Quality at the Point of Service: Profiles of Practice in After-School Settings

  • Charles Smith
  • Stephen C. Peck
  • Anne-Sophie Denault
  • Juliane Blazevski
  • Tom Akiva
Original Paper

Abstract

A unique observational data set was used to explore quality at the point of service in after-school programs. Staff practices in after-school settings were represented on a series of unidimensional scales closely indexed to staff behavior. In order to account for heterogeneity of staff performances, pattern-centered methods were used to construct profiles of common staff practices. Results revealed six pedagogy profiles that were classified in terms of three broad types of performances delivered by after-school staff: (1) positive youth development, (2) staff-centered, and (3) low-quality. Staff membership in these profiles was not related to youth-staff ratio. However, results revealed significant differences between the profiles on the content of the offering and the age of youth in the setting.

Keywords

After school Youth development Cluster analysis Quality Quality assessment 

References

  1. Bartko, T. W., & Eccles, J. S. (2003). Adolescent participation in structured and unstructured activities: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergman, L. R., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2002). SLEIPNER: A statistical package for pattern-oriented analyses. Version 2.1. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Psychology. (Manual).Google Scholar
  3. Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Blazevski, J., & Smith, C. (2007). Inter-rater reliability on the youth program quality assessment. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Blyth, D. (2006). Toward a new paradigm for youth development. New Directions for Youth Development: Rethinking Programs for Youth in the Middle Years, 112, 25–44.Google Scholar
  6. Bodilly, S., & Beckett, M. K. (2005). Making out-of-school-time matter: Evidence for an action agenda. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
  7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span (pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cairns, R. B., & Rodkin, P. C. (1998). Phenomena regained: From configurations to pathways. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual: Essays in honor of Marian Radke-Yarrow (pp. 245–264). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Durlak, J. A., & Weisberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.Google Scholar
  12. Early, D. M., Maxwell, K. L., Burchinal, M., Bender, R. H., Ebanks, C., Henry, G. T., et al. (2007). Teacher education, classroom quality, and young children’s academic skills: Results from seven studies of preschool programs. Child Development, 78, 558–580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Features of positive developmental settings. Community programs to promote youth development (pp. 86–118). Washington, DC: National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth, Board on Children, Youth, and Families. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. M. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3, pp. 139–186). NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eccles, J. S., Early, D., Fraser, K., Belansky, E., & McCarthy, K. (1997). The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher, A. C., Nickerson, P., & Wright, K. L. (2003). Structured leisure activities in middle childhood: Links to well-being. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granger, R., Durlak, J. A., Yohalem, N., & Reisner, E. (2007). Improving after-school program quality. Unpublished manuscript, W. T. Grant Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949–967.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen, D. M., Larson, R. W., & Dworkin, J. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Intercultural Center for Research in Education, National Institute on Out-of-School Time. (2005). Pathways to success for youth: What counts in after-school. Arlington, MA: United Way of Massachusetts Bay.Google Scholar
  21. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  22. Karoly, L. A., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Zellman, G. L., Perlman, M., & Fernyhough, L. (2008). Prepared to learn: The nature and quality of early care and education for preschool-age children in California. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
  23. Larson, R. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LoCasale-Crouch, J., Konold, T., Pianta, R., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, D. M., et al. (2007). Observed classroom quality profiles in state-funded pre-kindergarten programs and associations with teacher, program, and classroom characteristics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models and research strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101, 3–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahoney, J. (2000). School extracurricular activity participation as a moderator in the development of antisocial patterns. Child Development, 71, 502–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Lord, H. (2005). Organized activities as developmental contexts for children and adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 3–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  31. Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., et al. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79, 732–749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. NICHD Early Childhood Research Network. (2005). A day in third grade: A large-scale study of classroom quality, teacher, and student behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 105, 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peck, S. C. (2007). TEMPEST in a gallimaufry: Applying multilevel systems theory to person-in-context research. Journal of Personality, 75, 1127–1156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Peck, S. C., Roeser, R. W., Zarrett, N., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Exploring the roles of extracurricular activity quantity and quality in the educational resilience of vulnerable adolescents: Variable- and pattern-centered approaches. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 135–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., et al. (2000). The children of the cost, quality, and outcomes study go to school: Technical report. Chapel Hill: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.Google Scholar
  38. Pianta, R. C. (2008). Developmental science and education: The NICHD study of early child care and youth development—Findings from elementary school. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  39. Pianta, R. C., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, D., Clifford, R., Early, D., et al. (2005). Features of pre-kindergarten programs, classrooms and teachers: Do they predict observed classroom quality and child–teacher interactions? Applied Developmental Science, 9, 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Russell, C. A., & Reisner, E. R. (2005). Supporting social and cognitive growth among disadvantaged middle-grades students in TASC after-school projects. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.Google Scholar
  41. Shanahan, M. J., & Flaherty, B. P. (2001). Dynamic development of time use in adolescence. Child Development, 72, 385–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, C., & Hohmann, C. (2005). Full findings from the youth PQA validation study. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, C., Akiva, T., & Henry, B. (2006). Quality in the out-of-school time sector: Insights from the Youth PQA Validation Study. In Paper presented at the Society for Research on Adolescence biennial meeting. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, C., Akiva, T., Blazevski, J., & Pelle, L. (2008). Final report on the Palm Beach quality improvement system pilot: Model implementation and program quality improvement in 38 after-school programs. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  45. Tseng, V., & Seidman, E. (2007). A systems framework for understanding social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 217–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. von Eye, A., & Bogat, G. A. (2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 390–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walker, J. A., Marczak, M., Blythe, D. A., & Borden, L. (2005). Designing youth development programs: Toward a theory of developmental intentionality. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 399–418). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Weikart, D. P., Epstein, A. S., Schweinhart, L., & Bond, J. T. (1978). The Ypsilanti preschool curriculum demonstration project: Preschool years and longitudinal results. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  49. Yohalem, N., & Wilson-Ahlstrom, A. (2007). Measuring youth program quality: A guide to assessment tools. Washington, DC: Forum for Youth Investment.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Smith
    • 1
  • Stephen C. Peck
    • 2
  • Anne-Sophie Denault
    • 2
  • Juliane Blazevski
    • 1
  • Tom Akiva
    • 2
  1. 1.Weikart Center for Youth Program QualityYpsilantiUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations