Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of two methods for the extraction of antioxidants from medicinal plants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiencies of two traditional extraction methods used in Chinese medicine (the decoction method and the maceration method) were evaluated for the extraction of antioxidants from medicinal plants. A group of medicinal plants possessing nutritious and tonic functions were chosen as model plants. A commonly used extraction method was used as a reference method. The antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents of the extracts were measured by ferric-reducing antioxidant power and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assays as well as the Folin–Ciocalteu method, respectively. The results obtained indicated that the two traditional extraction methods could effectively extract antioxidants from medicinal plants. These extraction methods can be applied to the analysis and purification of antioxidants in plants, respectively. At home, people can use these methods to extract antioxidants from plants for consumption. In the food industry, these methods could be utilized to prepare crude extracts from plants containing antioxidants for use as food additives.

Relation and comparison of extraction efficiencies of two traditional extraction methods with the reference method

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ (2000) Nature 408:239–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Poon HF, Calabrese V, Scapagnini G, Butterfield DA (2004) J Gerontol A 59:478–493

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eberhardt MV, Lee CY, Liu RH (2000) Nature 405:903–904

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gey KF (1990) Biochem Soc Trans 18:1041–1045

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stephens NG, Parsons A, Schofield PM, Kelly F, Cheeseman K, Mitchinson MJ (1996) Lancet 347:781–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ito N, Hirose M, Fukushima S, Tsuda H, Shirai T, Tatematsu M (1986) Food Chem Toxicol 24:1071–1082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Safer AM, Al-Nughamish AJ (1999) Histol Histopath 14:391–406

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu F, Ng TB (2000) Life Sci 66:725–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ou BX, Huang DJ, Hampsch-Woodill M (2003) FASEB J 17:127–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai YZ, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H (2004) Life Sci 74:2157–2184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dragland S, Senoo H, Wake K, Holte K, Blomhoff R (2003) J Nutr 133:1286–1290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. An ZF (2000) Treatment of common diseases with drug liquors. Athletic Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996) Anal Biochem 239:70–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Free Radic Biol Med 26:1231–1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pellegrini N, Serafini M, Colombi B, Del Rio D, Salvatore S, Bianchi M, Brighenti F (2003) J Nutr 133:2812–2819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Am J Enol Vitic 16:144–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harvey D (2000) Modern analytical chemistry. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA

  18. Wong SP, Leong LP, Koh JHW (2006) Food Chem 99:775–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Awika JM, Rooney LW, Wu XL, Prior RL, Cisneros-Zevallos L (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:6657–6662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang SY, Whiteman M, Peng ZF, Jenner A, Yong EL, Halliwell B (2004) Free Radic Biol Med 36:1575–1587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung KT, Wong TY, Huang YW, Lin Y (1998) Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 38:421–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dewanto V, Wu XZ, Adom KK, Liu RH (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:3010–3014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dewanto V, Wu XZ, Liu RH (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:4959–4964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the CRCG (The University of Hong Kong Committee on Research and Conference Grants), the Outstanding Young Researcher Award of the University of Hong Kong, and RGC (the Hong Kong Research Grants Council).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua-Bin Li.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM

(DOC 94 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, HB., Jiang, Y., Wong, CC. et al. Evaluation of two methods for the extraction of antioxidants from medicinal plants. Anal Bioanal Chem 388, 483–488 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1235-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1235-x

Keywords

Navigation