Skip to main content
Log in

Results of the FUSE Evaluation Project in France

  • 2019 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD) is in charge in France of the continuing medical education of digestive surgeons. Since 2016 and in collaboration with SAGES, it has offered the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program as part of the continuing education for surgeons including eLearning and hands-on workshops.

Methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the FUSE program on the participants by participating in a knowledge test and completing a survey.

Results

485 participants fully completed the knowledge test of 18 questions. Post-test assessment showed an increase in the mean score with respect to pre-test assessment, and the surgeons who have participated to the hands-on workshops had a better score. 304 participants filled the survey of 6 questions. The majority were satisfied by the FUSE program and felt that the objectives were achieved.

Conclusions

The FUSE program developed by SAGES and adopted by the FCVD in France was very much appreciated by the participants and achieved its educational objectives. Our goal is to spread it as widely as possible to all members of the operating room team.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sankaranarayanan G, Resapu RR, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg S, De S (2013) Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc 27:3056–3072

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Borie F, Mathonnet M, Deleuze A, Millat B, Gravie JF, Johanet H, Lesage JP, Gugenheim J (2018) Risk management for surgical energy-driven devices used in the operating room. J Visc Surg 155:259–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Argawal BB, Gupta M, Agarwal S, Mahajan K (2007) Anatomical footprint for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using any energy source: a modified technique. Surg Endosc 21:2154–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Overbey DM, Townsend NT, Chapman BC, Bennett DT, Foley LS, Rau AS, Yi JA, Jones EL, Stiegmann GV, Robinson TN (2015) Surgical energy-based device injuries and fatalities reported to the food and drug administration. J Am Coll Surg 221(197–205):e191

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchshuber P, Schwaitzberg S, Jones D, Jones SB, Feldman L, Munro M, Robinson T, Purcell-Jackson G, Mikami D, Madani A, Brunt M, Dunkin B, Gugliemi C, Groah L, Lim R, Mischna J, Voyles CR (2018) The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose. Surg Endosc 32(6):2583–2602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman LS, Brunt LM, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Jones SB, Mischna J, Munro MG, Rozner MA, Schwaitzberg SD (2013) Rationale for the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) curriculum assessment: focus on safety. Surg Endosc 27:4054–4059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwaitzberg SD (2012) Evolution and revolutions in surgical energy. In: Feldman LS, Fuchshuber PR, Jones DB (eds) The SAGES manual on the fundamental use of surgical energy (FUSE). Springer, New York, pp 3–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connor JL, Bloom DA (1996) William T Bovie and electrosurgery. Surgery 119(4):390–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nduka CC, Super PA, Monson JR, Darzi AW (1994) Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 179:161–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman LS, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Mischna J, Schwaitzberg SD, Force FT (2012) Surgeons don’t know what they don’t know about the safe use of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc 26:2735–2739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Banki F, Ochoa K, Carrillo ME et al (2013) A surgical team with focus on staff education in a community hospital improves outcomes, costs and patient satisfaction. Am J Surg 206:1007–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rinder CS (2008) Fire safety in the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21:790–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Apfelbaum JL, Caplan RA, Barker SJ, Connis RT, Cowles C, Ehrenwerth J, Nickinovich DG, Pritchard D, Roberson DW, Caplan RA, Barker SJ, Connis RT, Cowles C, de Richemond AL, Ehrenwerth J, Nickinovich DG, Pritchard D, Roberson DW, Wolf GL (2013) Practice advisory for the prevention and management of operating room fires. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on operating room fires. Anesthesiology 118:271–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Madani A, Watanabe Y, Vassiliou MC, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Schwaizberg SD, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2014) Impact of hands on component on learning in the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy TM (FUSE) curriculum: a randomized-controlled trail in surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 28(10):2772–2782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Madani A, Watanabe Y, Townsend N, Pucher PH, Robinson TN, Egerszegi PE, Olasky J, Bachman SL, Park CW, Amin N, Tang DT, Haase E, Bardana D, Jones DB, Vassiliou M, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2016) Structured simulation improves learning of the Fundamental Use of Surgical EnergyTM curriculum: a multicenter randomized-controlled trial. Surg Endosc 30:684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Gugenheim.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Jean Gugenheim, Tarek Debs, Jean-François Gravie, Alain Deleuze, Bertrand Millat, Frédéric Borie, Muriel Mathonnet have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Informed consent

No IRB was required as this study does not involve any patient and is a study on the field of surgeon’s education. All participants gave their consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gugenheim, J., Debs, T., Gravié, JF. et al. Results of the FUSE Evaluation Project in France. Surg Endosc 34, 1819–1822 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06938-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06938-0

Keywords

Navigation