Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Site response analysis for the seismic improvement of a historical and monumental building: the case study of Augusta Hangar

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eastern Sicily is very rich of historical buildings, but at the same time is one of the most seismically active areas of Italy. In particular, the city of Augusta was damaged by the January 11, 1693 Val di Noto Earthquake, as well as some others Sicilian cities. Afterwards, the strongest earthquake, about 300 years later, was the Sicilian Earthquake of December 13, 1990, with an epicenter close to Augusta and maximum intensity of VII–VIII MCS. In order to study the geotechnical dynamic characteristics of the foundation soil of the Augusta Hangar, in situ investigations and laboratory tests have been carried out. Among in situ investigations, borings, standard penetration tests (SPT), field vane tests (FVT), Ménard pressure meter tests (MPT), down-hole tests (DHT) have been carried out. Among laboratory tests oedometer tests, direct shear tests (DST), consolidated drained triaxial tests (CDTXT), n. 6 undrained triaxial tests (UTXT), cyclic loading torsional shear tests (CLTST), resonant column tests (RCT) have been carried out. Special attention has been devoted to the variation of the Young modulus non-linearity, shear modulus G, and damping ratio D by cyclic loading triaxial tests and resonant column tests. This paper tries to summarize this information in a comprehensive way in order to provide a representative geotechnical model of the site where an important historical building is located. Processing of all these data also allowed the ground response analysis at the surface, in terms of time history and response spectra, using as input in the linear-equivalent codes EERA, STRATA, and DEEPSOIL both synthetic seismograms and recorded accelerograms. The results of the ground response analyses represent useful tools for the safeguard of historical buildings and have been used for the planning of the seismic improvement interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45
Fig. 46
Fig. 47
Fig. 48
Fig. 49

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auld B (1977) Cross-hole and down-hole Vs by mechanical impulse. J GED ASCE 103(GT12):1381–1398

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardet JP, Tobita T (2001) NERA: nonlinear earthquake site response analysis of layered soil deposits. University of California, Oakland http://geoinfo.usc.edu/gees

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardet JP, Ichii K, Lin CH (2000) EERA—a computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits. University of Southern California, Dept of Civil Eng, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianca M, Monaco C, Tortorici L, Cernobori L (1999) Quaternary normal faulting in southeastern Sicily (Italy): a seismic source for the 1693 large earthquake. Int J Geophys 139:370–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone S (1985) I Depositi Pleistocenici del Settore Nord-Orientale Ibleo tra Agnone e Melilli (Sicilia SE): Relazione tra Facies e Lineamenti Strutturali. Bull Italian Geol Soc 104

  • Caruso S, Ferraro A, Grasso S, Massimino MR (2016) Site response analysis in Eastern sicily based on direct and indirect Vs measurements. Proceedings of the 1st IMEKO TC4 International Workshop on Metrology for Geotechnics, Benevento, 17–18 March 2016, pp 115–120

  • Castelli F, Lentini V (2013) Landsliding events triggered by rainfalls in the Enna area (South Italy). Proc. of the Second World Landslide Forum, Roma, 3–7 October 2011, Springer eds., Volume 2, pp39–47

  • Castelli F, Lentini V (2016) Monitoring of full scale diaphragm wall for a deep excavation. Proc. of 1st IMEKO TC-4 International Workshop on Metrology for Geotechnics. Benevento, Italy, March 17–18, 2016, pp 103–108. ISBN 978–92–990075-0-1

  • Castelli F, Lentini V, Maugeri M (2008a) One-dimensional seismic analysis of a solid-waste landfill. Proceedings of the 2008 Seismic Engineering International Conference Commemorating the 1908 Messina and Reggio Calabria Earthquake MERCEA’08, Reggio Calabria and Messina, 8–11 July 2008, pp 240–251. Vol. 1, pp 509–516

  • Castelli F, Maugeri M, Mylonakis G (2008b) Numerical analysis of kinematic soil-pile interaction. Proc. MERCEA 2008, Seismic Engineering International Conference Commemorating the 1908 Messina and Reggio Calabria Earthquake, Reggio Calabria and Messina, July 8–11, Vol.1, pp618–625

  • Castelli F, Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Lentini V (2016a) Seismic microzoning from synthetic ground motion earthquake scenarios parameters: the case study of the City of Catania (Italy). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 88(2016):307–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli F, Cavallaro A, Ferraro A, Grasso S, Lentini V (2016b) A seismic geotechnical hazard study in the Ancient City of Noto (Italy). Proceedings of the 6th Italian Conference of Researchers in Geotechnical Engineering (CNRIG), Bologna, 22–23 September 2016, Procedia Engineering (2016), Vol. 158, pp 535–540

  • Cavallaro A, Maugeri M, Lo Presti DCF, Pallara O (1999) Characterising shear modulus and damping from in situ and laboratory tests for the seismic area of Catania. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Pre-failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Torino, 28–30 September 1999, pp 51–58

  • Cavallaro A, Massimino MR, Maugeri M (2003) Noto cathedral: soil and foundation investigation. Constr Build Mater 17(2003):533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Maugeri M (2008) Site response analysis for Tito Scalo Area (PZ) in the Basilicata Region, Italy. Proceedings of the 4th Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference, Sacramento, 18–22 May 2008, ASCE - Geotechnical Special Publication (GSP) N°.181

