Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 169, Issue 3, pp 249–258 | Cite as

Chemical communication in heliothine moths

I. Antennal receptor neurons encode several features of intra- and interspecific odorants in the male corn earworm moth Helicoverpa zea
  • Tor J. Almaas
  • Thomas A. Christensen
  • Hanna Mustaparta


  1. 1.

    Responses of single olfactory receptor neurons to pheromones were recorded with tungsten microelectrodes on the antennae of male Helicoverpa (Heliothis) zea. Recordings were obtained from the male specific sensilla trichodea type 1.

  2. 2.

    More than half (49/91 units) could be classified as olfactory receptor neurons, 35 of which were selective for pheromone components of the heliothine moths H. zea and Heliothis virescens. The majority (31/35) were most responsive to the principal component (Z)-11-hexadecenal (Z11-16∶AL). The other 4 were tuned to (Z)-9-tetradecenal (Z9-14∶AL), which is a pheromone component in the sympatric species H. virescens, and also interrupts attraction of H. zea males.

  3. 3.

    The specificity and sensitivity of these neurons were similar to the corresponding neurons in H. virescens, suggesting homologous populations of neurons in the two species. No other neurons selective for other pheromone compounds were identified.

  4. 4.

    Receptor neurons of both types (tuned to Z11-16∶AL and Z9-14∶AL respectively) showed variations in temporal response characteristics. Some responses showed a pronounced phasic spiking component, a rapid decay, and return to background activity after stimulation. Other responses were more prolonged, far outlasting the stimulation period. Phasic neurons also followed short, rapid stimulus pulses better than tonic neurons, suggesting that they may encode different features of an intermittent pheromone plume.


Key words

Helicoverpa (Heliothis) zea Single cell recordings Temporal coding Pheromones Interspecific inhibitor (Z)-11-hexadecenal (Z)-9-tetradecenal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Almaas TJ, Mustaparta H (1990) Pheromone reception in the tobacco budworm moth, Heliothis virescens. J Chem Ecol 16:1331–1347Google Scholar
  2. Almaas TJ, Mustaparta H (1991) Heliothis virescens: Response characteristics of receptor neurons in sensilla trichodea type 1 and type 2. J Chem Ecol 17:953–972Google Scholar
  3. Baker TC, Hansson BS, Löfstedt C, Löfquist J (1988) Adaptation of antennal neurons in moths is associated with cessation of pheromone-mediated upwind flight. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:9826–9830Google Scholar
  4. Callahan PS (1969) The exoskeleton of the corn earworm moth, Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with special reference to the sensilla as polytubular dielectric arrays. Research Bulletin 54: University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Station. 105 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter JE, Pair SD, Sparks AN (1984) Trapping of different noctuid moth species by one trap baited with two lures. J Georgia Entomol Soc 19:120–124Google Scholar
  6. Christensen TA, Hildebrand JG (1988) Frequency coding by central olfactory neurons in the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. Chem Senses 13:123–130Google Scholar
  7. Christensen TA, Mustaparta H, Hildebrand JG (1989) Discrimination of sex pheromone blends in the olfactory system of the moth. Chem Senses 14:463–477Google Scholar
  8. Christensen TA, Geoffrion SC, Hildebrand JG (1990) Physiology of interspecific chemical communication in Heliothis moths. Physiol Entomol 15:275–283Google Scholar
  9. Christensen TA, Mustaparta H, Hildebrand JG (1991) Chemical communication in heliothine moths. II. Central processing of intra- and interspecific olfactory messages in the male corn earworm moth Helicoverpa zea. J Comp Physiol A 169:259–274Google Scholar
  10. Grant AJ, O'Connel RJ, Hammond AM Jr (1988) A comparative study of pheromone perception in two species of Noctuid moths. J Insect Behav 1:75–96Google Scholar
  11. Grant AJ, Mankin RW, Mayer MS (1989a) Neurophysiological responses of pheromone-sensitive receptor neurons on the antenna of Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) to pulsed and continous stimulation regimens. Chem Senses 14:449–462Google Scholar
  12. Grant AJ, Mayer MS, Makin RW (1989b) Responses from sensilla on the antennae of male Heliothis zea to its major pheromone component and two analogs. J Chem Ecol 15:2625–2634Google Scholar
  13. Haile DG, Snow JW, Goodenough JL (1973) Reduced captures of tobacco budworm and corn earworm males in the electric grid traps baited simultaneously with virgin females of both species. J Econ Entomol 66:739–740Google Scholar
  14. Hallberg E (1981) Fine-structural characteristics of the antennal sensilla of Agrotis segetum (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Cell Tissue Res 218:209–218Google Scholar
  15. Hansson BS, Löfstedt C, Löfqvist J. Hallberg E (1986) Spatial arrangement of different types of pheromone-sensitive sensilla in a male moth. Naturwissenschaften 73:269–270Google Scholar
  16. Jefferson RN, Rubin RE, McFarland SU, Shorey HH (1970) Sex pheromones of Noctuid moths. XXII. The external morphology of the antennae of Trichoplusia ni, Heliothis zea, Prodenia or-nitogalli, and Spodoptera exigua. Ann Entomol Soc Am 63:1227–1238Google Scholar
  17. Kafka WA (1970) Molekulare Wechselwirkungen bei der Erregung einzelner Riechzellen. Z Vergl Physiol 70:105–143Google Scholar
  18. Kaissling K-E (1986a) Temporal characteristics of pheromone receptor cell responses in relation to orientation behaviour of moths. In: Payne TL, Birch MC, Kennedy CEJ (eds) Mechanisms in insect olfaction. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp 193–199Google Scholar
  19. Kaissling K-E (1986b) Chemo-electrical transduction in insect olfactory receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci 9:121–145Google Scholar
  20. Kehat M, Gothilf S, Dunkelblum E, Greenberg S (1980) Field evaluation of female sex pheromone components of the cotton bollworm, Heliothis armigera (Hübner). Entomol Exp Appl 27:188–193Google Scholar
  21. Kehat M, Dunkelblum E (1990) Behavioral responses of male Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) moths in a flight tunnel to combinations of components identified from female sex pheromone glands. J Insect Behav 3:75–83Google Scholar
  22. Klun JA, Plimmer JR, Bierl-Leonhardt BA (1979) Trace chemicals: The essence of sexual communication systems in Heliothis species. Science 204:1328–1330Google Scholar
  23. Klun JA, Plimmer JR, Bierl-Leonhardt BA, Sparks AN, Primiani M, Chapman OL, Lee GH, Lepone G (1980a) Sex pheromone chemistry of female corn earworm moth, Heliothis zea. J Chem Ecol 6:165–175Google Scholar
  24. Klun JA, Bierl-Leonhardt BA, Plimmer JR, Sparks AN, Primiani M, Chapman OL, Lepone G, Lee GH (1980b) Sex pheromone chemistry of the female tobacco budworm moth, Heliothis virescens. J Chem Ecol 6:177–183Google Scholar
