Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intercoccygeal angle and type of coccyx in asymptomatic patients

  • Medical Imaging
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the intercoccygeal angle of asymptomatic patients (without coccydynia), to study if there is a difference of angle between types of coccyx and between genders with the same type of coccyx.

Materials and methods

Ninety-two patients (42 females, 50 males, range of ages 8–86, mean 50) who underwent computed tomography (CT) angiography and colonoscopy were included in the study. CT images with slice thickness of 1 or 1.5 mm were evaluated with 3D sagittal reformats and intercoccygeal angle, type of coccyx were examined.

Results

Twenty-one females and 18 males had type 1 coccyx with mean intercoccygeal angle 36.4° ± 10.56 (33.29° for females and 40.05° for males) and the difference of the angles between genders is statistically significant (P = 0.044). Among 36 patients (14 were females and 22 were males) with type 2 coccyx demonstrated mean intercoccygeal angle of 56.36° ± 10.8. 15 patients were shown to have type 3 coccyx and the mean intercoccygeal angle was 72.1° ± 31.86. No significant difference of angles was seen between genders. Type 4 coccyx was not seen and two coccyx could not be classified. There was a significant difference of intercoccygeal angle between the groups overall.

Conclusion

Type 1 is the most common coccyx type in asymptomatic patients. Significant difference of intercoccygeal angle was defined between the types of coccyx. These values may be reference for the patients underwent surgery for the coccydynia and a new classification may be needed since exceptional shape of coccyx exists that could not be defined according to the known classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balain B, Eisenstein SM, Alo GO, Darby AJ, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Roberts Se, Jaffray DC (2006) Coccygectomy for coccydynia: case series and review of literature. Spine 31:414–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgia C (1964) Coccygodynia: its diagnosis and treatment. Mil Med 129:335–338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennell LV, Nathan S (2004) Coccygeal retroversion. Spine 29:256–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan G (1937) Painful coccyx. Arch Surg 37:1088–1104

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fogel GR, Cunningham PY 3rd, Esses SI (2004) Coccygodynia: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:49–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grassi R, Lombardi G, Reginelli A, Capasso F, Romano F, Floriani I, Colacurci N (2007) Coccygeal movement: assessment with dynamic MRI. Eur J Radiol 61:473–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gross NP, Van Dain BE (1995) Total coccygectomy for relief of coccygectomy: A retrospective review. J Spinal Disord 8:328–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamsa W (1937) Coccygodynia: a study of end result of treatment. J Iowa State Med Soc 27:154–156

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hellberg S, Strange-Vognsen H (1990) Coccygodynia treated by resection of the coccyx. Acta Orthop Scand 61:463–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kersey PJ (1980) Non-operative management of coccygodynia. Lancet 1:318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Key JA (1937) Operative treatment of coccydynia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 19:759–764

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim NH, Kyunk SS (1999) Clinical and radiological differences between traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia. Yonsei Med J 40:215–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maigne JY, Doursounian L, Chatellier G (2000) Causes and mechanisms of common coccydynia: Role of body mass index and coccygeal trauma. Spine 25:3072–3079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maigne JY, Guedj S, Straus C (1994) Idiopathic coccygodynia. Lateral roentgenograms in the sitting position and coccygeal discography. Spine 19:930–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maigne JY, Lagauche D, Doursounian L (2000) Instability of the coccyx in coccydynia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1038–1041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maigne JY, Tamalet B (1996) Standardized radiologic protocol for the study of common coccygodynia and characteristics of the lesions observed in the sitting position. Clinical elements differentiating luxation, hypermobility, and normal mobility. Spine 21:2588–2593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Postacchini F, Massobrio M (1983) Idiopathic coccygodynia. Analysis of fifty-one operative cases and a radiographic study of the normal coccyx. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1116–1124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pyper JB (1957) Excision of the coccyx for coccydynia: a study of results in twenty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 39:733–737

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson J (1859) Clinical lectures on the diseases of women. Lecture XVII Cocygodynia and dseases and deformities of the coccyx. Medial Times Gazette 40:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yamashita K (1988) Radiological study of 1500 coccyces. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 62:23–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulku Kerimoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerimoglu, U., Dagoglu, M.G. & Ergen, F.B. Intercoccygeal angle and type of coccyx in asymptomatic patients. Surg Radiol Anat 29, 683–687 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0262-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0262-9

Keywords

Navigation