Runners and fighters: clutch effects and body size drive innate antipredator behaviour in hatchling lizards
Innate antipredator responses are integral for survival in many species, particularly those which lack parental care. Antipredator responses include both active (fight or flight) and passive behaviours (immobility). As the success of antipredator responses directly relates to survival and fitness, investigating the drivers that explain variance in these traits is key to understanding how predation shapes the instinctive behaviour of animals. We quantified innate antipredator behaviour of hatchling Australian water dragons (Intellagama lesueurii) immediately after hatching using a model snake to simulate a series of attacks, and scored their behaviour using a fight or flight index. Then we explored which factors were related to dragon antipredator behaviour, such as habitat disturbance, origin population, morphology, and parental genetic effects and phenotype (clutch effects). We developed multiple hypotheses and used model selection to determine which factors drive variation in hatchling antipredator behaviour. Clutch effects explained a significant proportion of variation in innate antipredator responses, suggesting a heritable component. We also found an effect of body size on innate antipredator behaviour: larger hatchlings were more prone to flight behaviour (e.g. short-distance runs and long-distance sprinting), while smaller individuals were more prone to standing their ground and being aggressive (e.g. throat puffing, mouth gaping, biting). Clutch effects also explained a significant proportion of the variance in dragon body size. Our study provides evidence that the innate antipredator responses of water dragons are heritable in origin (directly through clutch effects, and indirectly through body size) and not associated with particular populations or habitat types. We suggest future research examine the survival implications of these responses.
The action an animal takes in response to a predator is a life or death decision, and can be required immediately after birth. These innate antipredator behaviours may be genetically linked, and enable individuals to emerge into their environment with the necessary behaviour to promote survival. We examined what factors drive hatchling lizards to exhibit different innate antipredator behaviour. Our study found that body size affected their innate behaviour: larger hatchlings were more prone to flee and smaller hatchlings were more likely to fight. Interestingly, parental genetics and phenotype (clutch effects) also significantly explained the variation in innate antipredator behaviour, which supports the hypothesis that these behaviours are heritable. Understanding what drives variation is a cornerstone of evolutionary biology, and our findings raise questions about how selection acts on antipredator behaviour and the degree to which they are plastic.
KeywordsBehavioural ecology Clutch effects Fight or flight Intellagama lesueurii Water dragon
We would like to thank the many individuals who assisted in the fieldwork: P. Bolton, T. Damasio, C. Fryns, G. Hughes, F. Kar, S. Klopper, L. Monk-Whipp, M. Mühlenhaupt, and D. Noble, as well as Taronga Zoo and the rest of the members of Macquarie University Lizard Lab. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers whose contributions improved this article.
This research was supported by Macquarie University (scholarship awarded to JB-G) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (scholarship awarded to JB-G).
Compliance with ethical standards
Lizard capture and our experimental protocols followed animal ethics guidelines that were approved by both the Macquarie University Animal Ethics Committee (ARA no. 2015/023) and Taronga Zoo Animal Ethics Committee (ARA no. 3b/08/15). Our research was approved by the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Office of Environment and Heritage (Licence no. SL100570).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Barton K (2009) MuMIn: multi-model inference. In: R package version 0.12.0. http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/mumin/
- Bellairs A (1970) The life of reptiles (volume 1). Universe Books, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- Canty A, Ripley B (2017) Boot: bootstrap R (S-plus) functions. R package version 1:3–20 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/boot/boot.pdf Google Scholar
- Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Cogger HG (2014) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia, 7th edn. Reed Books, Chatswood, NSWGoogle Scholar
- Doody JS, Harlow P, Douglass D, Thiem JD, Broadhurst B, Trembath D, Olsen J, Fuentes E, Rose T (2014) Patterns of predation and antipredator behavior in the australian water dragon, Physignathus lesueurii. Herpetol Conserv Biol 9:48–56Google Scholar
- Foster KL, Collins CE, Higham TE, Garland TJ Jr (2015) Determinants of lizard escape performance: decision, motivation, ability, and opportunity. In: Cooper WE, Blumstein DT (eds) Escaping from predators: an integrative view of escape decisions and refuge use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 287–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giesing E R, Suski CD, Warner RE, Bell AM (2010) Female sticklebacks transfer information via eggs: effects of maternal experience with predators on offspring. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, rspb20101819Google Scholar
- Greene HW (1988) Antipredator mechanisms in reptiles. In: Gans C, Huey RB (eds) Biology of the Reptilia. Alan R. Liss, New York, USA, pp 1–152Google Scholar
- Harlow PS (2001) Ecology of sex-determining mechanisms in Australian agamid lizards. PhD thesis, School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Harlow PS, Harlow MF (1997) Captive reproduction and longevity in the eastern water dragon (Physignathus lesueurii). Herpetofauna 27:14–19Google Scholar
- Harlow PS, Taylor JE (2000) Reproductive ecology of the jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus): an agamid lizard with temperature-dependent sex determination. Aust Ecol 25:640–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00070.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herzog HA, Burghardt GM (1986) Development of antipredator responses in snakes: I. Defensive and open-field behaviors in newborns and adults of three species of garter snakes (Thamnophis melanogaster, T. sirtalis, T. butleri). J Comp Psychol 100:372–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.100.4.372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Just W, Morris MR (2003) The Napoleon complex: why smaller males pick fights. Evol Ecol 17:509–522. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EVEC.0000005629.54152.83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kissner KJ, Forbes MR, Secoy DM (1997) Rattling behavior of prairie rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis viridis, Viperidae) in relation to sex, reproductive status, body size, and body temperature. Ethology 103:1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00146.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Losos JB (1990) The evolution of form and function: morphology and locomotor performance in West Indian Anolis lizards. Evolution 44:1189–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05225.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
- Ripley B (2018) Package ‘MASS. R package version 7:3–49 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/MASS.pdf Google Scholar
- Webb JK, Brown GP, Shine R (2001) Body size, locomotor speed and antipredator behaviour in a tropical snake (Tropidonophis mairii, Colubridae): the influence of incubation environments and genetic factors. Funct Ecol 15:561–568. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00570.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zuur A, Ieno E, Walker N, Saveliev A, Smith G (eds) (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Spring Science and Business Media, New York, USAGoogle Scholar