Climatic Change

, Volume 133, Issue 3, pp 375–384 | Cite as

Climate justice in a carbon budget

Article

Abstract

The fact of a carbon budget given commitment to limiting global-mean temperature increase to below 2 °C warming relative to pre-industrial levels makes CO2 emissions a scarce resource. This fact has significant consequences for the ethics of climate change. The paper highlights some of these consequences with respect to (a) applying principles of distributive justice to the allocation of rights to emissions and the costs of mitigation and adaptation, (b) compensation for the harms and risks of climate change, (c) radical new ideas about a place for criminal justice in tackling climate change, and (d) catastrophe ethics.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Reto Knutti and Joeri Rogelj for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Comments made by Dominic Roser and two anonymous referees for the journal also greatly helped to improve the paper.

References

  1. Adam D (2011) Climate change in court. Nat Clim Chang 1:127–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman F (2008) Can we afford the future? The economics of a warming world. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Broome J (1994) Discounting the future. Philos Public Aff 23(2):128–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broome J (2012) Climate matters. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Caney S (2012) Just emissions. Philos Public Aff 40(4):255–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman J (1992) Risks and wrongs. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowen T, Parfit D (1992) Against the social discount rate. In: Laslett P, Fishkin JS (eds) Justice between age groups and generations. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  8. Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The ‘Anthropocene’. Glob Chang Newslett 41:17–18Google Scholar
  9. Duff RA (2009) Answering for crime: responsibility and liability in the criminal law. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Duff RA (2010) Authority and responsibility in international criminal law. In: Besson S, Tasioulas J (eds) The philosophy of international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Farber DA (2008) The case for climate compensation: doing justice to climate change victims in a complex world. Utah Law Rev 2:1–36Google Scholar
  12. Gardiner SM (2011) A perfect moral storm: the ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunter D, Salzman J (2007) Negligence in the air: the duty of care in climate change litigation. Univ Pa Law Rev 155(6):1741–1794Google Scholar
  14. Hyams K, Fawcett T (2013) The ethics of carbon offsetting. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 4(2):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jamieson D (2005) Adaptation, mitigation, and justice. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Howarth RB (eds) Perspectives on climate change: science, economics, politics, ethics. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Jamieson D (2014) Reason in a dark time: Why the struggle against climate change failed, and what it means for our future. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luban D (2004) A theory of crimes against humanity. Yale J Int Law 29:85–167Google Scholar
  18. McKinnon C (2011) Climate change and future justice: precaution, compensation and triage. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogelj J, McCollum DL, O’Neill BC, Riahi K (2013) 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2°C. Nat Clim Chang 3:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Shue H (1980) Basic rights: subsistence, affluence and U.S. Foreign policy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. Shue H (1993) Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy 15(1):39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shue H (1995) Avoidable necessity: global warming, international fairness, and alternative energy. In: Shapiro I, Wagner DeCew J (eds) Theory and practice: NOMOS XXXVII. NYU Press, New York, pp 239–264Google Scholar
  26. Shue H (2013) Climate hope: implementing the exit strategy. Chic J Int Law 13(2):381–402Google Scholar
  27. Singer P (2002) One world: the ethics of globalisation. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  28. Vanderheiden S (2008) Atmospheric justice: a political theory of climate change. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics and International RelationsUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  2. 2.Institute of Climate Change and Public PolicyNanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST)Pukou DistrictChina

Personalised recommendations