  • Cavallaro A, Ferraro A, Grasso S, Maugeri M (2012) Topographic effects of the Monte Po Hill in Catania. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 43:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Ferraro A (2016) A geotechnical engineering study for the safeguard, Restoration and Strengthening of Historical Heritage. Proceedings of the 6th Italian Conference of Researchers in Geotechnical Engineering (CNRIG), Bologna, 22–23 September 2016, Procedia Engineering (2016), Vol. 158, pp 134–139

  • CEN EC8 (1993) Design of structures for earthquake resistance. European Prestandard, ENV 1993. European Committee for Standardisation

  • Di Giulio G, Gaudiosi I, Cara F, Milana G, Tallini M (2014) Shear-wave velocity profile and seismic input derived from ambient vibration array measurements: the case study of downtown L’Aquila. Geophys J Int 198(2):848–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro A, Grasso S, Maugeri M, Totani F (2016) Seismic response analysis in the southern part of the historic Centre of the City of L’Aquila (Italy). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 88(2016):256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisetti F, Vezzani L (1980) The structural features of the Iblean plateau and the mount Judica area (SE Sicily): a microtectonic contribution to the deformational history of the Calabrian arc. Bull Italian Geol Soc 99:57–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso S, Maugeri M (2014) Seismic microzonation studies for the City of Ragusa (Italy). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 56(2014):86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso S, Laurenzano G, Maugeri M, Priolo E (2005) Seismic response in Catania by different methodologies. In: Maugeri M (ed) Seismic prevention of damage: a case study in a Mediterranean City, vol 2005. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 63–79

  • Groholski D, Hashash Y, Kim B, Musgrove M, Harmon J, Stewart J (2016) Simplified model for small-strain nonlinearity and strength in 1D seismic site response analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 04016042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001496

  • Idriss IM, Sun JI (1992) User’s manual for SHAKE91. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski M, Lo Presti DCF, Pallara O (1995) Role of in-situ testing in geotechnical earthquake engineering. Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, April 2–7, 1995, vol. II, pp 1523–1546

  • Kottke AR, Rathje EM (2008) Technical manual for strata. PEER report. In: Pacific earthquake. Engineering Research Center College of Engineering. University of California, Berkeley

  • Lasley SJ, Green RA, Rodriguez-Marek A (2014) Comparison of equivalent-linear site response analysis software. Tenth U.S. National Conference on earthquake engineering Frontiers of earthquake engineering. July 21–25, 2014. 10NCEE Anchorage, Alaska

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurenzano G, Priolo E, Klinc P, Vuan A (2004) Near fault earthquake scenarios for the February 20, 1818 M=6.2 “Catanese” event. Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Simulation in Risk Analysis and Hazard Mitigation: “Risk Analysis 2004″, Rhodes, 27–29 September 2004, pp 81–91

  • Lo Presti DCF, Jamiolkowski M, Cavallaro A, Pallara O (1999a) Influence of reconsolidation techniques and strain rate on the stiffness of undisturbed clays from triaxial tests. Geotech Test J 22(3):211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Presti DCF, Jamiolkowski M, Cavallaro A, Pallara O (1999b) Anisotropy of small strain stiffness in undisturbed and reconstituted clays. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Pre-failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Torino, 28–30 September 1999, pp 3–10

  • Maugeri M, Cavallaro A (1999) Dynamic characterisation of soils from laboratory tests. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Panelist Paper, Lisbon, 21–25 June 1999, pp 863–868

  • Ng CWW, Wang Y (2001) Field and laboratory measurements of small strain stiffness of decomposed granites. Soils Found 41(3):57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccomanno I (2007) L’Hangar per Dirigibili di Augusta. Associazione Hangar Team Augusta

  • Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972a) SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. College of Engineering, Report no. EERC 72–12. University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Schnabel P, Seed HB, Lysmer J (1972b) Modification of seismograph records for effects of local soil conditions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62(6):1649–1664

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel P, Seed HB, Lysmer JE (1973) Modification of seismograph records for effects of local soil conditions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 63(2):750

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe KHII, Hoar RJ (1978) Variable affecting in situ seismic measurement. Proceeding of the Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, ASCE, Pasadena; CA, 2, pp 919–939

  • Woods RD (1978) Measurement of dynamic soil properties. Earthq Eng Soil Dyn Pasadena 1:91–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods RD (1991) Field and laboratory determination of soil properties at low and high strains. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, April 2–7, 1995, SOA1

  • Woods RD (1994) Borehole methods in shallow seismic exploration. State of the Art, Proceeding of the 13thInternational Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, India TC N°. 10, pp 91–100

  • Woods RD, Stokoe KH II (1985) Shallow seismic exploration in soil dynamics. Richard commemorative lectures. ASCE:120–156

  • Yokota K, Imai T, Konno M (1981) Dynamic deformation characteristics of soils determined by laboratory tests. OYO Tec Rep 3:13–37

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNR - IBAM (Italian National Research Council - Institute for Archaeological and Monumental Heritage), Palazzo Ingrassia, Via Biblioteca n. 4, 95124, Catania, Italy

    Antonio Cavallaro

  2. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna “Kore”, Enna Bassa, 94100, Enna, Italy

    Francesco Castelli & Valentina Lentini

  3. Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Catania, Via S. Sofia n. 64, 95123, Catania, Italy

    Antonio Ferraro & Salvatore Grasso

Authors
  1. Antonio Cavallaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Castelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Ferraro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salvatore Grasso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Valentina Lentini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Castelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavallaro, A., Castelli, F., Ferraro, A. et al. Site response analysis for the seismic improvement of a historical and monumental building: the case study of Augusta Hangar. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77, 1217–1248 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1170-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1170-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation