Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Towards low-carbon product architecture using structural optimization for lightweight

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon emission has become a recent global concern for green manufacturing. Production is one of the main sources of carbon emission. As the design of a product determines over 70 % of its life cycle costs, with extensive impacts on the environment, it is important to decrease the product carbon footprint in the product design stage. As the activity data is directly related to the mass of the product, the lightweight of product is a valid approach to low-carbon footprint. However, the existing lightweight design method primarily takes structure or material into consideration without the consideration of environmental factors. The product lightweight design under the low-carbon footprint constraint is proposed in this paper, which serves low-carbon footprint as an important benchmarking for product performance. This paper then presents a general lightweight design for product low-carbon footprint through structural optimization. The design of a cold heading machine is used to demonstrate the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/sustainablemanufacturing/

  2. EIA (2010) Annual energy review 2010. p. 38. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/archive/038410.pdf

  3. Int. Energy Agency (IEA) (2008) Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and Efficiency, Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Indicators_2008.pdf

  4. Council of the European Union, http://consilium.europa.eu/

  5. Neugebauer R (2011) Energy-efficient product and process innovations in production engineering. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 4(2):127–128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fysikopoulos A, Pastras G, Alexopoulos T, Chryssolouris G (2014) On a generalized approach to manufacturing energy efficiency. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(9–12):1437–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Galitsky C, Worrell E (2008) Energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities for the vehicle assembly industry: an energy star guide for energy and plant managers. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

  8. Apostolos F, Alexios P, Georgios P, Panagiotis S, George C (2013) Energy efficiency of manufacturing processes: a critical review. Procedia CIRP 7:628–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He B, Wang J, Huang S and Wang Y. Low-carbon product design for product life cycle. J Eng Design. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2015.1053437

  10. He B, Wang J, Deng ZQ (2015) Cost-constrained low-carbon product design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-6947-z

  11. Accord C (2009) Draft decision-/CP. 15. In Conference of the Parties to the L NFCC, Fifteenth Session, Copenhagen, 7: 18

  12. Bhandari M (2012) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, doi: 10.1002/9780470670590

  13. BSI PAS 2050 (2011) Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution

  14. He B, Deng ZQ, Huang S, Wang J (2014) Application of unascertained number for the integration of carbon footprint in conceptual design. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. doi:10.1177/0954405414539495

  15. Kajtaz M, Subic A, Takla M (2010) A collaborative FEA platform for rapid design of lightweight vehicle structures. Int J Veh Des 53(1):110–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jang GW, Yoon MS, Park JH (2010) Lightweight flatbed trailer design by using topology and thickness optimization. Struct Multi Optim 41(2):295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Louhichi B, Abenhaim GN, Tahan AS (2014) CAD/CAE integration: updating the CAD model after a FEM analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(1–4):391–400

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maier M, Siegel D, Thoben KD, Niebuhr N, Hamm C (2013) Transfer of natural micro structures to bionic lightweight design proposals. J Bionic Eng 10(4):469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Emmelmann C, Sander P, Kranz J, Wycisk E (2011) Laser additive manufacturing and bionics: redefining lightweight design. Phys Procedia 12:364–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao L, Ma J, Wang T, Xing D (2010) Lightweight design of mechanical structures based on structural bionic methodology. J Bionic Eng 7:224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Obradovic J, Boria S, Belingardi G (2012) Lightweight design and crash analysis of composite frontal impact energy absorbing structures. Compos Struct 94(2):423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marcelin JL (2008) Pseudo-constructal theory for shape optimization of mechanical structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(1–2):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Studer M, Ehrig F (2015) Numerical shape optimization as an approach to reduce material waste in injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6757-8

  24. Chen JX, Wu G (2013) Beetle forewings: Epitome of the optimal design for lightweight composite materials. Carbohydr Polym 91(2):659–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goede M, Stehlin M, Rafflenbeul L, Kopp G, Beeh E (2009) Super light car—lightweight construction thanks to a multi-material design and function integration. Eur Transp Res Rev 1(1):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakundarini N, Taha Z, Abdul-Rashid SH, Ghazila RAR (2013) Optimal multi-material selection for lightweight design of automotive body assembly incorporating recyclability. Mater Des 50:846–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chumrum P, Koga N, Premanond V (2015) Experimental investigation of energy and punch wear in piercing of advanced high-strength steel sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-6902-z

  28. Green SMF, Brooke NJ, McSaveney LG, Ingham JM (2011) Mixture design development and performance verification of structural lightweight pumice aggregate concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 23(8):1211–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin DS, Yang YS, Cao GR, Tian Y, Ruan ZY, An GP (1998) Forging machinery and finite element analysis. Beijing University of Technology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wen JB, He HB (2013) Numerical simulation and analysis of three dimensional flow field of a counter-rotating fan with various angles. Int J Control Autom 6(6):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, B., Tang, W., Huang, S. et al. Towards low-carbon product architecture using structural optimization for lightweight. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83, 1419–1429 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7676-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7676-z

Keywords

Navigation