Skip to main content
Log in

Imaginary numbers are not real—The geometric algebra of spacetime

  • Part I. Invited Papers Dedicated To David Hestenes
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper contains a tutorial introduction to the ideas of geometric algebra, concentrating on its physical applications. We show how the definition of a “geometric product” of vectors in 2-and 3-dimensional space provides precise geometrical interpretations of the imaginary numbers often used in conventional methods. Reflections and rotations are analyzed in terms of bilinear spinor transformations, and are then related to the theory of analytic functions and their natural extension in more than two dimensions (monogenics), Physics is greatly facilitated by the use of Hestenes' spacetime algebra, which automatically incorporates the geometric structure of spacetime. This is demonstrated by examples from electromagnetism. In the course of this purely classical exposition many surprising results are obtained—results which are usually thought to belong to the preserve of quantum theory. We conclude that geometric algebra is the most powerful and general language available for the development of mathematical physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Hestenes, “Spin and uncertainty in the interpretation of quantum mechanics,”Am. J. Phys. 47(5), 399 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. T. Jaynes, “Scattering of light by free electrons,” in A. Weingartshofer and D. Hestenes, eds.,The Electron (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Hestenes, “Clifford algebra and the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” in J. S. R. Chisholm and A. K. Common, eds.,Clifford Algebras and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986), p. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Hestenes,New Foundations for Classical Mechanics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Hestenes, “A unified language for mathematics and physics,” in J. S. R. Chisholm and A. K. Common, eds.,Clifford Algebras and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Hestenes and G. Sobczyk,Clifford Algebra to Geometric Calculus (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Hesteness, “Vectors, spinors, and complex numbers in classical and quantum physics,”Am. J. Phys. 39, 1013 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Hestenes, “Observables, operators, and complex numbers in the Dirac theory,”J. Math. Phys. 16(3), 556 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Hestenes, “The design of linear algebra and geometry,”Acta Appl. Math. 23, 65 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Hestenes and R. Gurtler, “Local observables in quantum theory,”Am. J. Phys. 39, 1028 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Hestenes, “Local observables in the Dirac theory,”J. Math. Phys. 14(7), 893 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Hestenes, “Quantum mechanics from self-interaction,”Found. Phys. 15(1), 63 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Hestenes, “Thezitterbewegung interpretation of quantum mechanics,”Found. Phys. 20(10), 1213 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. de Broglie,La Réinterprétation de la Mécanique Ondulatoire (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. P. Feynman,The Character of Physical Law (British Broadcasting Corporation, London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. F. Gull, A. N. Lasenby, and C. J. L. Doran, “Electron paths, tunneling and diffraction in the spacetime algebra,”Found. Phys. 23(10) (1993).

  17. D. Hestenes, “Entropy and indistinguishability,”Am. J. Phys. 38, 840 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Hestenes, “Inductive inference by neural networks,” in G. J. Erickson and C. R. Smith, eds.,Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Science and Engineering (Vol. 2), (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Hestenes, “Modelling games in the Newtonian world,”Am. J. Phys. 60(8), 732 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Hestenes,Space-Time Algebra (Gordon & Breach, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Grassmann,Die Ausdehnungslehre (Berlin, 1862).

  22. H. Grassmann, “Der Ort der Hamilton'schen Quaternionen in der Ausdehnungslehere,”Math. Ann. 12, 375 (1877).

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. K. Clifford, “Applications of Grassmann's extensive algebra,”Am. J. Math. 1, 350 (1878).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. J. L. Doran, A. N. Lasenby, and S. F. Gull, “States and operators in the spacetime algebra,”Found. Phys. 23(9), 1239 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Halberstam and R. E. Ingram,The Mathematical Papers of Sir William Rowan Hamilton, Vol. III (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. W. Benn and R. W. Tucker,An Introduction to Spinors and Geometry (Adam Hilger, London, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. N. Lasenby, C. J. L. Doran, and S. F. Gull, “A multivector derivative approach to Lagrangian field theory,”Found. Phys. 23(10) (1993).

  28. J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman, “Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 21(3), 425 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman, “Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. N. Lasenby, C. J. L. Doran, and S. F. Gull, “Grassmann calculus, pseudoclassical mechanics and geometric algebra,”J. Math. Phys. 34(8), 3683 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. J. L. Doran, A. N. Lasenby, and S. F. Gull, “Grassmann mechanics, multivector derivatives and geometric algebra” in Z. Oziewicz, A. Borowiec, and B. Jancewicz, eds.,Spinors, Twistors and Clifford Algebras (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993), p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. N. Lasenby, C. J. L. Doran, and S. F. Gull, “2-Spinors, twistors and supersymmetry in the spacetime algebra,” in Z. Oziewicz, A. Borowiec, and B. Jancewicz, eds.,Spinors, Twistors and Clifford Algebras (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993), p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  33. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation (Freeman, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The title of this paper is inspired by David Hestenes, who is known to have a fondness for deliberate ambiguity.(1)

Supported by a SERC studentship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gull, S., Lasenby, A. & Doran, C. Imaginary numbers are not real—The geometric algebra of spacetime. Found Phys 23, 1175–1201 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883676

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883676

Keywords

Navigation