab Brain Dis. 2016. doi:10.1007/s11011-016-9860-8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sanyal A, Younossi ZM, Bass NM, et al. Randomised clinical trial: rifaximin improves health-related quality of life in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy—a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:853–861. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04808.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Younossi ZM, Guyatt G, Kiwi M, Boparai N, King D. Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut. 1999;45:295–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gralnek IM, Hays RD, Kilbourne A, et al. Development and evaluation of the liver disease quality of life instrument in persons with advanced, chronic liver disease—the LDQOL 1.0. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3552–3565.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kanwal F, Spiegel BM, Hays RD, et al. Prospective validation of the short form liver disease quality of life instrument. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:1088–1101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03817.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Plas SM, Hansen BE, de Boer JB, et al. The liver disease symptom index 2.0; validation of a disease-specific questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1469–1481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsai LH, Lin CM, Chiang SC, Chen CL, Lan SJ, See LC. Symptoms and distress among patients with liver cirrhosis but without hepatocellular carcinoma in taiwan. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2014;37:49–59. doi:10.1097/SGA.0000000000000020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fritz E, Hammer J. Gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with liver cirrhosis are linked to impaired quality of life and psychological distress. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:460–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nardelli S, Pentassuglio I, Pasquale C, et al. Depression, anxiety and alexithymia symptoms are major determinants of health related quality of life (HRQoL) in cirrhotic patients. Metab Brain Dis. 2013;28:239–243. doi:10.1007/s11011-012-9364-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rothrock NE, Hays RD, Spritzer K, Yount SE, Riley W, Cella D. Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1195–1204. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1179–1194. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu H, Cella D, Gershon R, et al. Representativeness of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system internet panel. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1169–1178. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bajaj JS, Thacker LR, Wade JB, et al. PROMIS computerised adaptive tests are dynamic instruments to measure health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:1123–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04842.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahluwalia V, Wade JB, White MB, et al. Liver transplantation significantly improves global functioning and cerebral processing. Liver Transpl. 2016;22:1379–1390. doi:10.1002/lt.24498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mar J, Larranaga I, Arrospide A, Begiristain JM. Impact of disability on different domains of health-related quality of life in the noninstitutionalized general population. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;2:97–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Quinten C, Martinelli F, Coens C, et al. A global analysis of multitrial data investigating quality of life and symptoms as prognostic factors for survival in different tumor sites. Cancer. 2014;120:302–311. doi:10.1002/cncr.28382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saarni SI, Suvisaari J, Sintonen H, et al. Impact of psychiatric disorders on health-related quality of life: general population survey. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:326–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Neff GW, Duncan CW, Schiff ER. The current economic burden of cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011;7:661–671.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thandassery RB, Montano-Loza AJ. Role of nutrition and muscle in cirrhosis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2016;14:257–273. doi:10.1007/s11938-016-0093-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Montagnese S, Turco M, Amodio P. Hepatic encephalopathy and sleepiness: an interesting connection? J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5:S49–S53. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2014.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bajaj JS, Thacker LR, Leszczyszyn D, et al. Effects of obstructive sleep apnea on sleep quality, cognition, and driving performance in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:390–397.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Madan A, Barth KS, Balliet WE, et al. Chronic pain among liver transplant candidates. Prog Transplant. 2012;22:379–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Roth K, Lynn J, Zhong Z, Borum M, Dawson NV. Dying with end stage liver disease with cirrhosis: insights from SUPPORT. study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S122–S130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Acharya C, Betrapally NS, Gillevet PM, et al. Chronic opioid use is associated with altered gut microbiota and predicts readmissions in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:319–331. doi:10.1111/apt.13858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65:1–49. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Potosek J, Curry M, Buss M, Chittenden E. Integration of palliative care in end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation. J Palliat Med. 2014;17:1271–1277. doi:10.1089/jpm.2013.0167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Russ TC, Kivimaki M, Morling JR, Starr JM, Stamatakis E, Batty GD. Association between psychological distress and liver disease mortality: a meta-analysis of individual study participants. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:958–966.e4. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by the NIDDK RO1DK087013 and VA Merit Review Grant CX10076 awarded to Jasmohan S. Bajaj.

Author’s contributions

JSB contributed to study concept and design. LRT, JSB, and KRP analyzed the data. Manuscript preparation was carried out by KRP, JSB, and LRT. JSB, RKS, AJS, RTS, SM, MS, VL, MF, PP, MBW, AF, JBW, and EAG recruited the patients and conducted the study. Manuscript was reviewed by all the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmohan S. Bajaj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 57 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patidar, K.R., Thacker, L.R., Wade, J.B. et al. Symptom Domain Groups of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Tools Independently Predict Hospitalizations and Re-hospitalizations in Cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 62, 1173–1179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4509-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4509-y

Keywords

Navigation