Advertisement

The “Shetty test” in ankle injuries: validation of a novel test to rule out ankle fractures

  • Vijay Shetty
  • Sandeep Wasnik
  • Chintan Hegde
  • Vishvas Shetty
  • Sarang Kasture
  • Harshad Thakur
Original Article

Abstract

Ankle sprains are by far the commonest ankle injuries. The traditional clinical approach, to any ankle injury, is a clinical examination followed by radiological examination. We have developed a simple clinical test to rule out fractures in ankle injuries and thereby eliminating the necessity for radiological examination. Our test is simple, reproducible, economic, time saving and avoids potential radiation exposure risks.

Keywords

Ankle sprain Ankle fractures Clinical test for ankle fracture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Amber Mittal, DePuy Fellow. Hiranandani Orthopaedic Medical Education (HOME). Dr. L.H. Hiranandani Hospital. Powai, Mumbai. India.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Amendola A, Williams G, Foster D (2006) Evidence-based approach to treatment of acute traumatic syndesmosis (high ankle) sprains. Sports Med Arthrosc 14(4):232–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rammelt S, Schneiders W, Grass R, Rein S, Zwipp H (2011) Ligamentous injuries to the ankle joint. Z Orthop Unfall 149(5):45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2012) http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00150
  4. 4.
    Diehr P, Highley R, Dehkordi F, Wood R, Krueger L, Teitz C, Hermanson B (1988) Prediction of fracture in patients with acute musculoskeletal ankle trauma. Med Decis Mak 8(1):40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brooks SC, Potter BT, Rainey JB (1981) Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 282:607–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sujitkumar P, Hadfield JM, Yates DW (1986) Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries. Arch Emerg Med 3(2):101–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berlin L (2011) Communicating the harmful effects of radiation exposure from medical imaging: malpractice considerations. Health Phys 101(5):583–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garrick JG (1977) The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 5(6):241–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boruta PM, Bishop JO, Braly WG, Tullos HS (1990) Acute lateral ankle ligament injuries: a literature review. Foot Ankle 11(2):107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daly PeterJ, Fitzgerald RobertH, Joseph Melton L, Llstrup DM (1987) Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. Acta Orthop Scand 58:539–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheyerer MJ, Helfet DL, Wirth S, Werner CM (1987) Diagnostics in suspicion of ankle syndesmotic injury. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 40(4):192–197Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoshida M, Taniguchi K, Katayose M (2011) Analysis of muscle activity and ankle joint movement during the side-hop test. J Strength Cond Res 25(8):2255–2264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guillodo Y, Varache S, Saraux A (2010) Value of ultrasonography for detecting ligament damage in athletes with chronic ankle instability compared to computed arthrotomography. Foot Ankle Spec 3(6):331–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Breitenseher MJ (1999) Acute ankle injuries. Radiologe 39(1):16–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR (1992) A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med 21(4):384–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leddy JJ, Smolinski RJ, Lawrence J, Snyder JL, Priore RL (1998) Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures. Am J Sports Med 26(2):158–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, ter Riet G (2003) Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ 326(7386):417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dowling S, Spooner CH, Liang Y, Dryden DM, Friesen C, Klassen TP, Wright RB (2009) Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 16(4):277–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gravel J, Roy M, Carrière B (2010) 44–55-66-PM, a mnemonic that improves retention of the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med 17(8):859–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American College of Radiology (2005) The New England journal of medicine. University of California, Cancer Center, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berlin L (2011) Communicating the harmful effects of radiation exposure from medical imaging: malpractice considerations. Health Phys 101(5):583–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    New Choice Health (2012) http://newchoicehealth.com/Directory/Procedure/107/Ankle%20X-Ray (Last checked 14th February, 2012)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vijay Shetty
    • 1
  • Sandeep Wasnik
    • 1
  • Chintan Hegde
    • 1
  • Vishvas Shetty
    • 1
  • Sarang Kasture
    • 1
  • Harshad Thakur
    • 2
  1. 1.Hiranandani Orthopaedic Medical Education (HOME)Dr L. H. Hiranandani HospitalPowai, MumbaiIndia
  2. 2.School of Health System Studies, Center for Public HealthTata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS)Deonar, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations