Abstract
The non-commutativity and the non-associativity of the composition law of the non-colinear velocities lead to an apparent paradox, which in turn is solved by the Thomas rotation. A 3×3 parametric, unimodular and orthogonal matrix elaborated by Ungar is able to determine the Thomas rotation. However, the algebra involved in the derivation of the Thomas rotation matrix is overwhelming. The aim of this paper is to present a direct derivation of the Thomas angle as the angle between the composite vectors of the non-colinear velocities, thus obtaining a simplicity with which the rotation can be expressed. This allows the formulation of an alternative to the statement related to the necessity of the Thomas rotation of the Cartesian axes by the statement implying the necessity of the rotation of the direct (inverse) relativistic composite velocity to coincide with the inverse (direct) relativistic composite velocity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. H. Thomas, “The motion of the spinning electron,”Nature 117, 514 (1926).
L. H. Thomas, “The kinematics of an electron with an axis,”Phil. Mag. 3, 1–22 (1927).
L. H. Thomas, “Recollections of the discovery of the Thomas precessional frequency,”AIP Conference Proceedings, No. 95 (High Energy Spin Physics), G. M. Bunce, ed. (Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1982), pp. 4-12.
A. A. Ungar, “The relativistic velocity composition paradox and the Thomas rotation,”Found. Phys. 19, 1385–1396 (1989).
G. P. Sastry, “Is Length contraction really paradoxical?,”Am. J. Phys. 55, 943–945 (1987).
C. I. Mocanu, “Some difficulties within the framework of relativistic electrodynamics,”Arch. Elektrotech. 69, 97–110 (1986).
A. A. Ungar, “Thomas rotation and the parametrization of the Lorentz transformation group,”Found. Phys. Lett. 1, 57–89 (1988).
A. A. Ungar, “The Thomas rotation formalism underlying a non-associative group structure for relativistic velocities,”Appl. Math. Lett. 1, 403–405 (1988).
A. A. Ungar, “The relativistic non-commutative non-associative group of velocities and the Thomas rotation,”Results in Mathematics 16, 168–179 (1989).
A. A. Ungar, “Axiomatic approach to the non-associative group of relativistic velocities,”Found Phys. Lett. 2, 199–203 (1989).
A. A. Ungar, “Weakly associative groups,”Results in Mathematics 17, 149–168 (1990).
A. A. Ungar, “Thomas precession and its associated group - like structure,”Am. J. Phys. 54, 824–834 (1991).
A. A. Ungar, “Quasidirect product groups and the Lorentz transformation group,” in T. M. Rassias, ed.Constantin Caratheodory: An International Tribute (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), pp. 1378–1392.
A. A. Ungar, “Successive Lorentz transformations of the electromagnetic field,”Found. Phys. 21, 569–589 (1991).
A. Einstein,Sidelights on relativity (Methuen, London, 1922).
R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, M. Sands,The Feynman Lectures (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1964), Vol. II, Sec. 17-4.
M. C. Møller,The Theory of Relativity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952).
W. Rindler,Special Relativity (Oliver & Boyd, London, 1986).
S. Ben-Menahem, “The Thomas precession and velocity space curvature,”J. Math. Phys. 27, 1234–1296 (1986).
S. Ben-Menahem, “Wigner rotation revisited,”Am. J. Phys. 53, 62–66 (1985).
S. Dencoff and D. R. Inglis, “On the Thomas precession of accelerated axes,”Phys. Rev. 50, 784 (1936).
G. P. Fisher, “The Thomas precession,”Am. J. Phys. 40, 1772–1781 (1972).
W. H. Furry, “Lorentz transformation and the Thomas precession,”Am. J. Phys. 23, 517–525 (1955).
A. C. Hirshfeld and Metzger, “A simple formula for combining rotations and Lorentz boosts,”Am. J. Phys. 54, 550–552 (1986).
E. G. P. Rowe, “The Thomas precession,”Eur. J. Phys. 5, 40–45 (1984).
N. Salingaros, “The Lorentz group and the Thomas precession: Exact results for the product of two boosts,”J. Math. Phys. 27, 157–162 (1986); also “Erratum: The Lorentz,J. Math. Phys. 29, 1265 (1988).
David Shelupsky, “Derivation of the Thomas precession formula,”Am. J. Phys. 35, 650–651 (1967).
Thomas Phipps,Heretical Verities: Mathematical Themes in Physical Description (Classical Non-Fiction Library, Box 926 Urbana, Illinois 61801, 1986).
M. E. Noz and Y. S.Kim, Special Relativity and Quantum Theory (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mocanu, C.I. On the relativistic velocity composition paradox and the Thomas rotation. Found Phys Lett 5, 443–456 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690425
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690425