Advertisement

The sensitivity of climatological SST to slab ocean model thickness

  • Zaiyu WangEmail author
  • Edwin K. Schneider
  • Natalie J. Burls
Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

A pronounced tropical cooling (> 4 °C) and high-latitude warming in the annual mean sea surface temperature (SST) climatology is found in a numerical experiment conducted with a coupled model consisting of an atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) coupled to a slab ocean model (SOM) in which the time-independent SOM thickness is reduced by a factor of two. The results suggest that biases in the ocean mixed layer depth could be contributing to SST biases in coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models. These changes in annual mean SST are noteworthy since in simple climate models the SOM thickness controls the amplitude and phase of the SST annual cycle, but it plays no role in determining the annual mean SST. Results from the numerical experiment indicate that halving of the SOM thickness not only changes annual cycle amplitude but results in asymmetrical changes in the annual cycle that rectify onto annual mean SST. The changed SOM thickness is found to primarily affect the surface net solar flux and latent heat flux components. However, due to the SOM equilibrium energy budget constraint, the annual mean net surface heat flux does not change, and the solar and latent heat fluxes changes compensate for each other. There is no such constraint on the annual cycle of heat fluxes, where the solar and latent components act to reinforce each other over much of the ocean, with the notable exception of the tropic Pacific warm pool region. We investigate the influence of the amplitude of the SST annual cycle on the annual mean SST through the net surface heat flux and its components using a two-step approach. First, two prescribed SST AGCM simulations are carried out, both with the annual mean SST of the full-thickness SOM coupled model simulation: one forced with the SST annual cycle of the full-thickness SOM coupled simulation, and the other forced with the SST annual cycle of the half-thickness SOM coupled simulation. Second, the impacts of these changes in the annual cycle on the annual mean SST are assessed in a full-thickness AGCM-SOM coupled simulation forced by the net, annual-mean, surface heat flux changes produced by the SST annual cycle changes in the first step. It is found that these net surface heat flux changes can largely reproduce the annual mean SST sensitivity to SOM thickness found in the coupled SOM thickness halving experiment. The effects on the annual mean heat flux components and annual mean SST from changes in the SOM thickness in an idealized limiting case are also considered.

Keywords

Ocean mixed layer depth Annual cycle Model bias 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Aaron Donohoe and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback and advice on how to improve the clarity of the manuscript. This research was supported by NSF grants AGS-1338427 and 1558821, NOAA NA14OAR4310160, and NASA NNX14AM19G. N.J.B. is supported by NSF Grant AGS-1613318 and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation as a Research Fellow. Computing resources (ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc) were provided by the Climate Simulation Laboratory at NCAR’s Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the National Science Foundation and other agencies. We would like to acknowledge high-performance computing support from Cheyenne ( https://doi.org/10.5065/d6rx99hx) provided by NCAR’s Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Balmaseda MA, Mogensen K, Weaver AT (2013) Evaluation of the ECMWF ocean reanalysis system ORAS4. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139(674):1132–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burls NJ, Muir L, Vincent EM, Fedorov AV (2017) Extra-tropical origin of equatorial Pacific cold bias in climate models with links to cloud albedo. Clim Dyn 49(5–6):2093–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen H, Schneider EK, Kirtman BP, Colfescu I (2013) Evaluation of weather noise and its role in climate model simulations. J Clim 26:3766–3784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colfescu I, Schneider EK (2017) Internal atmospheric noise characteristics in twentieth century coupled atmosphere–ocean model simulations. Clim Dyn 49(5–6):2205–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donohoe A, Battisti DS (2013) The seasonal cycle of atmospheric heating and temperature. J Clim 26:4962–4980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donohoe A, Frierson DMW, Battisti DS (2014) The effect of ocean mixed layer depth on climate in slab ocean aquaplanet experiments. Clim Dyn 43(3–4):1041–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gates WL (1992) AMIP: the atmospheric model intercomparison project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73:1962–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill A (1980) Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106(449):447–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hasselmann K (1976) Stochastic climate models. Part I: theory. Tellus 28:473–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hurrell JW et al (2008) A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the community atmosphere model. J Clim 21:5145–5153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hurrell JW et al (2013) The community earth system model: a framework for collaborative research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1339–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kay JE et al (2015) The community earth system model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96:1333–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim GE, Gnanadesikan A, Del Castillo CE, Pradal MA (2018) Upper ocean cooling in a coupled climate model due to light attenuation by yellowing materials. Geophys Res Lett 45:6134–6140Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence DM et al (2011) Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 3:M03001Google Scholar
  15. Lindzen RS, Hou AY (1988) Hadley circulations for zonally averaged heating centered off the equator. J Atmos Sci 45:2416–2427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Neale RB et al (2012) Description of the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM 5.0), Tech Note NCAR/TN-486 + STR, Natl Cent for Atmos ResGoogle Scholar
  17. Schneider EK (1983) Martian great dust storms: interpretive axially symmetric models. Icarus 55:302–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schneider EK (1987) A simplified model of the modified hadley circulation. J Atmos Sci 44:3311–3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schneider EK (1996) A note on the annual cycle of sea surface temperature at the equator. Technical Report. Center Ocean Land Atmosphere Studies 36:17Google Scholar
  20. Schneider EK, Zhu Z (1998) Sensitivity of the simulated annual cycle of sea surface temperature in the equatorial pacific to sunlight penetration. J Clim 11:1932–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas MD, Fedorov AV (2017) The eastern subtropical Pacific origin of the equatorial cold bias in climate models: a Lagrangian perspective. J Clim 30:5885–5900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vertenstein M et al (2013) CESM user’s guide (cesm1.2 release series user’s guide). NCAR Tech Note. http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm1.2/cesm/doc/usersguide/book1.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Earth SciencesGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations