Efficacy of double inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of the synovium in the femoro-patellar joint without contrast enhancement
- 373 Downloads
To investigate the efficacy of double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence for evaluating the synovium of the femoro-patellar joint without contrast enhancement (CE).
Two radiologists independently evaluated the axial DIR and CE T1-weighted fat-saturated (CET1FS) images of 33 knees for agreement; the visualisation and distribution of the synovium were evaluated using a four-point visual scaling system at each of the five levels of the femoro-patellar joint and the location of the thickest synovium. The maximal synovial thickness at each sequence was measured by consensus.
The interobserver agreement was good (κ = 0.736) for the four-point scale, and was excellent for the location of the thickest synovium on DIR and CET1FS (κ = 0.955 and 0.954). The intersequential agreement for the area with the thickest synovium was also excellent (κ = 0.845 and κ = 0.828). The synovial thickness on each sequence showed excellent correlation (r = 0.872).
The DIR showed as good a correlation as CET1FS for the evaluation of the synovium at the femoro-patellar joint. DIR may be a useful MR technique for evaluating the synovium without CE.
• DIR can be useful for evaluating the synovium of the femoro-patellar joint.
• Interobserver and intersequential agreements between DIR and CET1FS were good.
• Mean thickness of the synovium was significantly different between two sequences.
KeywordsKnee Synovium Double inversion recovery Magnetic resonance imaging Contrast enhancement
Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated
Double inversion recovery
Synovium-to-bone signal ratio
Synovium-to-effusion signal ratio
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Wook Jin.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
This study has received funding by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant No. 2009-0089314).
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• diagnostic or prognostic study
• performed at one institution
- 6.Waterton JC, Ho M, Nordenmark LH et al (2017) Repeatability and response to therapy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis in a large multicentre trial setting. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4736-9
- 8.Violeta V, Mihaela M (2012) Francesco P, et al. Ultrasound of the hand and wrist in rheumatology 14:42–48Google Scholar
- 16.Magnotta VA, Friedman L, FIRST BIRN (2006) Measurement of Signal-to-Noise and Contrast-to-Noise in the fBIRN Multicenter Imaging Study. J Digit Imaging 19:140-147Google Scholar
- 17.Ostergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 42:918–929CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Oh HY et al (2016) Diagnostic Accuracy of a Fluid-attenuated Inversion-Recovery Sequence with Fat Suppression for Assessment of Peripatellar Synovitis: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Radiology 24:160155Google Scholar