Abstract
Introduction
Treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures by open reduction and internal plate fixation is a well-accepted strategy. In a variety of fracture localizations, the use of bridging plate fixation with locking compression plates (LCP) has been shown to improve biomechanical and biological characteristics. Only very limited clinical data are available on bridging plate fixation using LCPs for the treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures. The aims of this study were to assess both clinical outcomes of LCP fracture treatments, and the implant-specific advantages and disadvantages.
Method
The study consisted of 53 patients. All relevant data were extracted from the medical reports and radiographs. Of the 53 patients, 39 completed the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire and 35 patients were available for clinical examination. The mean time of follow-up was 23.3 months.
Results
Thirty-nine fractures of the radius and 45 fractures of the ulna were treated with 3.5 mm LCPs. Due to a fracture non-union, four patients underwent a second operation. In 13 patients, hardware had already been removed at the time of follow-up. Complete documentation of the removal operation was available for ten patients; in seven of these, procedures difficulties occurred. Mean ranges of motion were 138°, 141° and 162° for elbow flexion–extension, wrist flexion–extension and pronation–supination, respectively. The mean DASH score was calculated at 14.9.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our data show that clinical and functional outcomes of LCP plating of diaphyseal forearm fractures are comparable to the use of conventional implants. However, implant-specific problems during hardware removal must be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 18:488–493
Gardner MJ, Brophy RH, Campbell D, Mahajan A, Wright TM, Helfet DL et al (2005) The mechanical behavior of locking compression plates compared with dynamic compression plates in a cadaver radius model. J Orthop Trauma 19:597–603
Germann G, Wind G, Harth A (1999) The DASH (Disability of Arm–Shoulder–Hand) Questionnaire—a new instrument for evaluating upper extremity treatment outcome. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 31:149–152
Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:453–458
Haug RH, Street CC, Goltz M (2002) Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and non-locking plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1319–1326
Hertel R, Pisan M, Lambert S, Ballmer FT (1996) Plate osteosynthesis of diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna. Injury 27:545–548
Jester A, Harth A, Germann G (2005) Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH Questionnaire. J Hand Surg (Am) 30:1074
Larson AN, Rizzo M (2007) Locking plate technology and its applications in upper extremity fracture care. Hand Clin 23:269–78, vii
Leung F, Chow SP (2003) A prospective, randomized trial comparing the limited contact dynamic compression plate with the point contact fixator for forearm fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:2343–2348
Leung F, Chow SP (2006) Locking compression plate in the treatment of forearm fractures: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14:291–294
Mueller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
Stoffel K, Booth G, Rohrl SM, Kuster M (2007) A comparison of conventional versus locking plates in intraarticular calcaneus fractures: a biomechanical study in human cadavers. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22:100–105
Tscherne H, Oestern HJ (1982) A new classification of soft-tissue damage in open and closed fractures (author’s transl). Unfallheilkunde 85:111–115
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this paper. No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henle, P., Ortlieb, K., Kuminack, K. et al. Problems of bridging plate fixation for the treatment of forearm shaft fractures with the locking compression plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131, 85–91 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1119-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1119-y