Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic generation of in-process models based on feature working step and feature cutter volume

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 3D in-process model shows the intermediate shape of workpiece intuitively in different machining stages. Automatic generation of in-process models is one of the most important key technologies in 3D computer aided process planning (CAPP) system, which shortens modeling time and improves the accuracy of model expression. This paper describes implementation of an automatic generation of in-process models based on feature working steps (FWSs) and feature cutter volumes (FCVs). The principle is proposed to demonstrate the relationship between machining process information and in-process models. The expression and analysis of process route based on FWS is completed. And then two kinds of FCV constructions and instantiations are studied. One is parameterization for stable feature and the other is layering and reverse reconstruction for semi-stable feature. Two examples are presented to illustrate the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jasthi SRK, Rao PN, Tewari NK (1995) Studies on process plan representation in CAPP systems. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 8(3):173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanungo T, Haralick R, Dori D (1995) Understanding engineering drawings: a survey. Proceedings of 1st IARP Workshop on Graphics Recognition, pp 217–228

  3. Zhou X, Qiu Y, Hua G, Wang H, Ruan X (2007) A feasible approach to the integration of CAD and CAPP. Comput Aided Des 39(4):324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng Q, Hall FR, Liste PM (2000) Application and evaluation of VR-based CAPP system. J Mater Process Technol 107(1):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang S, Shi Y, Fan H, Huang R, Cao J (2010) Serial 3D model reconstruction for machining evolution of rotational parts by merging semantic and graphic process planning information. Comput Aided Des 42(9):781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi JC, Kim C, Kim JH (2002) A study of the progressive working of an electric product using a 3D Shape recognition method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(7):525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramana KV, Rao PVM (2004) Data and knowledge modeling for design-process planning integration of sheet metal components. J Intell Manuf 15(5):607–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghatrehnaby M, Arezoo B (2012) Automatic strip layout design in progressive dies. J Intell Manuf 23:661–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang R, Zhang S, Fan HT, Tao J (2011) A matching algorithm between precursory 3D process model and 2D working procedure drawing based on subgraph isomorphism. Sci China Technol Sci 54(7):1826–1832

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jerry Fuh YH, Chang CH, Melkanoff MA (1996) The development of an integrated and intelligent CAD/CAPP/CAFP environment using logic-based reasoning. Comput Aided Des 28(3):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu L, Liu WJ, Kang XM, Chen M (2003) A semi-intelligent processing–drawing generation system for 3D parts. Mech Eng 10:3–6 [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mohan LV, Shunmugam MS (2004) CAD approach for simulation of generation machining and identification of contact lines. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(7):717–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang ZY, Wu SF, Qin HB (2004) Transformation technology from part design model to blank model. Comput Integr Manuf Syst Beijing 10:620–624

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim YS, Wang E (2002) Recognition of machining features for cast then machined parts. Comput Aided Des 34(1):71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hatley J (2005) GibbsCAM tutorial, Version 2004. Schroff Development Corporation

  16. Albert M (2002) Getting to know knowledge-based machining. Mod Mach Shop 75(6):64–77

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu XW, He Q (2004) Striving for a total integration of CAD, CAPP, CAM and CNC. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 20(2):101–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao J, Zheng DT, Gindy N (2004) Extraction of machining features for CAD/CAM integration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24(7–8):573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hou M, Faddis TN (2006) Automatic tool path generation of a feature-based CAD/CAPP/CAM integrated system. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 19(4):350–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheen BT, You CF (2006) Machining feature recognition and tool-path generation for 3-axis CNC milling. Computer Aided Des 38(6):553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang M, Park SC (2008) An algorithm to extract machining volumes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36(9–10):942–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yifei T, Dongbo L, Changbo L, Minjian Y (2008) A feature-extraction-based process-planning system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(11–12):1192–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sadaiah M, Yadav DR, Mohanram PV, Radhakrishnan P (2002) A generative computer-aided process planning system for prismatic components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(10):709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianxun Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Chen, Z. & Yan, X. Automatic generation of in-process models based on feature working step and feature cutter volume. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71, 395–409 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5507-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5507-7

Keywords

Navigation