Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 48, Issue 10, pp 1591–1599 | Cite as

Non-fatal burden of disease due to mental disorders in the Netherlands

  • Joran Lokkerbol
  • Dirk Adema
  • Ron de Graaf
  • Margreet ten Have
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Aartjan Beekman
  • Filip Smit
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the disease burden due to 15 mental disorders at both individual and population level.

Methods

Using a population-based survey (Nemesis, N = 7,056) the number of years lived with disability per one million population were assessed. This was done with and without adjustment for comorbidity.

Results

At individual level, major depression, dysthymia, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, social phobia, eating disorder and schizophrenia are the disorders most markedly associated with health-related quality of life decrement. However, at population level, the number of affected people and the amount of time spent in an adverse health state become strong drivers of population ill-health. Simple phobia, social phobia, depression, dysthymia and alcohol dependence emerged as public health priorities.

Conclusions

From a clinical perspective, we tend to give priority to the disorders that exact a heavy toll on individuals. This puts the spotlight on disorders such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. However, from a public health perspective, disorders such as simple phobia, social phobia and dysthymia—which are highly prevalent and tend to run a chronic course—are identified as leading causes of population ill-health, and thus, emerge as public health priorities.

Keywords

Quality of life Public mental health Epidemiology Mental disorders Disease burden 

References

  1. 1.
    Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1996) The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. vol 1, Mass: Harvard School of Public Health, on behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Menken M, Munsat TL, Tolle JF (2000) The global burden of disease study: implications for neurology. Arch Neurol 57:418–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Begg SJ, Vos T, Barker B, Stanley L, Lopez AD (2008) Burden of disease and injury in Australia in the new millennium: measuring health loss from diseases, injuries and risk factors. Med J Australia 188:36–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mathers CD, Loncar D (2006) Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PloS Med 3(11):e442. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization (2006) Dollars, DALYs and Decisions. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization (2008) Mental Health Gap Action Programme: scaling up for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lancet Global Mental Health Group (2007) Scale up services for mental health: a call for action. Lancet 370:1241–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bijl RV, Van Zessen G, Ravelli A (1998) The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS): objectives and design. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 33:581–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization (1997) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), version 2.1, 12-months. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ter Smitten MH, Smeets RMW, van den Brink W (1998) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI),Version 2.1, 12-months (in Dutch). World Health Organization, Amsterdam/GenevaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wittchen HU (1994) Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res 28:57–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21:271–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): i. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 3:473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gafni A (1994) The standard gamble method: what is being measured and how it is interpreted. Health Serv Res 29:207–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andrews G, Sanderson K, Beard J (1998) Burden of disease: methods of calculating disability from mental disorder. Brit J Psychiatry 173:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hox JJ (2010) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Taylor and Francis Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walters SJ, Brazier JE (2005) Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res 14:1523–1532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smit F, Cuijpers P, Oostenbrink J, Batelaan N, De Graaf R, Beekman A (2006) Costs of nine common mental disorders: implications for curative and preventive psychiatry. J Ment Health Policy Econ 9:193–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Graaf R, Bijl RV, Spijker J, Beekman ATF, Vollebergh WAM (2003) Temporal sequencing of lifetime mood disorders in relation to comorbid anxiety and substance disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ESEMeD (2004) Disability and quality of life impact of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand 109(suppl):38–46Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Graaf R, Tuithof M, van Dorsselaer S, ten Have M (2012) Comparing the effects on work performance of mental and physical disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol: doi:10.1007/s00127-012-0496-7
  23. 23.
    Weehuizen R (2008) Mental capital: the economic significance of mental health. University of Maastricht, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saarni SI, Ari JS, Sintonen H, Pirkola S, Koskinen S, Aroma A, Lönnqvist J (2007) Impact of psychiatric disorders on health-related quality of life: general population survey. Brit J Psychiatry 190:326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bowie C, Beck S, Bevan G, Raftery J, Silverton F, Stevens A (1997) Estimating the burden of disease in an English region. J Public Health Med 19:87–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mathers CD, Vos T, Stevenson E, Begg SJ (2001) The burden of disease and injury in Australia. Bull World Health Organ 79:1076–1084PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vos T, Mathers CD (2000) The burden of mental disorders: a comparison of methods between the Australian burden of disease studies and the Global Burden of Disease study. Bull World Health Organ 78:427–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stouthard M, Essink-Bot M-L, Bonsel G, Barendregt J, Kramers P, Van de Water H, Gunning-Schepers M-L, Van der Maas P (1997) Disability weights for diseases in the Netherlands. Department of Public Health, Erasmus University, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gmel G, Gutjahr E, Rehm J (2003) How stable is the risk curve between alcohol and all-cause mortality and what factors influence the shape? A precision-weighted hierarchical meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 8:613–642Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rehm J, Room R, Monteiro M, Gmel G, Graham K, Rehn N, Sempos CT, Jernigan D (2003) Alcohol as a risk factor for global burden of disease. Eur Addict Res 9:157–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chisholm D, Rehm J, Van Ommeren M, Monteiro M (2004) Reducing the global burden of hazardous alcohol use: comparative cost-effectiveness analysis. J Stud Alcohol 65:782–793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Konnopka A, König H–H (2009) The health and economic consequences of moderate alcohol consumption in Germany 2002. Value Health 2:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pillai A, Nayak MB, Greenfield TK, Bond JC, Nadkarni A, Patel V (2012) Patterns of alcohol use, their correlates, and impact in male drinkers: a population-based survey from Goa India. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48(2):275–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Craig BM, Busschbach JJ, Salomon JA (2009) Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches. J Clin Epidemiol 62:296–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joran Lokkerbol
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dirk Adema
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ron de Graaf
    • 1
  • Margreet ten Have
    • 1
  • Pim Cuijpers
    • 2
  • Aartjan Beekman
    • 3
  • Filip Smit
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction)UtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Clinical PsychologyEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University and VU University Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations