Skip to main content
Log in

A Newly Designed Intramedullary Nail for the Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures using open reduction and plate fi xation is generally accepted as the best choice in many studies. However, periosteal stripping, haematoma evacuation may result in delayed union, nonunion and infection. Refracture after plate removal is another concern. To overcome these problems intramedullary nails (IM) with different designs have been used with various outcomes. However previous IM nails have some shortcomings such is rotational instability and interlocking difficulties. We evaluated the results of newly designed IM nail in the treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults.

Materials and Methods

32 patients who had been treated with the interlocking IM nail for forearm fractures between 2011 and 2014 were included in this study. There were 23 males and 9 females with mean age of 36 years (range 18-68 years). 22 patients (68.8%) had both bone fractures. Nine patients (28.1%) had open fractures. The remaining ten patients (31.2%) had radius or ulna fractures. Grace and Eversmann rating system was used to assess functional evaluation. Patient reported outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores.

Results

Union was achieved in all patients. The mean followup was 17 months (range 13 – 28 months). According to the Grace-Eversmann criteria, 27 patients (87.5%) had excellent or good results. The mean DASH score was 14 (range 5-36). Overall complication rate was 12.5%. Superfi cial infection was encountered in two patients. One patient had delayed union, however fracture healed without any additional surgical procedure. One patient who had open grade 3A, comminuted proximal third radius fracture developed radioulnar synostosis.

Conclusion

The new design IM interlocking forearm nail provides satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of adult diaphyseal forearm fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson LD, Sisk D, Tooms RE, Park WI 3rd. Compression-plate fixation in acute diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:287–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman MW, Gordon JE, Zissimos AG. Compression-plate fixation of acute fractures of the diaphyses of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:159–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perren SM, Cordey J, Rahn BA, Gautier E, Schneider E. Early temporary porosis of bone induced by internal fixation implants. A reaction to necrosis, not to stress protection?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;232:139–51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Perren SM, Klaue K, Pohler O, Predieri M, Steinemann S, Gautier E. The limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990;109:304–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frigg R. Locking Compression Plate (LCP). An osteosynthesis plate based on the Dynamic Compression Plate and the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix). Injury 2001;32 Suppl 2:63–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saikia K, Bhuyan S, Bhattacharya T, Borgohain M, Jitesh P, Ahmed F. Internal fixation of fractures of both bones forearm: Comparison of locked compression and limited contact dynamic compression plate. Indian J Orthop 2011;45:417–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Azboy I, Demirtas A, Uçar BY, Bulut M, Alemdar C, Ozkul E. Effectiveness of locking versus dynamic compression plates for diaphyseal forearm fractures. Orthopedics 2013;36:e917–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leung F, Chow SP. Locking compression plate in the treatment of forearm fractures: A prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2006;14:291–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Henle P, Ortlieb K, Kuminack K, Mueller CA, Suedkamp NP. Problems of bridging plate fixation for the treatment of forearm shaft fractures with the locking compression plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:85–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knight RA, Purvis GD. Fractures of both bones of the forearm in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949;31A:755–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sage FP. Medullary fixation of fractures of the forearm. A study of the medullary canal of the radius and a report of fifty fractures of the radius treated with a prebent triangular nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959;41-A: 1489–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Street DM. Intramedullary forearm nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;212 219–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crenshaw AH Jr. Fractures of shoulder girdle, arm, and forearm. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2008. p. 3431–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Visna P, Beitl E, Pilný J, Cizmár I, Vlcek M, Kalvach J, et al. Interlocking nailing of forearm fractures. Acta Chir Belg 2008;108:333–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao H, Luo CF, Zhang CQ, Shi HP, Fan CY, Zen BF. Internal fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm by interlocking intramedullary nail: Short-term results in eighteen patients. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:384–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weckbach A, Blattert TR, Weisser CH. Interlocking nailing of forearm fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:309–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee YH, Lee SK, Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Kim KH. Interlocking contoured intramedullary nail fixation for selected diaphyseal fractures of the forearm in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1891–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saka G, Saglam N, Kurtulmus T, Avci CC, Akpinar F, Kovaci H, et al. New interlocking intramedullary radius and ulna nails for treating forearm diaphyseal fractures in adults: A retrospective study. Injury 2014;45 Suppl 1:S16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification. J Orthop Trauma 1996;10 Suppl 1:v-ix, 1–154.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: Retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:453–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saka G, Saglam N, Kurtulmus T, Bakir U, Avci CC, Akpinar F, et al. Treatment of isolated diaphyseal fractures of the radius with an intramedullary nail in adults. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24:1085–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grace TG, Eversmann WW Jr. Forearm fractures: Treatment by rigid fixation with early motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:433–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Köse A, Aydin A, Ezirmik N, Can CE, Topal M, Tipi T. Alternative treatment of forearm double fractures: New design intramedullary nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014;134:1387–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SK, Kim KJ, Lee JW, Choy WS. Plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing for both forearm bones fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24:769–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozkaya U, Kiliç A, Ozdogan U, Beng K, Kabukçuoglu Y. Comparison between locked intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis in the management of adult forearm fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2009;43:14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stern PJ, Drury WJ. Complications of plate fixation of forearm fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;175:25–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Behnke NM, Redjal HR, Nguyen VT, Zinar DM. Internal fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm: A retrospective comparison of hybrid fixation versus dual plating. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:611–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fanuele J, Blazar P. Extensor pollicis longus tendon rupture in an adult after intramedullary nailing of a radius fracture: Case report. J Hand Surg Am 2009;34:627–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Parikh SN, Jain VV, Denning J, Tamai J, Mehlman CT, McCarthy JJ, et al. Complications of elastic stable intramedullary nailing in pediatric fracture management: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:e184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Azboy.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azboy, I., Demirtaş, A., Alemdar, C. et al. A Newly Designed Intramedullary Nail for the Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Adults. IJOO 51, 697–703 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_79_16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_79_16

Keywords

MeSh terms

Navigation