Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 310–320 | Cite as

Developing a Working Model of Cross-Cultural Supervision: A Competence- and Alliance-Based Framework

  • Eunjung Lee
  • David Kealy
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite numerous suggestions to integrate culture, diversity and social justice issues in clinical supervision, empirical studies on cross-cultural supervision indicate limited uptake of such recommendations. We suggest that a comprehensive model of cross-cultural supervision could benefit the field by guiding supervisors in this task. A working model is proposed based on a foundation of the supervisory alliance and a focus on social work practice competence, integrating strategies to promote self- and relational-reflexivity within the supervisory relationship. The model is comprised of four components: component 1: goal setting to contract on cross-cultural integration in supervision; component 2: active listening for cross-cultural markers; component 3: bonding through the supervisor’s self-reflexivity to foster the supervisee’s self-reflexivity; and component 4: working through tasks for cultural integration in supervision by modelling the supervisor’s relational reflexivity in case formulation and treatment to foster the supervisee’s relational-reflexivity.

Keywords

Clinical supervision Reflexivity Cultural humility Alliance Social work competence 

References

  1. Almeida, R., Woods, R., Messineo, T., & Font, R. (1998). The cultural context model: An overview. In M. McGoldrick (Ed.), Revisioning family therapy: Race, culture, and gender in clinical practice (pp. 414–431). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  2. Asakura, K., & Maurer, K. (2018). Attending to social justice in clinical social work: Supervision as a pedagogical space. Clinical Social Work Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0667-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, R., Quiros, L., & Benavidez-Hatzis, J. R. (2017). The intersection of identities in supervision for trauma-informed practice: Challenges and strategies. The Clinical Supervisor, 37(1), 122–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2017.1376299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogo, M., Katz, E., Regehr, C., Logie, C., Mylopoulos, M., & Tufford, L. (2013). Toward understanding meta-competence: An analysis of students’ reflection on their simulated interviews. Social Work Education, 32(2), 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogo, M., & McKnight, K. (2005). Clinical supervision in social work: A review of the research literature. In L. Shulman & A. Safyer (Eds.), Supervision in counseling: Interdisciplinary issues and research. New York, NY: The Haworth Press. (also published in The Clinical Supervisor, 24(1/2), 49–67).Google Scholar
  6. Bordin, E. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000083111007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkard, A. W., Johnson, A. J., Madson, M. B., Pruitt, N. T., Contreras-Tadych, D. A., Kozlowski, J. M., Hess, S. A., & Knox, S. (2006). Supervisor cultural responsiveness and unresponsiveness in cross-cultural supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burkard, A. W., Knox, S., Clarke, R. D., Phelps, D. L., & Inman, A. G. (2014). Supervisors’ experiences of providing difficult feedback in cross-ethnic/racial supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(3), 314–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnham, J. (2006). Relational reflexivity: A tool for socially constructing therapeutic relationships. In C. Flaskas, B. Mason & A. Perlerz (Eds.), The space between. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  11. Burnham, J. (2012). Developments in Social GRRRAAACCEEESSS: Visible–invisible and voiced–unvoiced. In I.-B. Krause (Ed.), Culture and reflexivity in systemic psychotherapy: Mutual perspectives (pp. 139–160). London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  12. Burnham, J., Palma, A., D., & Whitehouse, L. (2008). Learning as a context for differences and differences as a context for learning. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, C. Y., Hays, D. G., & Milliken, T. (2009). Addressing social justice issues in supervision. A call for client and professional advocacy. The Clinical Supervisor, 28, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ChenFeng, J., Castronova, M., & Zimmerman, T. (2017). Safety and social justice in the supervisory relationship. In R. Allan & S. Singh Poulsen (Eds.), Creating cultural safety in couple and family therapy: Supervision and training. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Divac, A., & Heaphy, G. (2005). Space for GRRAACCES: Training for cultural competence in supervision. Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 280–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2012). Getting the most out of clinical training and supervision: A guide for practicum students and interns. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2004). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  18. Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Supervision as pedagogy: Attending to its essential instructional and learning processes. The Clinical Supervisor, 33, 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg, L. S., & Foerster, F. S. (1996). Task analysis exemplified: The process of resolving unfinished business. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hair, H. J. (2014). Supervision conversations about social justice and social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hair, H. J., & O’Donoghue, K. (2009). Culturally relevant, socially just social work supervision: Becoming visible through a social constructionist lens. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18, 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardy, K. V., & Laszloffy, T. A. (1995). The cultural genogram: Key to training culturally competent family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hernández, P. (2003). The cultural context model in supervision: An illustration. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 15(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Horvath, A. O. (2007). The alliance in context: Accomplishments, challenges, and future directions. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(3), 258–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. International Federation of Social Workers (2014). The global definition of social work. Retrieved July 17, 2018 from https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/.
  27. Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawless, J. J., Gale, J. E., & Bacigalupe, G. (2001). The discourse of race and culture in family therapy supervision: A conversation analysis. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(2), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawlor, D. (2013). A transformation programme for children’s social care managers using an interactional and reflective supervision model to develop supervision skills. Journal of Social Work Practice, 27(2), 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, E. (2010). Revisioning cultural competencies in clinical social work practice. Families in Society, 91(3), 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, E., & Horvath, A. O. (2013). Early cultural dialogues in cross-cultural clinical practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 83(2–3), 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, E., & Horvath, A. O. (2014). How a therapist responds cultural versus noncultrual dialogues in cross-cultural clinical practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(2), 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lehrman-Waterman, D., & Ladany, N. (2001). Development and validation of the evaluation process within supervision inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Munson, C. E. (2002). Handbook of clinical social work supervision (3rd ed.). New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Neden, J., & Burnham, J. (2007). Using relational reflexivity as a resource in teaching family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson, M. L., Barnes, K. L., Evans, A. L., & Triggiano, P. J. (2008). Working with conflict in clinical supervision: Wise supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 172–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Donoghue, K., Wong Yuh Ju, P., & Tsui, M. (2018). Constructing an evidence-informed social work supervision model. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 348–358.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1341387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pendry, N. (2012). Race, racism, and systemic supervision. Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rice, L. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (1984). Patterns of change: Intensive analysis of psychotherapy process. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Roper-Hall, A. (1998). Working systemically with older people and their families who have ‘come to grief’. In P. Sutcliffe, G. Tufnell & U. Cornish (Eds.), Working with the dying and bereaved: Systemic approaches to therapeutic work (pp. 177–206). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rousmaniere, T. G., & Ellis, M. V. (2013). Developing the construct and measure of collaborative supervision: The supervisee’s perspective. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(4), 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Samstag, L. W. (1994). Resolving therapeutic alliance rupture: A task analytic investigation. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–255). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Shulman, L. (2010). Interactional supervision (3rd ed.). Washington DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sutter, E., McPherson, R., & Geeseman, R. (2002). Contracting for supervision. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 495–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Totsuka, Y. (2014). ‘Which aspects of social GGRRAAACCEEESSS grab you most?’ The social GGRRAAACCEEESSS exercise for a supervision group to promote therapists’ self-reflexivity. Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsang, A. K. T., & Bogo, M. (1997). Engaging with clients cross culturally: Using research and developing research for effective practice. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 6(3/4), 73–91.Google Scholar
  47. Tufekcioglu, S., & Muran, J. C. (2015). Case formulation and the therapeutic relationship: The role of therapist self-reflection and self-revelation. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Session, 71(5), 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watkins, C. E., & Hook, J. N. (2016). On a culturally humble psychoanalytic supervision perspective: Creating the cultural third. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(3), 487–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young, R. (2004). Cross-cultural supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 32(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social WorkUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of MedicineDetwiller PavilionVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations