Abstract
Sex Positive![+] is a two-arm, video-based web intervention aimed at reducing condomless anal sex (CAS) with partners of known and unknown serostatus that was delivered online to a racially and ethnically diverse sample of 830 gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men living with HIV. Men in each arm received 6 weekly videos after completing a baseline assessment and 4 weekly booster videos following a 6-month assessment. Follow-up assessments were conducted every 3 months for 1 year. At 3-month follow-up, men in the intervention arm reported significantly reduced risk of having unknown serodiscordant CAS partners than men in the control arm (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.92), partially supporting study hypotheses. Aside from this finding, similar reductions in sexual risk behaviors were observed in both arms over the study period. There is much to be learned about video-based web interventions in terms of methodological development and intervention delivery, including frequency and duration of intervention components.
Resumen
Sex Positive! [+] es una intervención vía web de dos brazos basado en videos diseñados para reducir el sexo anal sin condón (SASC) con parejas de estado serológico conocido y desconocido. Los videos se distribuyeron vía Internet a una muestra racial y étnicamente diversa de 830 hombres homosexuales, bisexuales y otros hombres que tienen sexo con hombres que viven con VIH. Después de completar una evaluación basal, semanalmente se presentó un video a los hombres de cada brazo durante 6 semanas. Comenzando en el sexto mes, un video de refuerzo se presentó semanalmente durante 4 semanas. Las evaluaciones de seguimiento se realizaron cada tres meses durante un año. A los 3 meses de seguimiento, los hombres en el brazo de intervención reportaron una reducción significativa en el riesgo de tener SASC con parejas de estado serológico desconocido comparados con hombres en el brazo de control (RR = 0,60; IC del 95%: 0,39-0,92), lo cual apoya parcialmente la hipótesis del estudio. Además de este hallazgo, se observaron reducciones similares en las conductas de riesgo sexual en ambos brazos durante el período de estudio. Aún hay mucho que aprender acerca de las intervenciones con videos administradas por medio del Internet, específicamente en términos de desarrollo metodológico y modos de implementación, incluyendo la frecuencia y la duración de los componentes de la intervención.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report, 2017 November 2018.
Singh S, Mitsch A, Wu B. HIV care outcomes among men who have sex with men with diagnosed HIV infection—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(37):969–74.
Gant Z, Bradley H, Hu X, et al. Hispanics or Latinos living with diagnosed HIV: progress along the continuum of HIV care—United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(40):886–90.
Whiteside YO, Cohen SM, Bradley H, et al. Progress along the continuum of HIV care among blacks with diagnosed HIV—United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(5):85–9.
Hall HI, Holtgrave DR, Tang T, Rhodes P. HIV transmission in the United States: considerations of viral load, risk behavior, and health disparities. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(5):1632–6.
Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Bolan RK, et al. Sex on demand: geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(7):567–72.
Rendina HJ, Jimenez RH, Grov C, Ventuneac A, Parsons JT. Patterns of lifetime and recent HIV testing among men who have sex with men in New York city who use grindr. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(1):41–9.
Rosser BR, Oakes JM, Konstan J, et al. Reducing HIV risk behavior of men who have sex with men through persuasive computing: results of the Men’s INTernet Study-II. AIDS. 2010;24(13):2099–107.
Wolitski RJ, Gomez CA, Parsons JT. Effects of a peer-led behavioral intervention to reduce HIV transmission and promote serostatus disclosure among HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 1):S99–109.
Grov C, Breslow AS, Newcomb ME, Rosenberger JG, Bauermeister JA. Gay and bisexual men’s use of the Internet: research from the 1990s through 2013. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2014;51(4):390–409.
Krishnan A, Ferro EG, Weikum D, et al. Communication technology use and mHealth acceptance among HIV-infected men who have sex with men in Peru: implications for HIV prevention and treatment. AIDS Care. 2015;27(3):273–82.
Seidenberg AB, Jo CL, Ribisl KM, et al. A national study of social media, television, radio, and internet usage of adults by sexual orientation and smoking status: implications for campaign design. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(4):E450.
McKirnan DJ, Tolou-Shams M, Courtenay-Quirk C. The Treatment Advocacy Program: a randomized controlled trial of a peer-led safer sex intervention for HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(6):952–63.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Complete Listing of Risk Reduction Evidence-based Behavioral Interventions. 2019; http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/research/interventionresearch/compendium/rr/complete.html. Accessed 13 March 2019.
Fernandez MI, Hosek SG, Hotton AL, et al. A randomized Controlled trial of POWER: an internet-based HIV prevention intervention for black bisexual men. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(9):1951–60.
Bransford J, Sherwood R, Hasselbring T, Kinzer C, Williams S. Anchored instruction: why we need it and how technology can help. In: Nix D, Spiro R, editors. Cognition, education, and multimedia: exploring ideas in high technology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1990. p. 115–41.
Collins A. Design issues for learning environments. In: Vosniadou S, De Corte E, Glaser R, Mandl H, editors. International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996.
Jonassen D, Howland J, Moore J, Marra R. Learning to solve problems with technology: a constructivist perspective. 2nd ed. Columbus: Merrill/Prentice-Hall; 2003.
Rivera AV, DeCuir J, Crawford ND, Amesty S, Harripersaud K, Lewis CF. Factors associated with HIV stigma and the impact of a nonrandomized multi-component video aimed at reducing HIV stigma among a high-risk population in New York City. AIDS Care. 2015;27(6):772–6.
Tuong W, Larsen ER, Armstrong AW. Videos to influence: a systematic review of effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors. J Behav Med. 2014;37(2):218–33.
Calderon Y, Cowan E, Leu CS, et al. A human immunodeficiency virus posttest video to increase condom use among adolescent emergency department patients. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53(1):79–84.
Warner L, Klausner JD, Rietmeijer CA, et al. Effect of a brief video intervention on incident infection among patients attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. PLoS Med. 2008;5(6):e135.
Blas MM, Alva IE, Carcamo CP, et al. Effect of an online video-based intervention to increase HIV testing in men who have sex with men in Peru. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(5):e10448.
Chiasson MA, Shaw FS, Humberstone M, Hirshfield S, Hartel D. Increased HIV disclosure three months after an online video intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Care. 2009;21(9):1081–9.
Hirshfield S, Chiasson MA, Joseph H, et al. An online randomized controlled trial evaluating HIV prevention digital media interventions for men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46252.
Schank R, Abelson R. Knowledge and memory: the real story. In: Wyer R, editor. Advances in social cognition, vol. 8. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1995. p. 1–85.
Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.
Brookfield S. Developing critical thinkers: challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
Freijy T, Kothe EJ. Dissonance-based interventions for health behaviour change: a systematic review. Br J Health Psychol. 2013;18(2):310–37.
Schank R, Berman T. The pervasive role of stories in knowledge and action. In: Green M, Strange JJ, Brock TC, editors. Narrative impact: social and cognitive foundations. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002. p. 287–313.
Schank R. Dynamic memory: a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
Bandura A. Psychological modeling: conflicting theories. New York: Lieber-Atherton; 1974.
Bandura A. Analysis of modeling processes, vol. 1-62. New York: Lieber-Atherton; 1974.
Chiasson MA. Ask me, tell me. New York: Public Health Solutions; 2011.
Fred says. Chicago: Love Lion Studio; 2013.
Hirshfield S, Downing MJ Jr, Parsons JT, et al. Developing a video-based eHealth intervention for HIV-positive gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(2):e125.
SurveyGizmo [computer program]. Boulder, CO: Widgix LLC dba SurveyGizmo; 2019.
Wilson IB, Lee Y, Michaud J, Fowler FJ Jr, Rogers WH. Validation of a new three-item self-report measure for medication adherence. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(11):2700–8.
Smith A. Technology trends among people of color [Report]. Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2010.
PewInternet.org. Spring tracking survey. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2011; http://pewinternet.org/Trend-Data/Whos-Online.aspx. Accessed 8 November 2011.
Smith A. Mobile access report 2010. Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2010.
Sullivan PS, Khosropour CM, Luisi N, et al. Bias in online recruitment and retention of racial and ethnic minority men who have sex with men. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2):e38.
Bezabhe WM, Chalmers L, Bereznicki LR, Peterson GM. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy and virologic failure: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(15):e3361.
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 [computer program]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2013.
Kline RB. Beyond significance testing: statistics reform in the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2013.
Horvath KJ, Oakes JM, Rosser BS, et al. Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online peer-to-peer social support ART adherence intervention. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2031–44.
Mustanski B, Garofalo R, Monahan C, Gratzer B, Andrews R. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an online HIV prevention program for diverse young men who have sex with men: the keep it up! intervention. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(9):2999–3012.
Bauermeister JA, Pingel ES, Jadwin-Cakmak L, et al. Acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a tailored online HIV/STI testing intervention for young men who have sex with men: the Get Connected! program. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(10):1860–74.
Chen LF, Vander Weg MW, Hofmann DA, Reisinger HS. The Hawthorne effect in infection prevention and epidemiology. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36(12):1444–50.
Morton V, Torgerson DJ. Regression to the mean: treatment effect without the intervention. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(1):59–65.
Jones R, Hoover DR, Lacroix LJ. A randomized controlled trial of soap opera videos streamed to smartphones to reduce risk of sexually transmitted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in young urban African American women. Nurs Outlook. 2013;61(4):205–15.
Koblin BA, Bonner S, Powell B, et al. A randomized trial of a behavioral intervention for black MSM: the DiSH study. AIDS. 2012;26(4):483–8.
Mansergh G, Koblin BA, McKirnan DJ, et al. An intervention to reduce HIV risk behavior of substance-using men who have sex with men: a two-group randomized trial with a nonrandomized third group. PLoS Med. 2010;7(8):e1000329.
Castor D, Pilowsky DJ, Hadden B, et al. Sexual risk reduction among non-injection drug users: report of a randomized controlled trial. AIDS Care. 2010;22(1):62–70.
Padian NS, McCoy SI, Balkus JE, Wasserheit JN. Weighing the gold in the gold standard: challenges in HIV prevention research. AIDS. 2010;24(5):621–35.
Du Bois SN, Johnson SE, Mustanski B. Examining racial and ethnic minority differences among YMSM during recruitment for an online HIV prevention intervention study. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1430–5.
Huang E, Marlin RW, Young SD, Medline A, Klausner JD. Using grindr, a smartphone social-networking application, to increase HIV self-testing among black and Latino men who have sex with men in Los Angeles, 2014. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(4):341–50.
Young SD, Holloway I, Jaganath D, Rice E, Westmoreland D, Coates T. Project HOPE: online social network changes in an HIV prevention randomized controlled trial for African American and Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(9):1707–12.
Noar SM, Willoughby JF. eHealth interventions for HIV prevention. AIDS Care. 2012;24(8):945–52.
Bazazi AR, Wickersham JA, Wegman MP, et al. Design and implementation of a factorial randomized controlled trial of methadone maintenance therapy and an evidence-based behavioral intervention for incarcerated people living with HIV and opioid dependence in Malaysia. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017;59:1–12.
De P, Downing MJ Jr, Hirshfield S. Cost analysis of implementing a video-based eHealth intervention for HIV-positive gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2018;30(4):301–8.
Noar SM. Computer technology-based interventions in HIV prevention: state of the evidence and future directions for research. AIDS Care. 2011;23(5):525–33.
Sullivan PS, Jones J, Kishore N, Stephenson R. The roles of technology in primary HIV prevention for men who have sex with men. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12(4):481–8.
Simoni JM, Kutner BA, Horvath KJ. Opportunities and challenges of digital technology for hiv treatment and prevention. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12(4):437–40.
Funding
This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH100973, PI: Hirshfield). A Certificate of Confidentiality was also obtained from the National Institute of Mental Health to provide additional privacy protections for participants enrolled in this study (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02023580).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirshfield, S., Downing, M.J., Chiasson, M.A. et al. Evaluation of Sex Positive! A Video eHealth Intervention for Men Living with HIV. AIDS Behav 23, 3103–3118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02498-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02498-5