Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

On-chip ionic current sensor

  • Published:
Applied Physics A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neural implants that deliver drugs or electrical stimuli via microfluidic ports are promising in providing therapy for various disorders such as epilepsy, chronic pain, and vestibular diseases. To deliver the stimuli to a neural target, these devices incorporate two or more electrodes that apply an electric field to drive charged particles or ions along an aqueous route provided by microfluidic channels. The amount of drug/current delivered is determined by measuring the ionic current flow. When the ionic current can only travel from one electrode to another via a single route or channel, the amount of therapeutic current is stoichiometrically equal to the electronic current applied by the device and therefore can be measured with an electronic current sensor. However, some recently developed devices contain networks of branched channels. In this case, the presence of multiple parallel ionic current paths makes it so that the current through any one individual channel is no longer measurable by observing electronic current alone. Here, we present an on-chip sensor that uses two Pt/Ir electrodes to transduce the ionic current through a target channel into a measurable voltage signal. The size of the metal wires did not impact the measured voltage, the size of the channel between the two sensing electrodes determines sensitivity of the sensor, change in temperature can cause a change in readings, and input impedance of the voltage measuring equipment must be greater than 1 GΩ to maintain measurement stability. The sensor showed stability of reading in a one-week longevity test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.M. Proctor, A. Slézia, A. Kaszas et al., Electrophoretic drug delivery for seizure control. Sci. Adv. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D.M. Ackermann, N. Bhadra, E.L. Foldes et al., Separated interface nerve electrode prevents direct current induced nerve damage. J. Neurosci. Methods 201, 173–176 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Yang, M. Anderson, S. He et al., Differential expression of voltage-gated sodium channels in afferent neurons renders selective neural block by ionic direct current. Sci. Adv. 4, 1438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1438

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. F.P. Aplin, D. Singh, Y. Gene, N. Surgery, Ionic direct current modulation for combined inhibition/excitation of the vestibular system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 66, 775–783 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2018.2856698.Ionic

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Manca, E. Glowatzki, D.C. Roberts et al., Ionic direct current modulation evokes spike-rate adaptation in the vestibular periphery. Sci. Rep. 9, 18924 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55045-6

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Isaksson, P. Kjäll, D. Nilsson et al., Electronic control of Ca2+ signalling in neuronal cells using an organic electronic ion pump. Nat. Mater. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Rattay, The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience 89, 335–346 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00330-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D.T. Simon, S. Kurup, K.C. Larsson et al., Organic electronics for precise delivery of neurotransmitters to modulate mammalian sensory function. Nat. Mater. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng C, Thakur R, Nair AR, et al (2017) Miniature elastomeric valve design for safe direct current stimulator. IEEE Biomed Circuits Syst Conf Healthc Technol [proceedings] IEEE Biomed Circuits Syst Conf 2017:1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOCAS.2017.8325194

  10. Fridman G (2017) Safe direct current stimulator design for reduced power consumption and increased reliability. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

  11. G.Y. Fridman, C.C. Della Santina, Safe direct current stimulation to expand capabilities of neural prostheses. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil Eng. 21, 319–328 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2245423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C.M. Stanford, Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 11(1), 354–369 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Wang, D. Lee, L. Zhang et al., Systematic prevention of bubble formation and accumulation for long-term culture of pancreatic islet cells in microfluidic device. Biomed. Microdevices (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-011-9618-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K.D. Piatkevich, E.E. Jung, C. Straub et al., A robotic multidimensional directed evolution approach applied to fluorescent voltage reporters article. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 352–360 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-018-0004-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Bar-Cohen, Q. Zhang, Electroactive polymer actuators and sensors. MRS Bull (2008). https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2008.42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V.L.D.S.N. Button, Principles of Measurement and Transduction of Biomedical Variables (Principles of Measurement and Transduction of Biomedical Variables Elsevier, Netherlands, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-14261-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. S.F. Cogan, Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10, 275–309 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F.P. Aplin, G.Y. Fridman, Implantable direct current neural modulation: theory, feasibility, and efficacy. Front. Neurosci. 13, 379 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F.P. Aplin, D. Singh, S.C.C. Della, G.Y. Fridman, Combined ionic direct current and pulse frequency modulation improves the dynamic range of vestibular canal stimulation. J. Vestib. Res. (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/ves-190651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. F.L.H. Gielen, P. Bergveld, Comparison of electrode impedances of Pt, PtIr (10% Ir) and Ir-AIROF electrodes used in electrophysiological experiments. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. I.B. Obot, I.B. Onyeachu, A. Zeino, S.A. Umoren, Electrochemical noise (EN) technique: review of recent practical applications to corrosion electrochemistry research. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 33(13), 1453–1496 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yúfera A, Rueda A (2008) A method for bioimpedance measure with four- and two-electrode sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS’08 - “Personalized Healthcare through Technology”

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Raviraj Thakur and Patrick Ou for previous work toward an ionic current sensor. We also acknowledge the funding from NIH R01NS092726 that made this work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

    Chaojun Cheng

  2. Otolaryngology HNS, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

    Gene Fridman

  3. Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

    Grace Foxworthy & Gene Fridman

  4. Computer and Electrical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

    Gene Fridman

Authors
  1. Chaojun Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grace Foxworthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gene Fridman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gene Fridman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, C., Foxworthy, G. & Fridman, G. On-chip ionic current sensor. Appl. Phys. A 127, 314 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04469-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04469-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation