Euphytica

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 385–403

The breeding of crop ideotypes

  • C. M. Donald
Article

Summary

Most plant breeding is based on “defect elimination” or “selection for yield”. A valuable additional approach is available through the breeding of crop ideotypes, plants with model characteristics known to influence photosynthesis, growth and (in cereals) grain production. Some instances of the successful use of model characters of this kind are quoted.

It is postulated that a successful crop ideotype will be a weak competitor, relative to its mass. Thus the like plants in the crop community will compete with each other to a minimum degree. This relationship of plant form to the exploitation of the enviroment may lead to two negative relationships among genotypes, namely:

  1. (a)

    Between the performance of cultivars at low density and at high density respectively, and

     
  2. (b)

    Between the competitive ability of cultivars against other genotypes on the one hand, and their capacity for yield in pure culture on the other.

     

A crop ideotype will make a minimum demand on resources per unit of dry matter produced. Further, in cereals, each unit of dry matter will include such a number of florets as to ensure that the ear has sufficient capacity to accept all photosynthates either from its own green surfaces or from other parts of the plant. These criteria are to be satisfied especially at high fertility, and when the total pressure by the community on environmental resources is intensified by high density of population.

A wheat ideotype is described. It has a short, strong stem; few, small, erect leaves; a large ear (this specifically means many florets per unit of dry matter of the tops); an erect ear; awns; and a single culm.

The design of crop ideotypes is likely to involve concurrent modifications of the environment. The wheat ideotype here described will call for consideration of the density of planting, the fertilizer rate, the plant arrangement and weed control.

Eventually most plant breeding may be based on ideotypes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asana, R. D., 1965. Ideal and reality in crop plants. I. Wheat. J. Ind. agric. Res. Inst. 3: 63–68.Google Scholar
  2. Aspinall, D., 1961. The control of tillering in the barley plants. I. The pattern of tillering and its relation to nutrient supply. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 14: 493–505.Google Scholar
  3. Aspinall, D., 1963. The control of tillering in the barley plant. II. The control of tiller-bud growth during ear development. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 16: 285–304.Google Scholar
  4. Beachell, H. M. and Jennings, P. R., 1965. Need for modification of plant type. In: The mineral nutrition of the rice plant. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, G. D. H. and Kirby, E. J. M., 1966. Utilization of growth responses in breeding new varieties of cereals. In. The growth of cereals and grasses. Butterworths, London, pp. 308–319.Google Scholar
  6. Bunting, A. H. and Drennan, D. S. H., 1966. Some aspects of the morphology and physiology of cereals in the vegetative phase. In: The growth of cereals and grasses. Butterworths, London, pp. 20–38.Google Scholar
  7. Buttrose, M. S., 1962. Physiology of cereal grain. III. Photosynthesis in the wheat ear during grain development. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 15: 611–618.Google Scholar
  8. Buttrose, M. S. and May, L. H., 1959. Physiology of cereal grain. I. The source of carbon for the developing barley kernel. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 12: 40–52.Google Scholar
  9. Donald, C. M., 1962. In search of yield. J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 28: 171–178.Google Scholar
  10. Donald, C. M., 1963. Competition among crop and pasture plants. Adv. Agron. 15: 1–118.Google Scholar
  11. Duncan, W. G., Loomis, R. S., Williams, W. A. and Hanau, R., 1967. A model for simulating photosynthesis in plant communities. Hilgardia 38: 181–205.Google Scholar
  12. Gardener, C. J., 1966. The physiological basis for yield differences in three high and three low yielding varieties of barley. Thesis, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Grundbacher, F. J., 1963. The physiological function of the cereal awn. Botan. Rev. 29: 366–381.Google Scholar
  14. Hageman, R. H., Leng, E. R. and Dudley, J. W., 1967. A biochemical approach to corn breeding. Adv. Agron. 19: 45–86.Google Scholar
  15. Harlan, H. V. and Anthony, S., 1920. Development of barley kernels in normal and clipped spikes, and the limitations of awnless and hooded varieties. J. agric. Res. 19: 431–472.Google Scholar
  16. Hayashi, K. and Ito, H., 1962. Studies on the form of plant in rice varieties with particular reference to the efficiency in utilizing sunlight. I. The significance of extinction coefficient in rice plant communities. (In Japanese, tables in English). Proc. Crop. Sci. Soc. Japan 30: 329–333.Google Scholar
  17. Holliday, R., 1963. The effect of row width ontthe yield of cereals. Field Crop Abstr. 16: 71–81.Google Scholar
  18. Hutchinson, J. R., Silow, R. A. and Stephens, S. G., 1947. The evolution of Gossypium, and the differentiation of the cultivated cottons. Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  19. I.R.R.I., 1966. Intern. Rice Res. Inst. Reptr 2, Nos 4 and 5.Google Scholar
  20. Jennings, P. R., 1964. Plant Type as a rice breeding objective. Crop Sci. 4: 13–15.Google Scholar
  21. Jennings, P. R., 1966. The evolution of plant type in Oryza sativa. Econ. Bot. 20: 396–402.Google Scholar
  22. Jennings, P. R. and Aquino, R. C., 1968. Studies on competition in rice. III. Mechanisms of competition among phenotypes. Evolution (in press).Google Scholar
  23. Jennings, P. R. and Jesus, J. de, 1968. Studies on competition in rice. I. Competition in mixtures of varieties. Evolution 22: 119–124.Google Scholar
  24. Jensen, N. F. and Federer, W. T., 1965. Competing ability in wheat. Crop Sci. 5: 449–452.Google Scholar
  25. Kasanaga, H. and Monsi, M., 1954. On the light-transmission of leaves, and its meaning for the production of matter in plant communities. Japan J. Bot. 14: 304–324.Google Scholar
  26. Kasper, R. E., 1929. The contrast in response of Kafir and Milo to variations in spacing. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 21: 344–354.Google Scholar
  27. Krassovsky, I., 1926. Physiological activity of the seminal and nodal roots of crop plants. Soil Sci. 21: 307–325.Google Scholar
  28. Lang, A. L., Pendleton, J. W., and Dungan, C. H., 1956. Influence of population and nitrogen levels on yield and protein and oil contents of nine corn hybrids. Agron. J. 41: 284–289.Google Scholar
  29. Langer, R. H. M., 1967. Physiological approaches to yield determination in wheat and barley. Field Crop Abstr. 20: 101–106.Google Scholar
  30. Mac Key, J., 1966. The wheat plant as a model in adaptation to high productivity under different environments. Proc. 5th Yugoslav. Symp. on Research in Wheat, Novi Sad, 1966.Google Scholar
  31. Matsushima, S., Tanaka, T. and Hoshino, H., 1964. Analysis of yielddetermining process and its application to yield-prediction and culture improvement of lowland rice. 68. On the relation between morphological characteristics and photosynthetic efficiency. (In Japanese, tables in English). Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Japan. 33: 44–48.Google Scholar
  32. Monsi, M. and Saeki, T., 1953. Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Japan J. Bot. 14: 22–52.Google Scholar
  33. Murata, Y., 1961. Studies on the photosynthesis of rice plants and its culture significance. (In Japanese, tables in English). Bull. Natn. Inst. agric. Sci. (Tokyo) D9: 1–170.Google Scholar
  34. Nichiporovic, A. A., 1954. Photosynthesis and the theory of obtaining high crop yields. 15th Timirjarez Lecture U.S.S.R. Acad. Sci. (Precis by J. N. Black and D. J. Watson in Field Crop Abstr.) 13 (1960): 169–175.Google Scholar
  35. Pendleton, J. W., 1968. Agron. J. (in press).Google Scholar
  36. Pukridge, D. W. and Donald, C. M., 1967. Competition among wheat plants sown at a wide range of densities. Aust. J. agric. Res. 18: 193–211.Google Scholar
  37. Rawson, H. M., 1967. Competition within the wheat plant and the plasticity of response. Thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  38. Sims, H. J., 1963. Changes in the hay production and the harvest index of Australian oat varieties. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 3: 198–201.Google Scholar
  39. Stinson Jr., H. T. and Moss, D. N., 1960. Some effects of shade upon corn hybrids tolerant and intolerant of dense planting. Agron. J. 52: 482–484.Google Scholar
  40. Stringfield, G. H., 1964. Objectives in corn improvement. Adv. Agron. 16: 101–137.Google Scholar
  41. Suneson, C. A., 1949. Survival of four barley varieties in a mixture. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 41: 459–461.Google Scholar
  42. Swaminathan, M. S., Chopra, V. L. and Bhaskaran, S., 1962. Chromosome aberrations and the frequency and spectrum of mutations induced by ethylmethane sulphonate in barley and wheat. Indian J. Genet. Pl. Breed. 22: 192–207.Google Scholar
  43. Tanaka, A., Kawana, K. and Yamaguchi, J., 1966. Photosynthesis, respiration, and plant type of the tropical rice plant. Intern. Rice Res. Inst., Philippines, Tech. Bull. 7.Google Scholar
  44. Tanaka, A., Navasero, S. A., Garcia, C. V., Parao, F. T. and Ramirez, E., 1964. Growth habit of the rice plant in the tropics and its effect on nitrogen response. Intern. Rice Res. Inst., Philippines, Tech. Bull. 3.Google Scholar
  45. Tanner, J. W., Gardener, C. J., Stoskopf, N. C., and Reinbergs, E., 1966. Some observations on upright-leaf-type small grains. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 46: 690.Google Scholar
  46. Thorne, G. N., 1963. Varietal differences in photosynthesis of ears and leaves of barley. Ann. Bot. (N.S.) 27: 155–174.Google Scholar
  47. Thorne, G. N., 1966. Physiological aspects of grain yield in cereals. In: The Growth of Cereals and Grasses, Butterworths, London, pp. 88–105.Google Scholar
  48. Tsunoda, S., 1959a. A developmental analysis of yielding ability in varieties of field crops. I. Leaf area per plant and leaf area ratio. Japan J. Breed. 9: 161–168.Google Scholar
  49. Tsunoda, S., 1959b. A developmental analysis of yielding ability in varieties of field crops. II. The assimilation-system of plants as affected by the form, direction and arrangement of single leaves. Japan J. Breed. 9: 237–244.Google Scholar
  50. Tsunoda, S., 1960. A developmental analysis of yielding ability in varieties of field crops. III. The depth of green colour and the nitrogen content of leaves. Japan J. Breed. 10: 107–111.Google Scholar
  51. Tsunoda, S., 1962. A developmental analysis of yielding ability in varieties of field crops. IV. Quantitative and spatial development of the stem-system. Japan J. Breed. 12: 49–55.Google Scholar
  52. Vogel, O. A., Allan, R. E. and Petersen, C. J., 1963. Plant and performance characteristics of semi-dwarf winter wheats producing most efficiently in eastern Washington. Agron. J. 55: 397–398.Google Scholar
  53. Wardlaw, I. F., 1967. The effect of water stress on translocation in relation to photosynthesis and growth. I. Effect during grain development in wheat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 20: 25–39.Google Scholar
  54. Welbank, P. J., French, S. A. W. and Witts, K. J., 1966. Dependence of yields of wheat varieties on their leaf area durations. Ann. Bot. (N.S.) 30: 291–299.Google Scholar
  55. Wiebe, G. A., Petr, F. C., and Stevens, H., 1963. Interplant competition between barley genotypes. In: Statistical genetics and plant breeding. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Natn. Res. Council Publ. 982. pp. 546–557.Google Scholar
  56. Wilson, J. W., 1960. Influence of spatical arrangement of foliage area on light interception and pasture growth. Proc. 8th Intern. Grassland Congr. Reading, England., pp. 275–279.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© H. Veenman en Zonen N.V. 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Donald
    • 1
  1. 1.Waite Agricultural Research InstituteThe University of Adelaide

Personalised recommendations