  25. Lopez JD jr., Witz JA (1988) Influence of Heliothis virescens sex pheromone dispensers on captures of H. zea males in pheromone traps relative to distance and wind direction. J Chem Ecol 14:265–276Google Scholar
  26. Lucas P, Renou M (1989) Responses to pheromone compounds in Mamestra suasa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) olfactory neurons. J Insect Physiol 35:837–845Google Scholar
  27. Meng LZ, Wu CH, Wicklein M, Kaissling K-E, Bestmann HJ (1989) Number and sensitivity of three types of pheromone receptor cells in Antheraea pernyi and A. polyphemus. J Comp Physiol A 165:139–146Google Scholar
  28. Murlis J, Jones CD (1981) Fine-scale structure of odour plumes in relation to insect orientation to distant pheromone and other attractant sources. Physiol Entomol 6:71–86Google Scholar
  29. Mustaparta H, Angst M, Lanier GN (1977) Responses of single receptor neurons in the pine engraver beetle Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone ipsdienol and the aggregation inhibitor, ipsenol. J Comp Physiol 121:343–347Google Scholar
  30. Mustaparta H, Angst M, Lanier GN (1980) Receptor discrimination of enantiomers of the aggregation pheromone ipsdienol, in two species of Ips. J Chem Ecol 6:689–701Google Scholar
  31. Nesbitt BF, Beevor PS, Hall DR, Lester R (1979) Female sex pheromone components of the cotton bollworm, Heliothis armigera. J Insect Physiol 25:535–541Google Scholar
  32. Pope MM, Gaston LK, Baker TC (1984) Composition, quantification, and periodicity of sex pheromone volatiles from individual Heliothis zea females. J Insect Physiol 30:943–945Google Scholar
  33. Priesner E (1979a) Specificity studies on pheromone receptors of noctuid and tortricid Lepidoptera. In: Ritter FJ (ed) Chemical ecology: odour communication in animals. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 57–71Google Scholar
  34. Priesner E (1979b) Progress in the analysis of pheromone receptor systems. Ann Zool Ecol Anim 11:533–546Google Scholar
  35. Raina AK, Klun JA, Lopez JD, Leonhardt BA (1986) Female sex pheromone of Heliothis phloxiphaga (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Chemical identification, male behavioral response in the flight tunnel, and field tests. Environ Entomol 15:931–935Google Scholar
  36. Raina AK, Stadelbacher EA, Ridgway RL (1989) Comparison of sex pheromone composition and pheromone-mediated male behavior of laboratory-reared and wild Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Chem Ecol 15:1259–1265Google Scholar
  37. Roach SH (1975) Heliothis zea and Heliothis virescens: Moth activity as measured by blacklight and pheromone traps. J Economic Entomol 68:17–21Google Scholar
  38. Roelofs WL, Hill AS, Cardé RT, Baker TC (1974) Two sex pheromone components of the tobacco budworm moth, Heliothis virescens. Life Sci 14:1555–1562Google Scholar
  39. Rumbo ER, Kaissling K-E (1989) Temporal resolution of odour pulses by three types of pheromone receptor cells in Antheraea polyphemus. J Comp Physiol A 165:281–291Google Scholar
  40. Shaver TN, Lopez JD jr., Hartstack AW jr. (1982) Effects of pheromone components and their degradation products on the response of Heliothis spp. to traps. J Chem Ecol 8:755–762Google Scholar
  41. Steinbrecht RA (1973) Der Feinbau olfaktorischer Sensillen des Scidenspinners (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Rezeptorfortsätze und reizleitender Apparat. Z Zellforsch 139:533–565Google Scholar
  42. Teal PEA, Heath RR, Tumlinson JH, McLaughlin (1981) Identification of a sex pheromone of Heliothis subflexa (GN.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and field trapping studies using different blends of components. J Chem Ecol 7:1011–1022Google Scholar
  43. Teal PEA, Tumlinson JH, McLaughlin JR, Heath R, Rush RA (1984) (Z)-11-hexadecen-1-ol: A behavioral modifying chemical present in the pheromone gland of female Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Can Entomol 116:777–779Google Scholar
  44. Tumlinson JH (1979) Recent discoveries in insect pheromone chemistry. In: Geissbuhler H (ed) Advances in pesticide science. Part 2. Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  45. Vetter RS, Baker TC (1984) Behavioral responses of male Heliothis zea moths in sustained-flight tunnel to combinations of 4 compounds identified from female sex pheromone gland. J Chem Ecol 10:193–202Google Scholar
  46. Vickers NJ, Christensen TA, Mustaparta H, Baker TC (1991) Chemical communication in heliothine moths. III. Flight behavior of male Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis virescens in response to varying ratios of intra- and interspecific sex pheromone components. J Comp Physiol A 169:275–280Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tor J. Almaas
    • 1
  • Thomas A. Christensen
    • 2
    • 1
  • Hanna Mustaparta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Trondheim, AVHDragvollNorway
  2. 2.Arizona Research Laboratories, Division of NeurobiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations