Skip to main content
Log in

Piagetian tasks as readiness measures in mathematics instruction: A critical review

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to synthesize the research on the relationship between performance on Piagetian tasks of concrete operations and performance on mathematics learning tasks in order to determine whether the Piagetian tasks make useful readiness measures. The research consistently indicates that, while there is a positive correlation between performance on Piagetian tasks and mathematics achievement, many school mathematics tasks can be mastered by children who have not yet developed the reasoning abilities measured by Piagetian tasks. This does not diminish the validity of Piaget's theory, but rather suggests that the kinds of reasoning processes identified by Piaget are not essential in solving many school mathematics tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adi H.: 1978, ‘Intellectual development and reversibility of thought in equation solving’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 9, 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey T. G.: 1974, ‘Linear measurement in the elementary school’, Arithmetic Teacher 21, 520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J.: 1979, ‘The relationships among the development of counting, number conservation, and basic arithmetic abilities’ (Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1979), Dissertation Abstracts International 39, 6640A–6641A (University Microfilms No. 7910732).

  • Bearison D. J.: 1969, ‘Role of measurement operations in the acquisition of conservation’, Developmental Psychology 1, 653–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearison D. J.: 1975, ‘Induced versus spontaneous attainment of concrete operations and their relationship to school achievement’, Journal of Educational Psychology 67, 576–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbard, D. A.: 1978, ‘The concept of length measurement in young children’, Paper presented at the 56th annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematies, San Diego, California.

  • Carpenter T. P.: 1975, ‘The performance of first-and second-grade children on liquid conservation and measurement problems employing equivalence and order relations’, in L. P.Steffe (ed.), Research on Mathematical Thinking of Young Children, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter T. P.: 1980, ‘Research in cognitive development’, in R. J.Shumway (ed.), Research in Mathematics Education, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case R.: 1978a, ‘A developmentally based theory and technology of instruction’, Review of Educational Research 48, 439–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case R.: 1978b, ‘Intellectual development from birth to adulthood: A neo-Piagetian interpretation’, in R. S.Siegler (ed.), Children's Thinking: What Develops? Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cathcart W. G.: 1974, ‘The correlation of selected nonmathematical measures with mathematics achievement’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 5, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland R. W.: 1979, How Children Learn Mathematics (3rd edn.), Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Days H. C., Wheatley G. H., and Kulm G.: 1979, ‘Problem structure, cognitive level, and problem-solving performance’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaVries R.: 1974, ‘Relationships among Piagetian, IQ, and achievement assessments’, Child Development 45, 746–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrovsky L., and Almy M.: 1975, ‘Early conservation as a predictor of arithmetic achievement’, The Journal of Psychology 91, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodwell P. C.: 1961, ‘Children's understanding of number concepts: Characteristics of an individual and of a group test’, Canadian Journal of Psychology 15, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodwell P. C.: 1962, ‘Relation between the understanding of the logic of classes and of cardinal number in children’, Canadian Journal of Psychology 16, 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind D.: 1976, Child Development and Education: A Piagetian Perspective, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell J. H.: 1972, ‘An analysis of cognitive-developmental sequences’, Genetic Psychology Monographs 86, 279–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyberg P. S.: 1966, ‘Cognitive development in Piagetian terms in relation to school attainment’, Journal of Educational Psychology 57, 164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furth H. and Wachs H.: 1974, Thinking Goes to School, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano G. and Ito Y.: 1965, ‘Development of length measuring behavior’, Japanese Journal of Psychology 36, 184–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert J.: 1979, The effect of cognitive development on first-grade children's ability to learn linear measurement concepts’ (Tech. Rep. No. 506). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert J.: 1981, ‘Cognitive development and learning linear measurement’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 12, 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert J., Carpenter T. P., and Moser J. M.: 1982, ‘Cognitive development and children's solutions to verbal arithmetic problems’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 13, 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett K. D.: 1974, ‘A study of the relationship between Piagetian class inclusion tasks and the ability of first grade children to do missing addend computation and verbal problems (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1973), Dissertation Abstracts International 34, 6259A-6260A (University Microfilms No. 74–8376).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, M.: 1971, ‘A study of the status of conservation ability in relationship to arithmetic achievement’ (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1979), Dissertation Abstracts International 31, 3341A (University Microfilms No. 71-00, 425).

  • Kaufman A. S. and Kaufman N. L.: 1972, ‘Tests built from Piaget's and Gesell's tasks as predictors of first grade achievement’, Child Development 43, 521–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc J. F.: 1971, ‘The performances of first grade children in four levels of conservation of numerousness and three I.Q. groups when solving arithmetic subtraction problems’ (Technical Report No. 171), Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R. A. (ed.).: 1973, Cognitive Psychology and the Mathematics Laboratory: Papers from a Symposium, ERIC/SMEAC, Columbus, Ohio.

  • Lovell K.: 1972, ‘Intellectual growth and understanding mathematics’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 3, 164–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunzer E. A., Dolan T., and Wilkinson J. E.: 1976, ‘The effectiveness of measures of operativity, language, and short-term memory in the prediction of reading and mathematical understanding’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michacls E. R.: 1977, ‘Acquisition order of number conservation and the arithmetic logic of addition and subtraction’, (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1976), Dissertation Abstracts International 37, 4116B-4117B (University Microfilms No. 77–1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller S. A.: 1980, ‘Assessment of conservation of number: An attempt to enhance ecological validity and diagnostic sensitivity’, Genetic Psychology Monographs 101, 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mpiangu B. D. and Gentile R. J.: 1975, ‘Is conservation of number a necessary condition for mathematical understanding?’, Journal for Research in Mathematies Education 6, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neison, R. J.: 1970, ‘An investigation of a group test based on Piaget's concepts of number and length conservation and its ability to prediet first grade arithmetic achievement’, (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1969), Dissertation Abstracts International 30, 3644A (University Microfilms No. 70-3948).

  • Pennington B. F., Wallach I., and Wallach M. A.: 1980, ‘Nonconservers use and understanding of number and arithmetic’, Genetic Psychology Monographs 101, 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J.: 1952, The Child's Conception of Number, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J.: 1964, ‘Development and learning’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J.: 1970, ‘Pisger's theory’, in P.Mussen (ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J.: 1971 Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child, Viking Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J., Inhelder B., and Szeminska A.: 1960, The Child's Conception of Geometry, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohr, J. A. G.: 1973, ‘The relationship of the ability to conserve on Piagetian tasks to achievement in mathematics’ (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1973), Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 2398A (University Microfilms No. 73-27, 743).

  • Schwebel M. and Raph J. (eds.).: 1973, Piaget in the Classroom, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, H.: 1980, ‘Language and mathematics-in acquisition’, Paper presented at the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Berkeley, California.

  • Smith, G. J.: 1974, ‘The development of a survey instrument for first grade mathematics based on selected Piagetian tasks’, (Doctoral dissertation, University of Montana, 1973), Dissertation Abstracts International 34, 7056A (University Microfilms No. 74-11,637).

  • Sohns, M. L.: 1974, ‘A comparison between certain Piagetian logical thinking tasks and the subtraction ability of first, second, and third grade children’, in G. I. Lubin, J. F. Magary, and M. K. Poulsen (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Interdisciplinary Seminar: Paigetian Theory and its Implications for the Helping Profession, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

  • Steffe L. P.: 1970, ‘Differential performance of first-grade children when solving arithmetic addition problems’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1, 144–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe L. P.: 1976, ‘On a model for teaching young children mathematics’, in A. R.Osborne (ed.), Models for Learning Mathematics, ERIC/SMEAC, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe L. P. and Johnson D. C.: 1971, ‘Problem solving performances of first-grade children’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2, 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe L. R., Spikes W. C., and Hirstein J. J.: 1976, Summary of Quantitative Comparisons and Class Inclusion as Readiness Variables for Learning First Grade Arithmetical Content, The Georgia Center for the Study of Learning and Teaching Mathematics, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taloumis T.: 1979, ‘Scores on Plagetian area tasks as predictors of achievement in mathematies over a four-year period’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10, 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth B. J.: 1978, Piaget for the Classroom Teacher, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagman H. G.: 1975, ‘The child's conception of area measure’, in M. F.Rosskopf (ed.), Children's Mathematical Concepts: Six Piagetian Studies in Mathematics Education, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley G.: 1970, ‘Conservation, cardination, and counting as factors in mathematics achievement’, in I. J.Athey and D. O.Rubadeau (eds.), Educational Implications of Piaget's Theory, Blaisdell, Waltham, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill J. F.: 1970, ‘The place of structured experience in early cognitive development’, Interchange 1, 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, L. R. W.: 1978, ‘The relationships between children's ability to compare substance and number and their ability to solve addition and subtraction problems for missing place-holders’ (Doctoral dissertation, North Texas State University, 1977), Dissertation Abstracts International 38, 4006A (University Microfilms No. 77-29, 579).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T.P. Piagetian tasks as readiness measures in mathematics instruction: A critical review. Educ Stud Math 13, 329–345 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311247

Keywords

Navigation