Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of potato tubers with a growth promotingPseudomonas sp.: Plant growth responses and bacterium distribution in the rhizosphere

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rifampicin-nalidixic acid resistant mutants of a plant growth promotingPseudomonas sp., strain PsJN, were evaluated for their ability to stimulate in vitro growth of potato. Two mutant strains, MFE (a consistent growth promoter), and IIM15 (an inconsistent growth promoter), were selected for root colonization study. Root colonization of potato plants was consistently greater with MFE than with IIM15. The population density of indigenous bacteria on the root surface of potato plants inoculated with strain MFE was significantly lower as compared to non-bacterized controls and to the plants bacterized with strain IIM15. Soil sterilization did not affect plant growth in any of the treatments. Bacterization of seed tubers with strain MFE stimulated plant emergence and root development in the field, during the first two weeks after planting. Bacterized plants also formed stolons and tubers earlier and had increased yields of commercial size tubers (≥55 mm) as compared to non-bacterized controls. Root colonization by strain MFE was positively correlated with plant growth stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahme J B, and Schroth M N 1987 Spatial-temporal colonization patterns of a rhizobacterium on underground organs of potato. Phytopatholgy 77, 1093–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker R 1968 Mechanisms of biological control of soilborne pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 6, 263–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker A W and Schippers B 1987 Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere in relation to potato yield reduction andPseudomonas spp.-mediated growth stimulation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker P A H M, Bakker A W, Geels F P, Lamers J G and Schippers B 1989 Increase of potato tuber yield in short rotations of potato by seed tuber treatments with fluorescentPseudomonas spp.In Effects of Crop Rotation on Potato Production in Temperate zones. Eds. J Vos, C D Van Loon and G J Bollen. pp 163–170. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker P A H M, Bakker A W, Marugg J D, Weisbeek P J and Schippers B 1987 A bioassay for studying the role of siderophores in potato growth stimulation byPseudomonas spp. in short potato rotation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M E 1972 Plant growth substances produced by microorganisms of soil and rhizosphere. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 35, 443–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M E 1974 Seed and root bacterization. Annu. Rev. Phytopathology 12, 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr T J and Caesar A 1984 Beneficial plant bacteria. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr T J, Schroth M N, and Suslow T V 1978 Increased potato yields by treatment of seed pieces with specific strains ofPseudomonas fluorescens andP. putida. Phytopathology 68, 1377–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison J 1988 Plant beneficial bacteria. Biotechnology 6, 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund E 1970 Secondary effects of some pseudomonads in the rhizoplane of peat-grown cucumber plants. Acta Agric. Scandinavica Suppl. 17, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommel M I, Nowak J and Lazarovits G 1991 Growth enhancement and developmental modifications of in vitro growth potato (Solanum tuberosum spp.tuberosum) as affected by a non-fluorescentPseudomonas sp. Plant Physiol. 96, 928–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie W J and Echandi E 1983 Rhizobacteria: Influence of cultivar and soil type on plant growth and yield of potato. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapulnik Y 1991 Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria.In Plant Roots The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp 719–729. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavimandan S K and Gaur A C 1971 Effect of seed inoculation withPseudomonas sp. on phosphate uptake and yield sof maize. Curr. Sci. 40, 439–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • King E O, Ward M K and Raney D E 1954 Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44, 301–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein D A, Salzwedel J L and Dazzo F B 1990 Microbial colonization of plant roots.In Biotechnology of Plant-Microbe Interactions. Eds. J P Nakas and C Hagedorn. pp 189–225. McGraw-Hill, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J W, Scher F M, Laliberté M, and Tipping B 1986 Emergence-promoting rhizobacteria: Description and implications for agriculture.In Iron, Siderophores and Plant Diseases. Ed. T R Swimburne. pp 155–164. Plenum, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J W, Scher F M, Laliberté M and Zaleska I 1985 Measuring the spermosphere colonizing capacity (spermosphere competence) of bacterial inoculants. Can. J. Microbiol. 31, 926–929.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J W and Schroth M N 1978 Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Plant Path. Bact. Angers. pp 879–882.

  • Kloepper J W and Schroth M N 1981 Relationship of in vitro antibiosis of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to plant growth and the displacement of root microflora. Phytopathology 71, 1020–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J W, Schroth M N and Miller T D 1980 Effect of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathology 70, 1078–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J W, Zablotowicz R M, Tipping E M and Lifshitz R 1991 Plant growth promotion mediated by bacterial rhizosphere colonizers.In The Rhizosphere and Plant Growth. Eds. D L Keister and P B Cregan. pp 315–326. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parke J L 1991 Root colonization by indigenous and introduced microorganisms.In The Rhizosphere and Plant Growth. Eds. D L Keister and P B Cregan. pp 33–42. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy M S 1991 Biological control of plant diseases.In Proceedings of the Workshop on Biological Control of Pests in Canada, October, 1990. Ed., A S McClay. pp 33–41. Alberta Environmental Centre, Vegerville, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneh B, Dupler M, Elad Y and Baker R 1984 Chlamydospore germination ofFusarium oxysporum f. sp.cucumerinum as affected by fluorescent and lytic bacteria from aFusarium suppressive soil. Phytopathology 74, 1115–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow T V 1982 Role of root colonizing bacteria on plant growth.In Phytopathogenic Prokaryotes. Eds. M S Mount and G H Lacy. pp 187–223. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow T V and Schroth M N 1982 Rhizobacteria on sugar beets: Effects of seed application and root colonization on yield. Phytopathology 72, 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipps J M and Lynch J M 1986 The influence of the rhizosphere on crop productivity. Adv. Microbiol. Ecol. 9, 187–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu G W and Gross D C 1986 Field evaluation of the interactions among fluorescent pseudomonads,Erwinia carotovora, and potato yields. Phytopathology 76, 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frommel, M.I., Nowak, J. & Lazarovits, G. Treatment of potato tubers with a growth promotingPseudomonas sp.: Plant growth responses and bacterium distribution in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 150, 51–60 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00779175

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00779175

Key words

Navigation