Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices
- 3.7k Downloads
A significant body of research concludes that stable beliefs of perceived consumer effectiveness lead to sustainable consumption choices. Consumers who believe that their decisions can significantly affect environmental and social issues are more likely to behave sustainably. Little is known, however, about how perceived consumer effectiveness can be increased. We find that feelings of guilt and pride, activated by a single consumption episode, can regulate sustainable consumption by affecting consumers’ general perception of effectiveness. This paper demonstrates the impact that guilt and pride have on perceived consumer effectiveness and shows how this effect rests on the ability of these emotions to influence perceptions of agency. After experiencing guilt or pride, consumers see themselves as the cause of relevant sustainability outcomes. The process of causal attribution associated with these emotions influences consumers’ use of neutralization techniques. Through the reduction in consumers’ ability to neutralize their sense of personal responsibility, guilt and pride positively influence perceived consumer effectiveness. The inability to rationalize-away their personal responsibility, persuades consumers that they affect sustainability outcomes through their decisions. The research advances our understanding of sustainable consumption and identifies a new avenue for the regulation of individual consumer behavior that has significant implications for the development of sustainable marketing initiatives.
KeywordsEthical consumption Sustainable consumption Guilt Pride Perceived consumer effectiveness Self-efficacy
Perceived consumer effectiveness
Perceived behavioral control
Internal locus of control
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers, & M. Sabido (Eds.), Entertainment—education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 75–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Berger, I., & Corbin, R. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviours. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 79–89.Google Scholar
- Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139–158.Google Scholar
- Cotte, J., & Trudel, R. (2009). Socially conscious consumerism—a systematic review of the body of knowledge. Network for Business Sustainability Knowledge Project Series. Accessed at: http://nbs.net/topic/consumer/consumerism/ on 4 January 2013.
- Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102–117.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, P. (2003). Evolution, social roles, and the differences in shame and guilt. Social Research, 70(4), 1205–1230.Google Scholar
- Granzin, K., & Olsen, J. (1991). Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment—a focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
- Gregory-Smith D., Smith, A., & Winklhofer, H. (2013) Emotions and dissonance in ‘ethical’ consumption choices. Journal of Marketing Management. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2013.796320.
- Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2010). Can I make a difference ? The role of general and domain-specific self-efficacy in sustainable consumption decisions. Umweltpsychologie, 14(2), 46–74.Google Scholar
- Hesz, A., & Neophytou, B. (2010). Guilt trip—from fear to guilt on the green bandwagon. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Jackson, T. (2006). The Earthscan reader in sustainable consumption. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Kappas, A. (2006). Appraisals are direct, immediate, intuitive, and unwitting…and some are reflective… Cognition & Emotion, 20(7), 952–975.Google Scholar
- Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 592–599.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), iiv–8.Google Scholar
- Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0, www.smartpls.de.
- Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social Psychophysiology (pp. 153–176). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schwepker, C. H., Jr, & Cornwell, T. B. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10(2), 77–101.Google Scholar
- Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Tangney, J. P., & Tracy, J. L. (2012). The self-conscious emotions. In M. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity (2nd ed., pp. 446–480). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding household garbage reduction behavior: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 14(2), 192–204.Google Scholar
- Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2008). Self-regulation—goals, consumption, and choices. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 349–367). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar