Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 367–397 | Cite as

The use of ecobehavioral assessment to identify naturally occurring effective procedures in classrooms serving students with autism and other developmental disabilities

  • Debra M. Kamps
  • Betsy R. Leonard
  • Erin P. Dugan
  • Brenda Boland
  • Charles R. Greenwood
Article

Abstract

A real need exists for the development of effective instructional procedures for students with autism and other developmental disabilities in community-based settings. The purpose of the present project was twofold: a) to conduct an ecobehavioral analysis of classroom instruction in order to provide a description of naturally occurring effective procedures; and b) to experimentally validate the effectiveness of those procedures across teachers and classrooms. Twenty-four subjects from six different classrooms participated in Study 1. An ecobehavioral analysis model was implemented with systematic observations to measure environmental effects on student performance. These observations, along with informal observations conducted by the experimenters, were used to provide data-based and qualitative descriptions of naturally occurring classroom procedures and events. Study 2 sought to experimentally determine functional relationships between the identified effective procedures from Study 1 and levels of student academic responding and learning. Twenty-one subjects from 5 classrooms participated in a series of single-subject designs to test the intervention procedures during small group instructional sessions. Intervention groups were characterized by a variety of media materials interspersed with verbal interactions, frequent rotations of materials, fast-pacing, group (choral) responding, and student-to-student interactions. Results, based on procedural checklist data and criterion-referenced assessments, indicated reliable replications across teachers and students for the identified naturally occurring effective procedures with increased student learning during interventions.

Key words

ecobehavioral assessment autism effective procedures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arreaga-Mayer, C. (1988, May). Confirming procedural effectiveness. In J. J. Carta (Chair).Selection and validation of classroom interventions using ecobehavioral analysis. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Association of Behavior Analysis, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risely, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.Google Scholar
  3. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986).Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984).Single case experimental designs (2nd Ed.) New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, W. K., & Wacker, D. P. (1989). Evaluation of tactile prompts with a student who is deaf, blind, and mentally retarded.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 93–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., & Ault, M. H. (1968). A method of integrating descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.Google Scholar
  7. Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example.Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.Google Scholar
  8. Blew, P. A., Schwartz, I. L., & Luce, S. C. (1985). Teaching functional community skills to autistic children using nonhandicapped peer tutors.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 337–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, E. G., & Darcy, M. (1990). Setting generality of peer modeling in children with autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 45–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carta, J. J. (1988, May).Selection and validation of classroom interventions using ecobehavioral analysis. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  12. Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., & Robinson, S. L. (1987). Application of an ecobehavioral approach to the evaluation of early intervention programs. In R. Prinz (Ed.),Advances in the behavioral assessment of children and families (Vol. 3), Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  13. Carta, J. J., & Greenwood, C. R. (1985). Eco-behavioral assessment: A methodology for expanding the evaluation of early intervention programs.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(2), 88–104.Google Scholar
  14. Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., & Kohler, F. (1986).Increasing teaching/learning efficiency in the mainstreaming of LD students: Discovery and validation of effective naturalistic instructional procedures. Washington, DC: Three year project funded by the Office of Special Education Programs.Google Scholar
  15. Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Schulte, D., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Terry, B. (1988).Code for instructional structure and student academic response: Mainstream version (MS-CISSAR). Kansas City, KS: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Bureau of Child Research, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  16. Charlop, M. H., Schreibman, L., Mason, J., & Vesey, W. (1983). Behavior-setting interactions of autistic children: A behavioral mapping approach to assessing classroom behaviors.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 357–359.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, D. H., & Speece, D. L. (1990). Instructional correlates of students' academic responses: Comparisons between at risk and control students.Early Education and Development, 4, 279–299.Google Scholar
  18. Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., & Hall, R. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring.Exceptional Children, 52 535–542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Deno, S. L., & Fuchs, L. S. (1987). Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving.Focus on Exceptional Children, 19, 1–16.Google Scholar
  20. Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Jones-Ault, M., & Gast, D. L. (1988). System of least prompts: A literature review of procedural parameters.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12(1), 28–40.Google Scholar
  21. Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 41–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Egel, A., Richman, G., & Loege, R. (1981). Normal peer models and autistic children's learning.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 3–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Favell, J., Favell, J., & McGinsey, J. (1978). Relative effectiveness and efficiency of group vs. individual training of severely retarded person.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 104–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldstein, H., & Mousetis, L. (1989). Generalized language learning by children with severe mental retardation: Effects of peers' expressive modeling.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 245–259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwood, C. R. (1988, May). Alternative approaches in developing procedures. In J. J. Carta (Chair),Selection and validation of classroom interventions using ecobehavioral analysis. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  26. Greenwood, C. R., & Carta, J. J. (1987). An ecobehavioral analysis of instruction within special education.Focus on Exceptional children, 19, 1–12.Google Scholar
  27. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., & Atwater, J. (in press). Ecobehavioral analysis in the classroom: Review and implications.Journal of Behavioral Education.Google Scholar
  28. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., & Arreaga-Mayer, C. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of classroom instruction. In S. Schroeder (Ed.),Ecobehavioral analysis and developmental disabilities: The twenty-first century (pp. 33–63). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  29. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. Heward, T. Heron, D. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.),Behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  30. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 371–383.Google Scholar
  31. Greenwood, C. R., Schulte, D., Kohler, F., Dinwiddie, G., & Carta, J. J. (1986). Assessment and analysis of eco-behavioral interaction in school settings. In R. J. Prinz (Ed.),Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families (Vol. 2, pp. 69–98). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  32. Guess, D., & Helmstetter, E. (1986). Skill cluster instruction and the individualized curriculum sequencing model. In R. H. Horner, L. H. Meyer, & H. D. Fredericks (Eds.),Education of learners with severe handicaps (pp. 221–248). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  33. Halle, J. W. (1987). Teaching language in the natural environment: An analysis of spontaneity.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 28–37.Google Scholar
  34. Haring, T. G., Breen, C., Pitts-Conway, V., Lee, M., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1987). Adolescent peer tutoring and special friend experiences.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 280–286.Google Scholar
  35. Hineline, P. N. (1986). Re-turning the operant-respondent distinction. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.),Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 55–79). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Horner, R., Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. (1988).Generalization and maintenance: Life style changes in applied settings. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  37. Hunt, P., Goetz, L., Alwell, M., & Sailor, W. (1986). Using an interrupted behavior chain strategy to teach generalized communication responses.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 196–204.Google Scholar
  38. Iwata, B., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–10.Google Scholar
  39. Kamps, D. (1989, September).Peer tutoring and small group instruction for students with autism. Presented at the CEC/CCBD Conference on Behavioral Disorders, Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
  40. Kamps, D., Carta, J. J., Delquadri, J. C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Terry, B., & Greenwood, C. R. (1989). School-based research and intervention. In C. R. Greenwood (Ed.), Special issue devoted to the Juniper Gardens Children's ProjectEducation and Treatment of Children,12, 359–390.Google Scholar
  41. Kamps, D., Leonard, B. R., & Greenwood, C. R. (in press). Ecobehavioral assessment of students with autism and developmental disabilities. In R. J. Prinz (Ed.),Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families. London: Kingsley.Google Scholar
  42. Kamps, D., Locke, P., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1989). Increasing academic skills of students with autism using fifth grade peers as tutors.Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 38–51.Google Scholar
  43. Koegel, R. L., O'Dell, M., & Dunlap, G. (1988). Producing speech use in nonverbal autistic children by reinforcing attempts.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 525–538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Krantz, P., Ramsland, S., & McClannahan, L. (1989). Conversational skills for autistic adolescents: An autistic peer as prompter.Behavioral Residential Treatment, 4, 171–189.Google Scholar
  45. Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55 3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. McEvoy, M. A., Nordquist, V. M., Twardosz, S., Heckaman, K. A., Wehby, J. H., & Denny, R. K. (1988). Promoting autistic children's peer interaction in an integrated early childhood setting using affection activities.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 193–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Meyer, L. H., Fox, A., Schermer, A., Ketelsen, D., Montan, N., Maley, K., & Cole, D. (1987). The effects of teacher intrusion on social play interactions between children with autism and their nonhandicapped peers.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 315–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mirenda, P. L., & Donnellan, A. M. (1986). Effects of adult interaction style on conversational behavior in students with severe communication problems.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 126–141.Google Scholar
  49. Patterson, G. R. (1974). A basis for identifying stimuli which control behaviors in natural settings.Child Development, 45, 900–911.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pearson, M., Pearson, A., Fenrick, N., & Greene, D. (1988). The implementation of sample, mand, and delay techniques to enhance the language of delayed children in group settings.Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 342–348.Google Scholar
  51. Repp, A. C., Felce, D., & Baron, L. E. (1988). Basing the treatment of Stereotypic and self-injurious behaviors on hypotheses of their causes.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 281–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Repp, A. C., Karsh, K. G., & Lenz, M. W. (1990). Discrimination training for persons with developmental disabilities: A comparison of the task demonstration model and the standard prompting hierarchy.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 43–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rincover, A., & Koegel, R. L. (1977).Research on the education of autistic children: Recent advances and future directions. Paper submitted to the National Society for Autistic Children, Professional Advisory Board and B. J. Freeman, Ph.D. (pp. 329–359).Google Scholar
  54. Schiefelbusch, R. L., & Greenwood, C. R. (1986).Research on the development of children from depriving environments. Washington, DC: Five-year, three component project (language, education, and risk control) program project funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
  55. Schreibman, L., & Koegel, R. (1981). A guideline for planning behavior modification programs for autistic children. In S. M. Turner, K. S. Calhoun & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of clinical behavior therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  56. Simpson, R. L.(1987). Public school integration of autistic pupils.Focus on Autistic Behavior, 1(6), 1–7.Google Scholar
  57. Stainback, W. & Stainback, S. (1989). Using qualitative data collection procedures to investigate supported education issues.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 271–277.Google Scholar
  58. Strain, P. S., Jamieson, B., & Hoyson, M. (1986). Learning experiences: An alternative program for preschoolers and parents: A comprehensive service system for the mainstreaming of autistic-like preschoolers. In C. J. Meisel (Ed.),Mainstreaming handicapped children: Outcomes, controversies, and new directions. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984).Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  60. Touchette, P. E., MacDonald, R. F., & Langer, S. N. (1985). A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior, 1, 245–250.Google Scholar
  61. Wahler, R. G. & Fox, J. (1981). Setting events in applied behavior analysis: Toward a conceptual and methodological expansion.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 327–338.Google Scholar
  62. Whorton, D., Thibadeau, S. F., McGrale, J. E., Walker, D., Rotholz, D., & Sasso, G. M. (1986, May).The use of peers and group teaching practices as alternative educational strategies with autistic and developmentally disabled youth. Symposium presented at the 12th Annual Conference of The Association for Applied Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debra M. Kamps
    • 1
  • Betsy R. Leonard
    • 2
  • Erin P. Dugan
    • 2
  • Brenda Boland
    • 3
  • Charles R. Greenwood
    • 4
  1. 1.Autism Research Project, Juniper Gardens Children's Project (JGCP)University of KansasUSA
  2. 2.Autism Research Project, JGCPUSA
  3. 3.Kansas Public School DistrictKansas City
  4. 4.University of KansasUSA

Personalised recommendations