Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT morphology and morphometry of the normal adult coccyx

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lack of data on the in vivo morphology and morphometry of the normal adult coccyx hampers understanding of radiological abnormalities in idiopathic coccydynia. The aim of this study was to investigate normal adult sacrococcygeal morphometry.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 112 adult CT scans (mean age 63 ± 14.6 years, 50 males) evaluated the following: number of coccygeal segments; joint fusion; coccygeal spicules, subluxation, sacralization, and scoliosis; sacrococcygeal straight and curved lengths and curvature indices; sacrococcygeal and intercoccygeal angles; and lateral deviation of the coccyx tip.

Results

Four coccygeal segments were present in 76 % of scans. Sacrococcygeal fusion was present in 57 % and intercoccygeal fusion was increasingly common more caudally; there was no significant association with age or gender. A bony spicule was present in 23 %. Subluxation was rare. Nine of 12 coccyges with a retroverted tip were female. Mean coccygeal curved length was 4.4 ± 0.8 cm in men and 4.0 ± 0.8 cm in women (P < 0.01). Mean angle between first and last coccygeal segments was 138° ± 25° in men and 147° ± 25° in women (P = 0.08). There was no significant correlation between coccygeal length or curvature and stature, age or BMI.

Conclusions

In this first detailed study of the CT morphology and morphometry of the adult coccyx, sacrococcygeal and intercoccygeal joint fusion was common. Female coccyges were shorter, straighter, and may be more prone to retroversion, factors that may be relevant to the markedly higher prevalence of idiopathic coccydynia in women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woon JTK, Stringer MD (2012) Clinical anatomy of the coccyx: a systematic review. Clin Anat 25:158–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Karadimas EJ, Trypsiannis G, Giannoudis PV (2010) Surgical treatment of coccygodynia: an analytic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 20:698–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Postacchini F, Massobrio M (1983) Idiopathic coccygodynia. Analysis of fifty-one operative cases and a radiographic study of the normal coccyx. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1116–1124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerimoglu U, Dagoglu MG, Ergen FB (2007) Intercoccygeal angle and type of coccyx in asymptomatic patients. Surg Radiol Anat 29:683–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Internet). Maryland. Department of Health and Human Services. c2000–2009. http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/. Accessed 17 February 2012

  6. Health and Social Care Information Centre (Internet). London. Hospital Episode Statistics online. c2005–2012. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/. Accessed 18 February 2012

  7. Maigne JY, Doursounian L, Chatellier G (2000) Causes and mechanisms of common coccydynia: role of body mass index and coccygeal trauma. Spine 25:3072–3079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maigne JY, Pigeau I, Roger B (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the painful adult coccyx. Eur Spine J (Epub ahead of print)

  9. Bilgic S, Kurklu M, Yurttas Y, Ozkan H, Oguz E, Sehirlioglu A (2000) Coccygectomy-with or without periosteal resection. Int Orthop 34:537–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gáspár L, Jónás Z, Kiss L, Vereb G, Csernátony Z (2009) Coccygectomy has a favorable effect on the intensity, manifestation, and characteristics of pain caused by coccygodynia: a retrospective evaluation of 34 patients followed for 3–18 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 19:403–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trollegaard AM, Aarby NS, Hellberg S (2000) Coccygectomy: an effective treatment option for chronic coccydynia: retrospective results in 41 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:242–245

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim NH, Suk KS (1999) Clinical and radiological differences between traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia. Yonsei Med J 40:215–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Duncan G (1937) Painful coccyx. Arch Surg 34:1088–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization (Internet). Geneva. Obesity. c2012. http://www.who.int/topics/obesity/en/. Accessed 20 February 2012

  15. Kim G, Jung HJ, Lee HJ, Lee JS, Koo S, Chang SH (2012) Accuracy and reliability of length measurements on three-dimensional computed tomography using open-source OsiriX software. J Digit Imaging 25:486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy R, Slater A, Uberoi R, Bungay H, Ferrett C (2010) Reduction of perception error by double reporting of minimal preparation CT colon. Br J Radiol 83:331–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nathan ST, Fisher BE, Roberts CS (2010) Coccydynia. A review of pathoanatomy, aetiology, treatment and outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1622–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pelin C, Duyar I, Kayahan EM, Zagyapan R, Aguldere AM, Erar A (2005) Body height estimation based on dimensions of sacral and coccygeal vertebrae. J Forensic Sci 50:294–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saluja PG (1988) The incidence of ossification of the sacrococcygeal joint. J Anat 156:11–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tague RG (2011) Fusion of coccyx to sacrum in humans: prevalence, correlates, and effect on pelvic size, with obstetrical and evolutionary implications. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:426–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grassi R, Lombardi G, Reginelli A, Capasso F, Romano F, Floriani I, Colacurci N (2007) Coccygeal movement: assessment with dynamic MRI. Eur J Radiol 61:473–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Le Double A (1912) Traité des variations de la colonne vertébrale de l’homme et de leur signification au point de vue de l’anthropologie zoologique. Vigot Freres, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oh CS, Chung IH, Ji HJ, Yoon DM (2004) Clinical implications of topographic anatomy on the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology 101:249–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hellems HK, Keats TE (1971) Measurement of the normal lumbosacral angle. Am J Roentgenol 113:642–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karakas HM, Celbis O, Harma A, Alicioglu B (2011) Total body height estimation using sacrum height in Anatolian Caucasians: multidetector computed tomography-based virtual anthropometry. Skeletal Radiol 40:623–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wray CC, Easom S, Hoskinson J (1991) Coccydynia. Aetiology and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:335–338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Doursounian L, Maigne JY, Faure F, Chatellier G (2004) Coccygectomy for instability of the coccyx. Int Orthop 28:176–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dennell LV, Nathan S (2004) Coccygeal retroversion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:E256–E257

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Rona Buttimore, Research Nurse at Christchurch Hospital for collecting CT scans and patient data. Also thanks to Dr Claire Cameron and Dr Ali Mirjalili for assistance with statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. Stringer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woon, J.T.K., Perumal, V., Maigne, JY. et al. CT morphology and morphometry of the normal adult coccyx. Eur Spine J 22, 863–870 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2595-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2595-2

Keywords

Navigation