Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proficiency testing as a tool for implementing internal quality control: the case of ochratoxin A in cocoa powder

  • Practitioner’s Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the interlaboratory study aimed at assessing the performance of 18 laboratories (14 national and 4 European) for Ochratoxin A (OTA) determination in cocoa powder samples. The study was tested at three levels of OTA covering the range in which presumably European regulatory limits could fall in the near future. For the extraction step, almost all laboratories used an aqueous solution of sodium hydrogen carbonate with the exception of one laboratory using dichloromethane consistently with the ELISA procedure adopted in the study. The clean-up step was performed by utilizing the immunoaffinity columns by the two main manufacturers (R-Biopharm Rhone and VICAM) and for the quantitative analysis, HPLC was used by all the participants except one using ELISA. From the output of the study, it can be concluded that at low level (0.19 μg/kg) 10 out of 18 (56%), at medium level (0.45 μg/kg) 11 out of 18 (61%), and at high level (1.45 μg/kg) 12 out of 18 (67%) results fell within the satisfactory ranges. This interlaboratory study provides an estimate of the performance of national and European laboratories involved in OTA determination in cocoa powder samples, which sounds extremely valuable in view of potential future legislation by the European Commission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Park DL, Njapau H, Coker RD (1998) Sampling programs for mycotoxins: perspectives and recommendations. In: Miraglia M, van Egmond HP, Brera C, Gilbert J (eds) Mycotoxins and phycotoxins developments in chemistry, toxicology and food safety. Alaken Inc., Colorado, United States, pp 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission (2002) Commission Decision (EEC) No. 657/2002. Commission Decision of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results (text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C (2002) 3044). In: Official Journal of the European Communities, No. L 221. European Economic Commission, Brussels, Belgium

  3. European Economic Commission (2004). Regulation EC No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official control performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food low, animal health and animal welfare rules. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, No. L 165/1. European Economic Commission, Brussels, Belgium

  4. CEN Standard 13505 (1999) Food analysis – biotoxins – criteria of analytical methods of mycotoxins

  5. ISO/IEC/EN 17025 – formerly ISO Guide 25 & EN45001 General requirements for the competence of calibration and testing laboratories

  6. European Standard EN ISO/IEC 17025:1999 CEN/CENELEC (2000) European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  7. Horwitz W (1998) Pure Appl Chem 60:855–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ISO/IEC Guide 43-2 (1997) Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons - Part 2: Selection and use of proficiency testing schemes by laboratory accreditation bodies

  9. Thompson M, Wood R (2006) Pure Appl Chem 78(1):145–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brera C, Miraglia M (1996) Mikrochimica Acta 123:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. European Economic Commission (2005) Regulation 123/2005/EC. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, L 25/3, 28/01/2005

  12. Frisvald JC (1989) J Mycologia 81:837–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Task 3.2.7. (2002) Assessment of dietary intake of ochratoxin A by the population of EU member states. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/food/ fs/scoop/3.2.7_en.pdf

  14. Iavicoli I, Brera C, Carelli G, Caputi RM, Marinaccio A, Miraglia M (2002) J Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75(6):381–386

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brera C, Miraglia M, Calfapietra FR, Pazzaglini B, Grossi S, Yazdanpanah H (2001) Ochratoxin A in human milk: exposure assessment of babies. In: De Koe W, Samson R, van Egmond HP, Gilbert J (eds) Mycotoxins and phycotoxins in perspective at the turn of the millennium. Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scott PM, Kanhere SR, Lau BP, Lewis DA, Hayward S, Ryan JJ, Kuiper-Goodman T (1998) Food Addit Contam 15:555–562

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. IARC (1993) Monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. Vol 56. http://www.iarc.uaf.edu/2002_ conferences.html

  18. Analytical Methods Committee (1998) Robust statistics – how not to reject outliers, Part 1. Basic concepts. Analyst 114:1693–1697

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson M (2000) Analyst 125:385–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Food Analysis Performance Assessment Scheme (FAPAS) (2002) Protocol for the organization and analysis of data, 6th edn

  21. Brera C, Grossi S, Miraglia M (2005) J Liquid Chromatogr Rel Technol 28(1):35–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Visconti A, Pascale M, Centonze G (2001) J AOAC Int 84(6):1818–1827

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Azevedo Vargas E, Alves dos Santos E, Pittet A (2005) J AOAC Int 88(3):773–779

    Google Scholar 

  24. MacDonald SJ, Anderson S, Brereton P, Wood R (2003) J AOAC Int 86(6):1164–1171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Entwisle C, Williams AC, Mann PJ, Russell J, Slack PT, Gilbert J (2001) J AOAC Int 83(6):1377–1383

    Google Scholar 

  26. Entwisle C, Williams AC, Mann PJ, Russell J, Slack PT, Gilbert J (2001) J AOAC Int 84(2):444–450

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their thanks to Ms. Viviana Renzi for her helpful technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Centre of Food Quality and Risk Assessment – GMO and Mycotoxins Unit, Italian National Institute of Health (ISS), Viale Regina Elena, 299-00161, Rome, Italy

    C. Brera, S. Grossi, F. Debegnach, B. De Santis, V. Minardi & M. Miraglia

Authors
  1. C. Brera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Grossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Debegnach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. De Santis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. Minardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Miraglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Debegnach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brera, C., Grossi, S., Debegnach, F. et al. Proficiency testing as a tool for implementing internal quality control: the case of ochratoxin A in cocoa powder. Accred Qual Assur 11, 349–355 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0174-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0174-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation