Conservation Genetics

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1231–1241 | Cite as

Importance of landscape features and fire refuges on genetic diversity of Thuya occidentalis L., in boreal fire dominated landscapes

  • Huaitong Xu
  • Francine TremblayEmail author
  • Yves Bergeron
Research Article


The unburned forest remnants of boreal mixed-woods, also known as fire residuals, are essential in providing habitats for disturbance-sensitive species and function as the main source of recolonization of disturbed sites. Forest remnants have been identified as historical or potential reservoirs of genetic diversity in several tree species in fire-prone landscapes. In this study, we investigate the genetic diversity of eastern white cedar (EWC, Thuya occidentalis L.), in forest sites that were affected by different fire regimes. The study area is located in northwestern Quebec, in the Lake Duparquet Research and Teaching Forest (79°10′W–48°30′N). We used 18 polymorphic microsatellite loci to investigate the genetic diversity of eastern white cedar, in forest sites where the fire regime history has been reconstructed to examine the importance of the temporal and spatial continuity of the forest on the genetic diversity of EWC. Three types of landscapes, including; islands within a large lake, fragmented fire refuges (forest patches) and non-fragmented mainland forests were studied. Our results revealed a source-sink dynamic associated with a high level of gene flow. Two of the mainland sites served as the main source of migrants. The level of gene flow in island sites was sufficiently high to counteract the effect of isolation. The fire refuges showed the lowest allelic richness, the highest population differentiation and the fewest number of private alleles. The mean fire-free intervals are much longer in fire-refuges causing environmental isolation through time and higher genetic differentiation. The conservation of large mainland sites should be given careful attention because they maintained high genetic diversity and function as the main source of gene flow. Fire refuges have an intrinsic conservation value in landscapes that are affected by spatially heterogeneous fires because they are important for population persistence through disturbances.


Boreal old growth forest Conservation genetics Fire-prone landscape Fire refuges Forest remnant Fire residuals Gene flow Lake-islands landscape 



This work is part of the PhD thesis of H. X. We would like to acknowledge M. H. Longpré and D. Charron for logistical support and Y. Zhou for assistance in the lab. Special thanks go to the industrial supervisors from the company Tembec. This research was supported by an Industrial Innovation Doctoral Scholarship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), a BMP innovation doctoral scholarship from the Fonds de recherché du Québec- Natures et technologies (FQRNT) and Tembec, and a scholarship from the Forêt d’enseignement et de recherche du lac Duparquet (FERLD) to H. X. This research was also funded by a NSERC strategic grant (STPGP 336871) to F. T.

Supplementary material

10592_2018_1091_MOESM1_ESM.docx (226 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 226 KB)


