Skip to main content
Log in

Micropropagation of mature British wild cherry

  • Original Research Papers
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shoot tips from accessions of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) selected from British woodland, and also theP. avium rootstock cvs. F12/1 and Charger, were successfully establishedin vitro, and most were easily micropropagated on Murashige and Skoog (MS)-based media. In one accession, adventitious shoots occasionally developed from the extrafloral nectaries positioned at the base of leaf petioles of the initial explants. Micropropagation of cv. Charger was improved by culture on a Quoirin and Lepoivre and Woody Plant-based medium, and by supplementing the medium with 1-phenyl-3-(1, 2, 3-thiadiazol-5yl)urea (thidiazuron). Poor shoot production by F12/1 on 1, 3, 5-trihydroxybenzene (phloroglucinol)-free media was not improved by up to 18 months of regular subculture. Study of cv. F12/1 showed that shoots produced on a MS-based medium with 1 mM phloroglucinol, 0.49 μM indolebutyric acid, 4.4 μM benzyladenine (BA) and 0.29 μM gibberellic acid (GA3), were easier to root over several subcultures than shoots produced on a similar medium with no GA3 and only 2.2 μM BA, but only in a rooting medium supplemented with 1 mM phloroglucinol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

benzyladenine

EDTA:

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

GA3 :

gibberellic acid

IBA:

indolebutyric acid

phloroglucinol:

1,3,5 - trihydroxybenzene

TDZ:

1-phenyl-3- (1,2,3,-thiadiazol-5yl)urea

References

  • Al Barazi Z & Schwabe WW (1985) Studies on possible internal factors involved in determining ease of rooting in cuttings ofPistacia vera andPrunus avium, cvs. Colt and F12/1. J. Hort. Sci. 60: 439–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancora G, Benvenuto E, Roselli G, Donini B & Cuozzo L. (1982) Micropropagation of cherry rootstock F12/1 clones originated from irradiation: the isolation of solid mutants. Riv. Ortoflorofrutt. It. 66: 231–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondi S, Diaz T, Iglesias I, Gamberini G & Bagni N (1990) Polyamines and ethylene in relation to adventitious root formation inPrunus avium shoot cultures. Physiol. Plant 78: 474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett C (1988)In vitro techniques for determining host resistance and susceptibility to bacterial canker. Ann. Rep. AFRC. Inst. Hort. Res. for 1987, 12

  • Genstat 5 Committee (1987) Genstat Reference Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani AKMO and Cahalan CM (1991) Propagation ofPrunus avium from root cuttings. Forestry 64: 403–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammatt N and Grant NJ (1993) Apparent rejuvenation of mature wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) during micropropagation. J. Plant Physiol. 141: 341–346

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammatt N (1994) Promotion by phloroglucinol of adventitious root formation in micropropagated shoots of adult wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Plant Growth Reg. 14: 127–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard BH, Jones OP & Vasek J (1989) Long-term improvement in the rooting of plum cuttings following apparent rejuvenation. J. Hort. Sci. 64: 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • James DJ & Thurbon IJ (1981) Phenolic compounds and other factors controlling rhizogenesisin vitro in the apple rootstocks M.9 and M.26. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 105:11–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones OP & Webster CA (1989) Improved rooting from conventional cuttings taken from micropropagated plants ofPyrus communis rootstocks. J. Hort. Sci. 64: 429–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd G & McCown LB (1981) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel,Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot culture. Comb. Proc. Intl. Plant Prop. Soc. 30: 421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks TR & Myers PE (1994) Physiological variability arising fromin vitro culture is induced by shoot selection and manipulation strategies. J. Hort. Sci. 69: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Németh G (1979) Benzyladenine-stimulated rooting in fruit tree rootstocks culturedin vitro. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 95: 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll F (1993) Genetic improvement of cherry for farm woodlands. Q.J. For. 87: 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Noiton D, Vine JH & Mullins MG (1992) Effects of serial subculturein vitro on the endogenous levels of indole-3-acetic acid and abscisic acid and rootability in microcuttings of ‘Jonathan’ apple. Plant Growth Reg. 11: 377–383

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ochatt SJ (1991) Strategies for plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of the recalcitrant fruit and farmwoodland speciesPrunus avium. J. Plant Physiol. 139: 155–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ochatt SJ & Caso OH (1984) Cultivoin vitro de ápices caulinares de portainjertos de frutales lenosos (Rosaceae). I. Micropropagatión de cerezos CV “Colt” y CL “712/1”. Investigaciones Agricolas 19: 241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor SN (1985a) The silviculture of wild cherry or gean (Prunus avium L.). Q.J. For. 79: 95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor SN (1985b) An evaluation of silvicultural options for broadleaved woodland. D. Phil. Thesis (unpublished). Department of Forestry, University of Oxford

  • Pryor SN (1988) The silviculture and yield of wild cherry. Forestry Commission Bulletin 75. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Quoirin M & Lepoivre P (1977) Improved medium forin vitro culture of Prunus sp. Acta Hort. 78: 437–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffaud J-L & Comu D (1981) Utilisation de la culturein vitro pour la multiplication de merisiers adultes (Prunus avium L.) sélectionnés en forêt. Agronomie 1: 633–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW & Cochran WG (1980) Statistical Methods, 6th Edition. Iowa State Univ. Press, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Snir I (1982)In vitro propagation of sweet cherry cultivars. HortScience 17: 192–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sriskandarajah S, Mullins MG & Nair Y (1982) Induction of adventitious rooting in vitro in difficult-to-propagate cultivars of apple. Plant Sci. Lett. 24: 1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watillon B, Kettmann R, Boxus P & Burny A (1991) Characterization of two gene transcripts modulated by cytokinins in micropropagated apple (Malus domestica [L.] Borkh) plantlets. Plant Physiol 96: 479–484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster CA & Jones OP (1989) Micropropagation of the apple rootstock M.9: effect of sustained subculture on apparent rejuvenationin vitro. J.Hort. Sci. 64: 421–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster CA & Jones OP (1992) Performance of field hedge and stoolbed plants of micropropagated dwarfing apple rootstock clones with different degrees of apparent rejuvenation. J. Hort. Sci. 67: 521–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PJ & Van Staden J (1990) Rhizocaline, rooting co-factors, and the concept of promoters and inhibitors of adventitious rooting — a review. Ann. Bot. 66: 479–490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HY & Schmidt H (1992) Untersuchungen zur Adventivsproßiregenerationin vitro bei Kirschen. II. Adventivsproßbildung anin vitro — Blättern verschiedenerPrunus avium-Idiotypen. Gartenbauwissenschaft 57: 7–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammatt, N., Grant, N.J. Micropropagation of mature British wild cherry. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 47, 103–110 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02318945

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02318945

Key words

Navigation