Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation and Outcomes of Forensic Housing First Programs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This mixed-method study used administrative data from 68 supportive housing programs and evaluative and qualitative site visit data from a subset of four forensic programs to (a) compare fidelity to the Housing First model and residential client outcomes between forensic and nonforensic programs and (b) investigate whether and how providers working in forensic programs can navigate competing Housing First principles and criminal justice mandates. Quantitative findings suggested that forensic programs were less likely to follow a harm reduction approach to substance use and clients in those programs were more likely to live in congregate settings. Qualitative findings suggested that an interplay of court involvement, limited resources, and risk environments influenced staff decisions regarding housing and treatment. Existing mental health and criminal justice collaborations necessitate adaptation to the Housing First model to accommodate client needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrenger, S. L., & Draine, J. (2013). “You don’t get no help”: The role of community context in effectiveness of evidence-based treatments for people with mental illness leaving prison for high risk environments. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 16, 154–178. doi:10.1080/15487768.2013.789709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. (2002). Mental health recovery paradigm: Implications for social work. Health and Social Work, 27, 86–94. doi:10.1093/hsw/27.2.86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. E., Clifasefi, S. L., Dana, E. A., Andrasik, M. P., Stahl, N., Kirouac, M., et al. (2012). Where harm reduction meets Housing First: Exploring alcohol’s role in a project-based Housing First setting. International Journal of Drug Policy, 23, 111–119. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.07.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Using codes and code manuals: A template organizing style of interpretation. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, P. E., & Drake, R. E. (2006). Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1636–1639. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.11.1636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, R. E., Mercer-McFadden, C., Mueser, K. T., McHugo, G. J., & Bond, G. R. (1998). Review of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 589–608. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmer, T. P., Katz, M. L., Stefancic, A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2013a). Variation in the implementation of California’s full service partnerships for persons with serious mental illness. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2245–2267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmer, T. P., Stefancic, A., Sklar, M., & Tsemberis, S. (2013b). Development and validation of a Housing First fidelity survey. Psychiatric Services, 64, 911–914. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201200500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. A., Steadman, H. J., & Petrila, J. (2002). The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services, 53, 1285–1289. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.53.10.1285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, H. R., Weinberger, L. E., & Gross, B. H. (1999). Community treatment of severely mentally ill offenders under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system: A review. Psychiatric Services, 50, 907–913. doi:10.1176/ps.50.7.907.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, J. S., Russ, A., Cerulli, C., Weisman, R. L., Jacobowitz, D., & Williams, G. C. (2014). Patient experiences of autonomy and coercion while receiving legal leverage in forensic assertive community treatment. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 22, 222–230. doi:10.1097/01.HRP.0000450448.48563.c1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. D., Nijdam-Jones, A., & Team, P. E. E. R. (2013). Perceptions of treatment planning in a forensic mental health hospital: A qualitative, participatory action research study. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12, 42–52. doi:10.1080/14999013.2013.763390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, D. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M. S., & Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed-methods designs in mental health services research: A review. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 255–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1114. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S., & Peterson, J. K. (2011). Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness: Creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 110–126. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9223-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stefancic, A., Hul, L., Gillespie, C., Jost, J., Tsemberis, S., & Jones, H. (2012). Reconciling alternative to incarceration and treatment mandates with a consumer choice Housing First model: A qualitative study of individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12, 382–408. doi:10.1080/15228932.2012.697424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiderington, E., Stanhope, V., & Henwood, B. F. (2013). A qualitative analysis of case managers’ use of harm reduction in practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44, 71–77. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2012.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsemberis, S. (2010). Housing First: The pathways model to end homelessness for people with mental illness and addiction. Center City, MN: Hazelden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsemberis, S., Gulcur, L., & Nakae, M. (2004). Housing First, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 651–656. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.4.651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. B., & Draine, J. (2006). Collaborations between criminal justice and mental health systems for prisoner reentry. Psychiatric Services, 57, 875–878. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.6.875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yanos, P. T. (2007). Beyond “landscapes of despair”: The need for new research on the urban environment, sprawl, and the community integration of persons with severe mental illness. Health & Place, 13, 672–676. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1R01HS019986).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liat S. Kriegel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kriegel, L.S., Henwood, B.F. & Gilmer, T.P. Implementation and Outcomes of Forensic Housing First Programs. Community Ment Health J 52, 46–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9946-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9946-5

Keywords

Navigation