  1. Antolin MF, Savage LT, Eisen RJ (2006) Landscape features influence genetic structure of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Landsc Ecol 21:867–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asselin H, Fortin MJ, Bergeron Y (2001) Spatial distribution of late-successional coniferous species regeneration following disturbance in southwestern Québec boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 140:9–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacles CF, Burczyk J, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2005) Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution 59:979–990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacles CF, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2006) Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape. Science 311:628. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks SC, Cary GJ, Smith LA, Davies ID, Driscoll DA, Gill AM, Lindenmayer DB, Peakall R (2013) How does ecological disturbance influence genetic diversity? Trends Ecol Evol 28:670–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beaumont MA (1999) Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites. Genetics 153:2013–2029PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Belletti P, Monteleone I, Ferrazzini D (2007) Genetic variability at allozyme markers in sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) populations from northwestern Italy. Can J For Res 37:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergeron Y (1991) The influence of island and mainland lakeshore landscapes on boreal forest fire regimes. Ecology 72:1980–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergeron Y (2000) Species and stand dynamics in the mixed woods of Quebec’s southern boreal forest. Ecology 81:1500–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergeron Y, Dubuc M (1989) Succession in the southern part of the Canadian boreal forest. Vegetatio 79:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergeron Y, Fenton NJ (2012) Boreal forests of eastern Canada revisited: old growth, nonfire disturbances, forest succession, and biodiversity. Botany 90:509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Flannigan M, Kafka V (2004) Fire regimes at the transition between mixedwood and coniferous boreal forest in northwestern Québec. Ecology 85(7):1916–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carcaillet C, Bergeron Y, Richard PJH, Fréchette B, Gauthier S, Prairie YT (2001) Change of fire frequency in the eastern Canadian boreal forests during the Holocene: does vegetation composition or climate trigger the fire regime? J Ecol 89:930–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies ID, Cary GJ, Landguth EL, Lindenmayer DB, Banks SC (2016) Implications of recurrent disturbance for genetic diversity. Ecol Evol 6:1181–1196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Denneler B, Asselin H, Bergeron Y, Bégin Y (2008) Decreased fire frequency and increased water levels affect riparian forest dynamics in southwestern boreal Quebec, Canada. Can J For Res 38:1083–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drobyshev I, Flannigan MD, Bergeron Y, Girardin MP, Suran B (2010) Variation in boreal weather explains differences in fire regimes within a Québec south-eastern boreal forest landscape. Int J Wildland Fire 19:1073–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Earl D, Vonholdt B (2012) structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenton NJ, Bergeron Y (2013) Stochastic processes dominate during boreal bryophyte community assembly. Ecology 94:1993–2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Foll M, Gaggiotti OE (2006) Identifying the environmental factors that determine the genetic structure of populations. Genetics 174:875–891CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Gandhi KJK, Spence JR, Langor DW, Morgantini LE (2001) Fire residuals as habitat reserves for epigaeic beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae. and Staphylinidae). Biol Conserv 102:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gasaway WC, DuBois SD (1985) Initial response of moose, Alces alces, to a wildfire in Interior Alaska. Can Field Nat 99:135–140Google Scholar
  23. Gauthier S, Simon JP, Bergeron Y (1992) Genetic structure and variability in jack pine populations: effects of insularity. Can J For Res 22:1958–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gauthier S, Vaillancourt MA, Leduc A, De Grandpré L, Kneeshaw D, Morin H, Drapeau P, Bergeron Y (2009) Ecosystem management in the boreal forest. Presses de l’Université du Québec, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  25. Girardin MP, Mudelsee M (2008) Past and future changes in Canadian boreal wildfire activity. Ecol Appl 18:391–406. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995)
  27. Hannon SJ, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Corridors may not improve the conservation value of small reserves for most Boreal Birds. Ecol Appl 12:1457–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoebee S, Menn C, Rotach P, Finkeldey R, Holderegger R (2006) Spatial genetic structure of Sorbus torminalis: the extent of clonal reproduction in natural stands of a rare tree species with a scattered distribution. For Ecol Manag 226:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holderegger R, Buehler D, Gugerli F, Manel S (2010) Landscape genetics of plants. Trends Plant Sci 15:675–683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keeton WS (2000) Occurrence and reproductive role of remnant old-growth trees in mature Douglas-fir forests, southern Washington, Cascade Range. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kremer A, Ronce O, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Guillaume F, Bohrer JR, Nathan G, Bridle R, Gomulkiewicz R, Klein EK, Ritland R, Kuparinen A, Gerber S, Schueler S (2012) Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. Ecol Lett 15:378–392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Lesser MR, Jackson ST (2013) Contributions of long-distance dispersal to population growth in colonising Pinus ponderosa populations. Ecol Lett 16:380–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindenmayer D, Hobbs RJ, Montague-Drake R et al (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol Lett 11: 78–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lind-Riehl J, Gailing O (2015) Fine-scale spatial genetic structure of two red oak species, Quercus rubra and Quercus ellipsoidalis. Plant Syst Evol 301:1601–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1998) Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conserv Biol 12:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mosseler A, Major JE, Rajora OP (2003) Old-growth red spruce forests as reservoirs of genetic diversity and reproductive fitness. Theor Appl Genet 106:931–937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nathan R, Horvitz N, He Y, Kuparinen A, Schurr FM, Katul GG (2011) Spread of North American wind-dispersed trees in future environments. Ecol Lett 14:211–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Oddou-Muratorio S, Demesure-Musch B, Pelissier R, Gouyon PH (2004) Impacts of gene flow and logging history on the local genetic structure of a scattered tree species, Sorbus torminalis L. Crantz. Mol Ecol 13:3689–3702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ouarmim S, Asselin H, Hely C, Bergeron Y, Ali AA (2014) Long-term dynamics of fire refuges in boreal mixedwood forests. J Quat Sci 29:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Premoli AC, Kitzberger T (2005) Regeneration mode affects spatial genetic structure of Nothofagus dombeyi forests. Mol Ecol 14:2319–2329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Premoli AC, Steinke L (2008) Genetics of sprouting: effects of long-term persistence in fire-prone ecosystems. Mol Ecol 17:3827–3835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Raftery AE, Lewis SM (1995) The number of iterations, convergence diagnostics and generic Metropolis algorithms. In: Gilks WR, Spiegel-Halter DJ, Richardson S (eds) Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP ’ 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Res 8:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Knürrr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 38:595–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shohami D, Nathan R (2014) Fire-induced population reduction and landscape opening increases gene flow via pollen dispersal in Pinus halepensis. Mol Ecol 23:70–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Spear SF, Holderegger R, Waits LP (2010) Landscape genetics: where are we now? Mol Ecol 19:3496–3514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Storz JF, Beaumont MA (2002) Testing for genetic evidence of population expansion and contraction: an empirical analysis of microsatellite DNA variation using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Evolution 56:154–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH, Hargrove WW (1997) Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park. Ecol Monogr 67:411–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner MG, Romme WH, Tinker DB (2003) Surprises and lessons from the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Front Ecol Environ 1:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Uchiyama K, Goto S, Tsuda Y, Takahashi Y, Ide Y (2006) Genetic diversity and genetic structure of adult and buried seed populations of Betula maximowicziana in mixed and post-fire stands. Forest Ecol Manag 237:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weir BS, Clark Cockerham C (1984) Estimating f-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Widmer A, Lexer C (2001) Glacial refugia: sanctuaries for allelic richness, but not for gene diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 16:267–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilkin KM, Ackerly DD, Stephens SL (2016) Climate change refugia, fire ecology and management. Forests 7:77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright SJ, Trakhtenbrot AG, Bohrer G, Detto M, Katul GG, Horvitz N, Muller-Landau HC, Landau FA, Nathan R (2008) Understanding strategies for seed dispersal by wind under contrasting atmospheric conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19084–19089CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu H, Tremblay F, Bergeron Y (2013) Development and multiplexed amplification of SSR Markers for Thuja occidentalis (Cupressaceae) using shotgun pyrosequencing. Appl Plant Sci 1:1200427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huaitong Xu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Francine Tremblay
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yves Bergeron
    • 1
  1. 1.Chaire Industrielle CRSNG-UQAT-UQAM en Aménagement Forestier Durable, Institut de Recherche sur les ForêtsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueRouyn-NorandaCanada
  2. 2.Research Center for Forest Resources and Environment of GuizhouGuiyangChina
  3. 3.College of ForestryGuizhou UniversityGuiyangChina

Personalised recommendations