Skip to main content
Log in

A fungus infecting domestic flies manipulates sexual behaviour of its host

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Enomopathogenic fungus Entomophthora muscae infects and kills domestic flies Musca domestica, and rates of transmission are higher at high population densities. I tested whether features of parasitized hosts increased the likelihood of transmission of the fungus in a series of experiments. Individual flies contacting an infected conspecific had a much higher probability of becoming infected than had flies contacting a dead fly without signs of infection. Males especially were attracted to and behaved sexually towards dead, infected flies even when a choice was available between a dead, infected fly and a dead, uninfected individual. The abdomen of infected flies swelled considerably as a consequence of infection, and uninfected female flies with larger abdomens are more fecund than the average female and maybe more attractive. Experiments in which abdomens of infected and uninfected flies were cut off and glued back on other flies demonstrated that the abdomens of infected flies were highly attractive to males. When the size of the abdomen of infected and uninfected individual flies was held constant, infected dead flies were still more attractive than corpses of uninfected flies. This result suggests that features other than the size of the swollen abdomen enhanced the attractivity of infected flies. Features of infected hosts therefore increased the likelihood of transmission of the parasitic fungus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW (1975) Discrete multivariate analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Brobyn PJ, Wilding N (1983) Invasive and developmental processes of Entomophthora muscae infecting houseflies (Musca domestica). Trans Br Mycol Soc 80:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur J, McNeil JN (1989) Seasonal microhabitat selection by an endoparasitoid through adaptive modification of host behavior. Science 244:226–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Day RW, Quinn GP (1989) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol Monogr 59:433–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans HC (1982) Entomogenous fungi in tropical forest ecosystems: An appraisal. Ecol Entomol 7:47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans HC (1988) Coevolution of entomogenous fungi and their insect hosts. In: Pirozynski KA, Hawksworth DL (eds) Coevolution of fungi with plants and animals. Academic Press, London, pp 149–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1980) Evolutionary biology and the treatment of signs and symptoms of infectious disease. J Theor Biol 86:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1983) Host-parasite relations, vectors, and the evolution of disease severity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 14:465–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1987) Transmission modes and evolution of the parasitism-mutualism continuum. Ann NY Acad Sci 503:295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1988) Cultural vectors, virulence, and the emergence of evolutionary epidemiology. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 5:215–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1991a) Transmission modes and the evolution of virulence. Hum Nat 2:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1991b) Waterborne transmission and the evolution of virulence among gastrointestinal bacteria. Epidemiol Infect 106:83–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes JC, Bethel WM (1972) Modification of intermediate host behavior by parasites. Zool J Linn Soc 51 (Suppl 1):123–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy CR (1975) Ecological animal parasitology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • King DS, Humber RA (1981) Identification of the Entomophthorales. In: Burges HD (ed) Microbial control of pests and plant diseases. Academic Press, London, pp 107–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobanov AM (1977) Potential fecundity and some questions on reproduction in flies of the family Muscidae. In: Kulemin VV (ed) Insects: vectors of infectious diseases. Ivanovskii Gosudastvennyi Meditzinskii Institut, Ivanovo, pp 46–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Madelin MIT (1966) Fugnal parasites of insects. Annu Rev Entomol 11:423–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (1984) Altered behavioral responses in intermediate hosts: An acanthocephalan parasite strategy. Am Nat 123:572–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullens BA (1985) Host age, sex, and pathogen exposure level as factors in the susceptibility of Musca domestica to Entomophthora muscae. Entomol Exp Appl 37:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullens BA, Rodriguez JL (1985) Dynamics of Entomophthora muscae (Zygomycetes: Entomophthoraceae) among naturally infected muscoid fly (Diptera: Muscidae) hosts. Environ Entomol 14:317–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullens BA, Rodriguez JL, Meyer JA (1987) An epizootiological study of Entomophthora muscae in muscoid fly populations on southern California poultry facilities, with emphasis on Musca domestica. Hilgardia 55:141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (1983) The explanation of organic diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson RA, Evans HC, Latge JP (1988) An atlas of entomopathogenic fungi. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill RA, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moller, A.P. A fungus infecting domestic flies manipulates sexual behaviour of its host. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33, 403–407 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170255

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170255

Key words

Navigation